How to get better at physics?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Godric

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
299
Reaction score
0
I am running into a brick wall with physics. I've been using TBR for Bio, Chem, Orgo, and I've noticed amazing improvements in chem and orgo, and some in bio (not as much as chem/orgo), however physics keeps destroying me. I starting book 2 TBR physics and I feel like my physics 1 weak, and unprepared.

What should I do to improve my physics understanding?
Reread? Redo problems (should I keep a log of every problem I get wrong)? Watch some video lecture?

Any advice would be really appreciated!
 
Make sure you actually understand what you are reading before attempting any problems. I know, it sounds obvious but a lot of people actually oversee this.
 
Make sure you actually understand what you are reading before attempting any problems. I know, it sounds obvious but a lot of people actually oversee this.

YES! ie don't waste passages problems unless you know material.

One thing that brought by score up 2 points was memorizing all formulas (especially the main ones, a lot of the secondary/tertiary equations don't need to be memorized 100% but know when to use them and how to manipulate them) and knowing when and how to use them and how to manipulate them. Also units.

Want to practice how to use and manipulate= use TPRH science workbook discretes or EK 1001.

It took me a month to do it and brought my score up a solid 2 points = 12.

PS is the EASIEST section to bring up - that's why I focused on it.

Also TBR is fantastic but for practicing the manipulation, use etc. of formulas in weak areas you need a lot of practice problems - the books listed above provide that. Note: TBR has great (the best) practice for above but not obsessive amounts of questions that ask the concepts/equations over and over and over again.
 
Last edited:
SO if someone is scoring sub 10 on PS and want to bring up overall score and have a limited amount of time left= focus on PS CONTENT

This has been said also many times in the 30+ thread.
 
I couldn't get above a 7 or 8 on the Physics section... I was very frustrated because I knew all the formulas, understood all of the concepts, etc. and had been studying mostly Physics/gen chem for 2 months straight. I never finished on time and always guessed randomly on at least one passage.

Then one day, I took a suggestion and tried NOT READING THE PASSAGES in the physical sciences section.

My score went up to an 11. I thought maybe it was a fluke. I took another. My score was a 12. I took another: 11.

Idk if you are in the same situation where you know all formulas and still can't do well in the physical sciences section, but try this is you think you are in the same situation as I was.

To this day, I have no idea why I was having such problems with my score. Maybe the passages confuse me? Maybe I am relatively slow at doing math? Whatever the reason, I will be NOT reading the passages on the real MCAT and hopefully it will work there too.

We shall see.

Best,
C
 
YES! ie don't waste passages problems unless you know material.

One thing that brought by score up 2 points was memorizing all formulas (especially the main ones, a lot of the secondary/tertiary equations don't need to be memorized 100% but know when to use them and how to manipulate them) and knowing when and how to use them and how to manipulate them. Also units.

Want to practice how to use and manipulate= use TPRH science workbook discretes or EK 1001.

It took me a month to do it and brought my score up a solid 2 points = 12.

PS is the EASIEST section to bring up - that's why I focused on it.

Also TBR is fantastic but for practicing the manipulation, use etc. of formulas in weak areas you need a lot of practice problems - the books listed above provide that. Note: TBR has great (the best) practice for above but not obsessive amounts of questions that ask the concepts/equations over and over and over again.
thats a real big increase! I am going to go back and reread, and when I do jot down the equations and memorize them. Did you review the material differently? (And I dont see any books listed above).
Thanks guys, I have about half (a little less) the passages from chapters 2-5 remaining, so when before I start those I'll have to make sure I know material real well.
 
Then one day, I took a suggestion and tried NOT READING THE PASSAGES in the physical sciences section.

this^^

1. read q
2. read choices, use POE/extremes/units to eliminate or get answer
if not have answer:
3. do math quick (if needed) or if question makes you say "wtf" or feel like you need more info - skim passage.
 
Before content review my PS was between a 3-5. After content review it was at about a 6. I did not do any problems just read the TPR review book, look at the examples, and tried to remember the formulas. After a couple weeks of doing practice tests and problems (for about half the material) my score went up an 8 on TPR tests. For physics, I think it's 90% problems/10% content review if you want to do welll. For gen chem, it's about 50/50 memorization/problems. For physics, I think it's definitely a safe strategy to just start doing problems.
 
YES! ie don't waste passages problems unless you know material.

One thing that brought by score up 2 points was memorizing all formulas (especially the main ones, a lot of the secondary/tertiary equations don't need to be memorized 100% but know when to use them and how to manipulate them) and knowing when and how to use them and how to manipulate them. Also units.

Want to practice how to use and manipulate= use TPRH science workbook discretes or EK 1001.

It took me a month to do it and brought my score up a solid 2 points = 12.

PS is the EASIEST section to bring up - that's why I focused on it.

Also TBR is fantastic but for practicing the manipulation, use etc. of formulas in weak areas you need a lot of practice problems - the books listed above provide that. Note: TBR has great (the best) practice for above but not obsessive amounts of questions that ask the concepts/equations over and over and over again.

Books in bold. the EK 1001 is very cheap (but tprh science workbook better overall). need more info on books, feel free to message me.
 
Before content review my PS was between a 3-5. After content review it was at about a 6. I did not do any problems just read the TPR review book, look at the examples, and tried to remember the formulas. After a couple weeks of doing practice tests and problems (for about half the material) my score went up an 8 on TPR tests. For physics, I think it's 90% problems/10% knowing to content to do well. For gen chem, it's about 50/50 memorization/problems. For physics, I think it's definitely a safe strategy to just start doing problems.

Agree, and when you hit ANY problems you don't know equations/concept for STOP!!! look it up, memorize, and learn how to use them/it. Review them consistently 4-7x a week - make a formula sheet with notes on how to use them (what I did is on 1/2 sheet of paper: "force on ONE charge in E FIELD b/w 2 PLATES?" and 3 inches to the right I would have the equation "xyz=1/2fds" w/ the units and maybe notes about the equation). For very weak areas like in EK1001 (like you missed all the q's for a concept) redo them a week later to make sure you have them now.
 
thats a real big increase! I am going to go back and reread, and when I do jot down the equations and memorize them. Did you review the material differently? (And I dont see any books listed above).
Thanks guys, I have about half (a little less) the passages from chapters 2-5 remaining, so when before I start those I'll have to make sure I know material real well.

well I reviewed material 100% 2x slowly rereading every word. Then third time it was only 75% of material (my weaknesses - I knew them since I kept track of scores in TBR). But I went through 2x in beginning cause I was non-trad.
 
well I reviewed material 100% 2x slowly rereading every word. Then third time it was only 75% of material (my weaknesses - I knew them since I kept track of scores in TBR). But I went through 2x in beginning cause I was non-trad.

I have problems with PS too (averaging 5-8/15 on EK 30-min tests). I'm two-third way into my first content review and expect to finish in 5 days. My exam date is on the 21st of June. Do you recommend that I redo content review, or should I do EK1001 plus TBR passages?
 
I have problems with PS too (averaging 5-8/15 on EK 30-min tests). I'm two-third way into my first content review and expect to finish in 5 days. My exam date is on the 21st of June. Do you recommend that I redo content review, or should I do EK1001 plus TBR passages?

Are you only using EK for PS content review? I feel like I'd be lost if I was using it to study content, especially physics. I have the EK review books and I was lost on a lot of their physics explanations/content review stuff. TPR was much better for me, since my physics is my weak point and really needed everything explained. They have plenty of example questions as you read and they work you through them in the chapters, unlike EK that just goes over the basics.

If I were you I wouldn't redo content. I think you need to start doing physics problems now, so you can absorb the material better. As for gen chem, I feel like it's an even mix of doing content review and problems/passages. If you have a basic understanding of the gen chem concepts, I'd probably just go ahead and start problems/passages. June 21st is coming up fast and you need as much practice with problems and practice tests as you can get. Doing problems/passages will be the fastest way to improve your score in a short amount of time. I'd say a min of 2 weeks doing practice tests alone.
 
Are you only using EK for PS content review? I feel like I'd be lost if I was using it to study content, especially physics. I have the EK review books and I was lost on a lot of their physics explanations/content review stuff. TPR was much better for me, since my physics is my weak point and really needed everything explained. They have plenty of example questions as you read and they work you through them in the chapters, unlike EK that just goes over the basics.

If I were you I wouldn't redo content. I think you need to start doing physics problems now, so you can absorb the material better. As for gen chem, I feel like it's an even mix of doing content review and problems/passages. If you have a basic understanding of the gen chem concepts, I'd probably just go ahead and start problems/passages. June 21st is coming up fast and you need as much practice with problems and practice tests as you can get. Doing problems/passages will be the fastest way to improve your score in a short amount of time. I'd say a min of 2 weeks doing practice tests alone.

Thanks for responding.

Yes, I only use EK for content review. Starting June 1, I'll be doing one day of FL followed by 2 days of EK1001, EK101 verbal, and TBR passages. Rinse and repeat. This will enable me to take 7 FL's plus 13 days of practice.

I know it would be ideal to push my exam back by one month, but I honestly don't need 30+ score, since I'm applying to only DO schools. However, if I don't score on AAMC FL 25+ by June 7, I am postponing for sure.
 
this^^

1. read q
2. read choices, use POE/extremes/units to eliminate or get answer
if not have answer:
3. do math quick (if needed) or if question makes you say "wtf" or feel like you need more info - skim passage.

I disagree. At least for TBR passages, you need the at least skim the passage before you can do the questions.
 
I disagree. At least for TBR passages, you need the at least skim the passage before you can do the questions.

I disagree as well. Some questions reference the passage. You may pick an answer that is true for most cases, but the passage could be about a rare scenario, and the correct answer might include something strange but stated in the passage.
 
I disagree as well. Some questions reference the passage. You may pick an answer that is true for most cases, but the passage could be about a rare scenario, and the correct answer might include something strange but stated in the passage.

I don't disagree with you. Some questions require the passage to answer the question.

However, it is definitely possible to do relatively better by not reading the passages. I know this because it is true with me.

The trick is in the sacrifices you make for more questions. It is true that I usually miss the 2-3 questions per practice test that REQUIRE some information from the passage that I didn't see because I didnt read the passage. However, the number of questions that I get correct because I have more time to solve the problems greatly outweighs the number that I may miss.

It is true that this is not the strategy for people who are aiming for a 13 or higher, but for people who are struggling with time and need a quick fix when they feel they have finished content review, this strategy works.

I make the sacrifices of those 2-3 questions that are answered directly by the passage and are too hard to find without reading thoroughly and take the huge gain of time so that I can get an average of 12-14 MORE questions correct. The net increase in my raw score is between 9-11 questions out of 52 (just enough to increase my Physical Sciences score by 3-4 points).

I am not saying that there are absolutely no questions in the PS section that require information from the passage... that would be silly.

I don't know. I hope this strategy works from some others too because I was truly struggling with a 7 in the PS section. 10-11 is much more representative of my Physics skills.

Best,
C
 
I don't disagree with you. Some questions require the passage to answer the question.

However, it is definitely possible to do relatively better by not reading the passages. I know this because it is true with me.

The trick is in the sacrifices you make for more questions. It is true that I usually miss the 2-3 questions per practice test that REQUIRE some information from the passage that I didn't see because I didnt read the passage. However, the number of questions that I get correct because I have more time to solve the problems greatly outweighs the number that I may miss.

It is true that this is not the strategy for people who are aiming for a 13 or higher, but for people who are struggling with time and need a quick fix when they feel they have finished content review, this strategy works.

I make the sacrifices of those 2-3 questions that are answered directly by the passage and are too hard to find without reading thoroughly and take the huge gain of time so that I can get an average of 12-14 MORE questions correct. The net increase in my raw score is between 9-11 questions out of 52 (just enough to increase my Physical Sciences score by 3-4 points).

I am not saying that there are absolutely no questions in the PS section that require information from the passage... that would be silly.

I don't know. I hope this strategy works from some others too because I was truly struggling with a 7 in the PS section. 10-11 is much more representative of my Physics skills.

Best,
C
The correct answer is to work on your timing, not skipping the passage. The questions on the MCAT are not intended to take you very long at all to solve, with a few exceptions for the occasional monster problem. You need to figure out why you're taking too long and address that issue.

Are you getting hung up on hard problems? Learn when to give up on a question and move on.

Are you spending too much time reading the passage instead of answering questions? Realize that you only need to do a cursory read-through of the passage to see what it's about and not try to figure out everything your first time through. I don't even bother looking at graphs, charts, tables, or figures unless a question refers back to them.

Are you taking too long on most questions? Learn how to utilize calculation shortcuts (rounding, only bothering with calculating the powers of ten, etc), POE, intuiting physics questions and looking at units (often you don't even need the formulas), and things of that nature. Also consider that you may have content weaknesses that prevent you from being able to quickly solve questions. Just because you can get a question right doesn't mean you're good with the concepts it tested.

I say all of this because while skipping passages might work well enough for you on practice problems on tests, if the recent takers of the MCAT are to be believed then the MCAT has started taking the passage aspect of the test a lot more seriously in recent years. It seems that no longer are many passage questions just glorified discretes, you actually need to read and understand the passages now. Sure, maybe everyone just says that because they freaked out on test day, but it's worth asking yourself what's going to happen to your score if that turns out to be true.
 
The correct answer is to work on your timing, not skipping the passage. The questions on the MCAT are not intended to take you very long at all to solve, with a few exceptions for the occasional monster problem. You need to figure out why you're taking too long and address that issue.

Are you getting hung up on hard problems? .... Are you spending too much time reading the passage instead of answering questions? ...

I disagree. Considering that I have only 2 days before I take the MCAT, sitting down and analyzing WHY I AM GETTING 11s and 12s on the PS section is the least of my worries... and I doubt that anyone in their right mind would tell me to do so.

Why does it matter? My goal is to get a good score and if this method works for me, I will continue with it. If I get to the real MCAT on test day and find that I cant answer any of the questions without reading the passage, its not like I will do much worse, I will just start reading the passages...

Also, considering that everyone who has taken the test has said that timing was a huge problem for them (even if they were finishing in time on practice tests), keeping my strategy may even be better than "working on my timing."

Maybe I will be proven wrong in two days. My guess is that I will do just fine continuing what I am doing.

We shall see!

Best,
C
 
I disagree. Considering that I have only 2 days before I take the MCAT, sitting down and analyzing WHY I AM GETTING 11s and 12s on the PS section is the least of my worries... and I doubt that anyone in their right mind would tell me to do so.

Why does it matter? My goal is to get a good score and if this method works for me, I will continue with it. If I get to the real MCAT on test day and find that I cant answer any of the questions without reading the passage, its not like I will do much worse, I will just start reading the passages...

Also, considering that everyone who has taken the test has said that timing was a huge problem for them (even if they were finishing in time on practice tests), keeping my strategy may even be better than "working on my timing."

Maybe I will be proven wrong in two days. My guess is that I will do just fine continuing what I am doing.

We shall see!

Best,
C
Well obviously if you have only two days it's too late late to do anything. I was assuming you still had at least a month left.
 
this^^

1. read q
2. read choices, use POE/extremes/units to eliminate or get answer
if not have answer:
3. do math quick (if needed) or if question makes you say "wtf" or feel like you need more info - skim passage.

So you basically not knowing anything except numbers go through and choose an answer that doesn't seem extreme? Can you elaborate a bit?
 
Top