How to be knowledgable about vetmed and the field

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

FeenyFee

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2015
Messages
203
Reaction score
59
Hi ya'll. So I was looking at some interview questions from UF and was kind of embarrassed that I didn't know about a lot of important topics in the field. I know interviewers look for people that are knowable and actually have opinions that they can back up.

Some topics that I saw were I saw were OneHealth initiative, invasive species, SeaWorld, euth's, animal research, etc.

Some of these things I have opinions on but it may not be a "developed" one if that makes sense.

I've been working as a vet tech and volunteering at a sanctuary for a few months but I still feel like I'm not exposed to enough. Other than SDN and shadowing, what resources do you find helpful?

Any suggestions for books, websites, podcasts, social media accounts, blogs?
 
Just make sure you're reading resources that don't have an obvious bias (I'm looking at SeaWorld here). That can be hard, because both sides will have a bias. I'm actually not aware of any reliable resource that is completely neutral on this topic. I was actually asked about SeaWorld/Blackfish at UF, but I also feel very adequately informed on both sides. If you don't feel informed about something, try not to feel like you need to blurt out an opinion. I think the adcoms expect you to have some working knowledge about most hot topics in the field. Explain what you know and how you feel about it, but also explain that you feel you need to learn more about it to form a more educated opinion (if that's the case). Part of the problem with controversy is that too few people seek out knowledge before forming an opinion. As veterinarians, you may be approached with questions about controversies, and you'll need to know how to handle that.

Your state's DNR could be good for invasive species if you're not even sure which species in particular are an issue. That's also a good place to read about nuisance species (species that people seek to kill year round, even if they are native). Read up on conservation efforts for species that are in trouble. I've been asked "But why is it okay to kill off invasive species? We're supposed to reduce suffering and promote health. Why don't invasive species apply here?" The knee-jerk reaction is to say "Because they're killing off other species via competition" or something, but I personally think it's much harder to answer (again, my opinion).

OneHealth has a website.

This is just my opinion, but SDN (or any forum) isn't a source you should use to form your opinions. Most of what you'll see on here are opinions about something. There's a good amount of pressure here to agree, or you'll have to argue with a handful of people to defend your POV (especially when something is a pretty hot topic and a lot of people get involved). There are many cases where some people just have a lack of facts/experience and have formed opinions that don't make any sense, but that's a little different. You can definitely learn a lot from posters on here, but you are entitled to forming your own independent opinion regardless of what someone says to you or about something on a thread you're reading. Plus, if you just repeat something that a poster on here has said, you'll probably dig your own grave if someone presses you even more and you're out of words (I've heard someone drop near-identical quotes of SDN stuff, and they were most certainly not the OP). I'm not saying you'd do that, I just think it's easy to want to take these opinions and run with it.
 
Last edited:
Just make sure you're reading resources that don't have an obvious bias (I'm looking at SeaWorld here). That can be hard, because both sides will have a bias. I'm actually not aware of any reliable resource that is completely neutral on this topic. I was actually asked about SeaWorld/Blackfish at UF, but I also feel very adequately informed on both sides. If you don't feel informed about something, try not to feel like you need to blurt out an opinion. I think the adcoms expect you to have some working knowledge about most hot topics in the field. Explain what you know and how you feel about it, but also explain that you feel you need to learn more about it to form a more educated opinion (if that's the case). Part of the problem with controversy is that too few people seek out knowledge before forming an opinion. As veterinarians, you may be approached with questions about controversies, and you'll need to know how to handle that.

Your state's DNR could be good for invasive species if you're not even sure which species in particular are an issue. That's also a good place to read about nuisance species (species that people seek to kill year round, even if they are native). Read up on conservation efforts for species that are in trouble. I've been asked "But why is it okay to kill of invasive species? We're supposed to reduce suffering and promote health. Why don't invasive species not apply here?" The knee-jerk reaction is to say "Because they're killing off other species via competition" or something, but I personally think it's much harder to answer (again, my opinion).

OneHealth has a website.

This is just my opinion, but SDN (or any forum) isn't a source you should use to form your opinions. Most of what you'll see on here are opinions about something. There's a good amount of pressure here to agree, or you'll have to argue with a handful of people to defend your POV (especially when something is a pretty hot topic and a lot of people get involved). There are many cases where some people just have a lack of facts/experience and have formed opinions that don't make any sense, but that's a little different. You can definitely learn a lot from posters on here, but you are entitled to forming your own independent opinion regardless of what someone says to you or about something on a thread you're reading. Plus, if you just repeat something that a poster on here has said, you'll probably dig your own grave if someone presses you even more and you're out of words (I've heard someone drop near-identical quotes of SDN stuff, and they were most certainly not the OP). I'm not saying you'd do that, I just think it's easy to want to take these opinions and run with it.
there is a thread here that can be resurrected on articles and recent happenings in the vet world. I think because you are involved in more threads regarding opinions, you may see it that way. You're absolutely right that you should form your own opinion. But being able to discuss them is also important, even with people that don't agree with you. If you feel one way about something, learning how to defend that opinion is also important for interviews.

http://forums.studentdoctor.net/thr...medicine-current-events.874861/#post-11996429

You can start one for this year if you feel inclined.
 
there is a thread here that can be resurrected on articles and recent happenings in the vet world. I think because you are involved in more threads regarding opinions, you may see it that way. You're absolutely right that you should form your own opinion. But being able to discuss them is also important, even with people that don't agree with you. If you feel one way about something, learning how to defend that opinion is also important for interviews.

http://forums.studentdoctor.net/thr...medicine-current-events.874861/#post-11996429

You can start one for this year if you feel inclined.
So it sounded like the OP was viewing SDN as a resource for forming opinions. I suggested the OP not use the forum that way, as there are more unbiased resources out there. If anything, we post some good links in these discussions that the OP could check out. It doesn't say anywhere in my post that opinions aren't worth discussing, but like I did say, regardless of what anyone on here has to say, you are entitled to the opinion you have (even if it is pretty clearly based on a lack of facts/experience).
 
This is just my opinion, but SDN (or any forum) isn't a source you should use to form your opinions. Most of what you'll see on here are opinions about something. There's a good amount of pressure here to agree, or you'll have to argue with a handful of people to defend your POV (especially when something is a pretty hot topic and a lot of people get involved).
This is the part where you imply that SDN is not useful for this. It implies heavily that SDN is not good for this AT ALL. I disagree. and therefore responded with reasoning
 
VIN (The Veterinary Information Network) has a public news service on line (http://news.vin.com/) - VIN is a for profit company, but it's fairly unbiased as it's owned and run by vets without any corporate sponsorship or subsidies. VIN also has a blog (http://www.vin.com/VetzInsight/), but I know less about what's on the blog than what's on their news service.
 
Some of the courses in my major demand keeping tabs on animal welfare related topics, but I also do a lot of reading. DVM360.com is an example of a good site that compiles news on a lot of current issues in vet med. I would suggest using it as a launching point of sorts-- browse it to get a feel for some major current topics, and then do some additional Google-ing to learn more about them.
 
Definitely read literature and publications, watch out for too much bias, but also know how to point the weaknesses and strengths in other's arguments. That's important to know how to do to healthily discuss a controversial or debatable topic. The more of both sides that you know, while still being able to back up yours, the better. OP, I definitely think you should start an above thread for this year, oh no wait I want to do it! I love to discuss stuff like this and I wouldn't mind doing it on here.
 
This is the part where you imply that SDN is not useful for this. It implies heavily that SDN is not good for this AT ALL. I disagree. and therefore responded with reasoning
The OP isn't asking for good places to discuss, she is asking about good places to form opinions. I wouldn't ever say that SDN isn't useful for discussing opinions (because it is), so that's why I didn't say it. It certainly is not a good place to form your opinion on a topic you were previously unaware of because of the reasons I stated.
 
The OP isn't asking for good places to discuss, she is asking about good places to form opinions. I wouldn't ever say that SDN isn't useful for discussing opinions (because it is), so that's why I didn't say it. It certainly is not a good place to form your opinion on a topic you were previously unaware of because of the reasons I stated.
SDN users also commonly post things here to discuss (with the links). So again, I disagree. You're entitled to disagree. But I wanted to make sure I gave the user some information.
 
I subscribed to AVMA's Animal Health SmartBrief a while back, and it's a pretty decent digest of animal health news. It's a good starting place. When I read something interesting, I usually have to go somewhere else to learn more about it. But a daily brief like that is great for putting things on your radar.

edit: cross-posted. Dang. 😉
 
I subscribed to AVMA's Animal Health SmartBrief a while back, and it's a pretty decent digest of animal health news. It's a good starting place. When I read something interesting, I usually have to go somewhere else to learn more about it. But a daily brief like that is great for putting things on your radar.

edit: cross-posted. Dang. 😉
I also really like that. Gives me a snapshot. But allows me to go in depth if desired
 
Hi ya'll. So I was looking at some interview questions from UF and was kind of embarrassed that I didn't know about a lot of important topics in the field. I know interviewers look for people that are knowable and actually have opinions that they can back up.

Some topics that I saw were I saw were OneHealth initiative, invasive species, SeaWorld, euth's, animal research, etc.

Some of these things I have opinions on but it may not be a "developed" one if that makes sense.

I've been working as a vet tech and volunteering at a sanctuary for a few months but I still feel like I'm not exposed to enough. Other than SDN and shadowing, what resources do you find helpful?

Any suggestions for books, websites, podcasts, social media accounts, blogs?

I also suggest that you are educated in things that make your application stand out. One is example is that my family owns pet stores that sell animals. In my K-State interview, I was asked something along the lines of, "what is the difference between animal welfare and animal rights from the pet store perspective". If you've spent a ton of time in shelters, know stuff about over-population. If you've done zoo, know those controversies. There are the big ones out there, obviously. But if you have something uncommon on your app, know some of the controversies attached to that.
 
I subscribed to AVMA's Animal Health SmartBrief a while back, and it's a pretty decent digest of animal health news. It's a good starting place. When I read something interesting, I usually have to go somewhere else to learn more about it. But a daily brief like that is great for putting things on your radar.

edit: cross-posted. Dang. 😉

I also really like that. Gives me a snapshot. But allows me to go in depth if desired

Where/how do you subscribe?
 
there is a thread here that can be resurrected on articles and recent happenings in the vet world. I think because you are involved in more threads regarding opinions, you may see it that way. You're absolutely right that you should form your own opinion. But being able to discuss them is also important, even with people that don't agree with you. If you feel one way about something, learning how to defend that opinion is also important for interviews.

http://forums.studentdoctor.net/thr...medicine-current-events.874861/#post-11996429

You can start one for this year if you feel inclined.

Thanks dyachei!!
 
VIN (The Veterinary Information Network) has a public news service on line (http://news.vin.com/) - VIN is a for profit company, but it's fairly unbiased as it's owned and run by vets without any corporate sponsorship or subsidies. VIN also has a blog (http://www.vin.com/VetzInsight/), but I know less about what's on the blog than what's on their news service.

Thanks I will check that out!
 
I subscribed to AVMA's Animal Health SmartBrief a while back, and it's a pretty decent digest of animal health news. It's a good starting place. When I read something interesting, I usually have to go somewhere else to learn more about it. But a daily brief like that is great for putting things on your radar.

edit: cross-posted. Dang. 😉
Awesome I will look there!
 
Definitely read literature and publications, watch out for too much bias, but also know how to point the weaknesses and strengths in other's arguments. That's important to know how to do to healthily discuss a controversial or debatable topic. The more of both sides that you know, while still being able to back up yours, the better. OP, I definitely think you should start an above thread for this year, oh no wait I want to do it! I love to discuss stuff like this and I wouldn't mind doing it on here.
Feel free rockatiel! 🙂
 
Just make sure you're reading resources that don't have an obvious bias (I'm looking at SeaWorld here). That can be hard, because both sides will have a bias. I'm actually not aware of any reliable resource that is completely neutral on this topic. I was actually asked about SeaWorld/Blackfish at UF, but I also feel very adequately informed on both sides. If you don't feel informed about something, try not to feel like you need to blurt out an opinion. I think the adcoms expect you to have some working knowledge about most hot topics in the field. Explain what you know and how you feel about it, but also explain that you feel you need to learn more about it to form a more educated opinion (if that's the case). Part of the problem with controversy is that too few people seek out knowledge before forming an opinion. As veterinarians, you may be approached with questions about controversies, and you'll need to know how to handle that.

Your state's DNR could be good for invasive species if you're not even sure which species in particular are an issue. That's also a good place to read about nuisance species (species that people seek to kill year round, even if they are native). Read up on conservation efforts for species that are in trouble. I've been asked "But why is it okay to kill off invasive species? We're supposed to reduce suffering and promote health. Why don't invasive species apply here?" The knee-jerk reaction is to say "Because they're killing off other species via competition" or something, but I personally think it's much harder to answer (again, my opinion).

OneHealth has a website.

This is just my opinion, but SDN (or any forum) isn't a source you should use to form your opinions. Most of what you'll see on here are opinions about something. There's a good amount of pressure here to agree, or you'll have to argue with a handful of people to defend your POV (especially when something is a pretty hot topic and a lot of people get involved). There are many cases where some people just have a lack of facts/experience and have formed opinions that don't make any sense, but that's a little different. You can definitely learn a lot from posters on here, but you are entitled to forming your own independent opinion regardless of what someone says to you or about something on a thread you're reading. Plus, if you just repeat something that a poster on here has said, you'll probably dig your own grave if someone presses you even more and you're out of words (I've heard someone drop near-identical quotes of SDN stuff, and they were most certainly not the OP). I'm not saying you'd do that, I just think it's easy to want to take these opinions and run with it.

Thanks pinkpuppy9!🙂
 
Similar to others, I use DVM360 for mostly clinical practice related news and information and AVMA Smart Brief for weekly topical type stories (I usually keep a close eye on ongoing zoonotic outbreaks). I also "liked" many different groups on Facebook so I can get a little daily exposure to some relevant vet med news (Entomological Society of America, AZA, AVMA, USDA, state ag and public health agencies, state vet association, state vet school, etc.).
 
One additional resource my wife used to prepare for interviews was the book Animal Rights: A Very Short Introduction by David DeGrazia.

The book offers a high-level walkthrough regarding several issues of animal rights/animal welfare. It is by no means a full discussion of the literature, but my wife found it helpful to frame some of the issues.

She had an early interview at UF, and came out feeling that animal rights/welfare was the area in which she had performed the worst (including the questions mentioned above by FeenyFee). Although parts of the book got a little abstract and heavy for her taste (she is a STEM woman by training), she felt much more comfortable about her future interviews after reading it and thinking about some of the questions it raised.

Just our $.02 worth.
 
Top