"How to Get Really Rich!"...NYT opinion article.

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Splenda88

Full Member
5+ Year Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2019
Messages
5,931
Reaction score
6,387


"Once you’re a doctor, you are protected by state laws from competition from lower cost workers. Rothwell cites research suggesting that nurse practitioners and dental hygienists can perform many duties now done by doctors and dentists, at lower cost."


David Brooks does not know what he is talking about...

Members don't see this ad.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users
Interesting article. Obviously the NP line is crap, but the overall thesis is sound. It’s a good counterpoint to much of the SDN dogma which often suggests that it’s easy for non physicians to get rich. Also a good reminder for those thinking about skipping residency and going a non clinical route that only a few percent get as far as more docs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
This is once again a prime example why this obsession over “the 1%” is misguided and a distraction to paint a target on the working rich (docs, lawyers) that barely make the cut to reach the 1%, instead of targeting the root problem being the owner class that are also a part of the 1%, but make 10-10,000x more than those pesky physicians and lawyers per year.

Mr. Brooks knows exactly what he is doing publishing this article.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10 users
Members don't see this ad :)


"Once you’re a doctor, you are protected by state laws from competition from lower cost workers. Rothwell cites research suggesting that nurse practitioners and dental hygienists can perform many duties now done by doctors and dentists, at lower cost."


David Brooks does not know what he is talking about...
Oh it's a random oped :(

If there's another bad news reporting from NYT, pls post it.
 
I like how he says to get into a job that's hard to get into, like that's easy to begin with 🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Interesting article. Obviously the NP line is crap, but the overall thesis is sound. It’s a good counterpoint to much of the SDN dogma which often suggests that it’s easy for non physicians to get rich. Also a good reminder for those thinking about skipping residency and going a non clinical route that only a few percent get as far as more docs.
A nurse practitioner making over 80k is rich. Much easier to get in and thru. Less liability.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Ew York Times wants to sweep aside the barriers to medicine set up by rich evil doctors and let the free market sort it out?

I bet this guy would throw a tantrum and demand to see a doctor if an NP walked into his or his family member's room. Then refuse to be seen by a resident, demand to see an attending, ask the attending for their credentials, and then insinuate they better do as asked or he will call his hospital board member buddy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Well, that's what it looks like when a op-ed writer has a chip on his shoulder and puts in minimal effort. He doesn't actually want to live in a world where anybody can practice medicine.
 
This is once again a prime example why this obsession over “the 1%” is misguided and a distraction to paint a target on the working rich (docs, lawyers) that barely make the cut to reach the 1%, instead of targeting the root problem being the owner class that are also a part of the 1%, but make 10-10,000x more than those pesky physicians and lawyers per year.

Mr. Brooks knows exactly what he is doing publishing this article.
I don't begrudge anyone how much they earn, even the billionaires. Elon works his butt off
 


"Once you’re a doctor, you are protected by state laws from competition from lower cost workers. Rothwell cites research suggesting that nurse practitioners and dental hygienists can perform many duties now done by doctors and dentists, at lower cost."


David Brooks does not know what he is talking about...
This is about protecting turf, and hidden behind a paywall...
 
Top