how realistic is The Resident?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

dr.dareyou

Full Member
5+ Year Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2017
Messages
45
Reaction score
137
So I grew up knowing art to be the mirror of society. Most things we portray in drama or art have some sort of stem in real life events. How common is it for attendings to blame their mistakes on poor residents, scapegoat them in front of patients, mock their abilities, humiliate them in front of colleagues, and for a person who's made multiple medical mistakes to somehow rise to a star-like state in the field of medicine? Oh, and would an actual attending threaten to deport you if you didn't let him do a surgery you'd been training for for months, only so that you could give a crash course of your hard work in a couple of hours?

Members don't see this ad.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
I really did not want to come off as naive, and thank you so much for all of your responses. I'm prepared for some level of arrogance with my superiors because this is a really hard field. I get it, pride is part of the deal. But like, some of the stuff just seems to be very much possible.

The show also talks about the politics in medicine. I know that the real decision makers are MBA's not MD's, for the most part. So for instance, in the second episode, a long standing patient's heart arrives and one of the senior attendings suggests reassigning it to a powerful politician also in the hospital at the same time. He might also be a donor. Or when someone dies because of a nicked artery, they scour the patient's history and blame it on an undisclosed heart condition. I know Grey's is unrealistic, but are my worries about the politics of medicine totally unfounded?
 
Members don't see this ad :)
So I grew up knowing art to be the mirror of society. Most things we portray in drama or art have some sort of stem in real life events. How common is it for attendings to blame their mistakes on poor residents, scapegoat them in front of patients, mock their abilities, humiliate them in front of colleagues, and for a person who's made multiple medical mistakes to somehow rise to a star-like state in the field of medicine? Oh, and would an actual attending threaten to deport you if you didn't let him do a surgery you'd been training for for months, only so that you could give a crash course of your hard work in a couple of hours?

The Resident is a realistic portrayal of medicine in the same way that The Godfather is a realistic portrayal of 19th century Rhode Island clam diggers.
 
The trailer itself is pretty cringe inducing. I’m not sure how that’s not a massive giveaway that it’s going to be passable at best.
 
I don’t know guys. The show is kinda true. I mean, my colleagues and myself included are incredibly good looking. We’re all kind of bro in our program. Obviously very talented. Oh and humble. The most of all the specialties. Cheers.
 
thank you to everyone who replied. No one really denied the politics in medicine though...the influence of money and donors, the obvious issues with hierarchy? Its obvious how much it affects patients, but how much does it affect training?

Sorry i like hard questions...😛
 
thank you to everyone who replied. No one really denied the politics in medicine though...the influence of money and donors, the obvious issues with hierarchy? Its obvious how much it affects patients, but how much does it affect training?

Sorry i like hard questions...😛
No one responded to it because it is laughably ignorant of you to even ask. Complete and utter horse**** is all that show spreads.
 
The show also talks about the politics in medicine. I know that the real decision makers are MBA's not MD's, for the most part. So for instance, in the second episode, a long standing patient's heart arrives and one of the senior attendings suggests reassigning it to a powerful politician also in the hospital at the same time. He might also be a donor. Or when someone dies because of a nicked artery, they scour the patient's history and blame it on an undisclosed heart condition. I know Grey's is unrealistic, but are my worries about the politics of medicine totally unfounded?
Neither of those scenarios has any basis in reality.
 
None of the shows are that realistic because no one would want to watch what a resident really does, especially in internal medicine. Writing H and P s as fast as you can and making sure you change all the "today's" to "yesterday's" on the SOAP NOTES, prewriting the D/C summaries, begging the social worker to make more than one call to place at a nursing home or rehab, sometimes calling these places yourself.

Never did I do anything behind the back of the attending let alone the chief of surgery or CEO. The highest stakes I was dealing with were the Hb is 7.1 and supposed to transfuse below 7. Hmmm, let's just do it!

That isn't very TV worthy.
 
I started it last week and just caught up... season 1 cliffhanger was really good... anyway -- parts of it are realistic and others are not. You don't have residents who are allowed to just break protocol left and right like Conrad does, you don't have billing people going around telling you to overbill, and surgical errors are not as common as they are in the show. Some scenes in the ER have some truth to them, I think the dynamic between Nic and Conrad has some validity in the sense that there are some inappropriate relationships that form between residents and nurses... also you don't have residents that behave like Okafor, they would most likely get thrown out of the program if they behaved like that with patients
 
Top