- Joined
- Aug 20, 2007
- Messages
- 732
- Reaction score
- 1
It won't be a "stress" interview. I have been through many interviews this cycle and I have a question about what are the proper procedures for a person who is interviewing beyond the scope of the intended interview. Although my avatar would suggest I am a baby let me assure you this is not something I enjoy bringing up but rather would like to know what you all think about this situation. I believe it happens to people probably every interview day it is just that we are too scared to step up and say something in fear of obviously "GETTING REJECTED."
Case in point. And let me just say that this interview was not by a faculty member but rather a medical student. OK, long story short the interviewer seemed to have prejudged the interview into questioning my comitment into being a doctor and if I could handle the course work. My stats are fine GPA could be higher I guess but it is well on par for the school as well as the MCATS so stats weren't a problem. But rather, this person was actually questioning the undergraduate institution I attended, i.e. calling it "easy to get good grades there." And I mean we didn't get off the subject per se for about a good 20-30 minutes. The person had my file highlighted in big yellow highlighted marker. The other questions became rhetorical as hell, such as asking me if I had been published (NO), did I have a masters (NO), and what was I doing in school (graduating.) These were obvious DUH questions because the person had MY FILE HIGHLIGHTED. In context of an example, when the person was asking about getting a masters I had first thought he was saying I should have not been in the interview and that I should be working on a masters. I was about to lose it right there. I was thinking in my mind why did they call me for this interview? If you didn't like my application why call me to travel and spend time here. Alas, he (sorry lost the person he is shorter) was asking if I was working on a masters but just in a snide super rhetorical fashion. My jaw almost dropped it was such a duh question for no where in my application did it say I was working on a masters. At one point in the interview, because I do interview very well, I replied back with how to treat people and be empathetic to people's situations is a cornerstone of being a physician in the first place. It was sort of a throw back to him saying, wow buddy I see what you are doing and it is not going to work.
Yes, I held my composure and I believe interviewed very well albeit the circumstances. But my point is this, the person obviously had a bias what in the world should I do? I interviewed earlier in the day and it went AWESOME the person asked the same questions, tough questions, but just in a professional manner. Furthermore, this guy was pompous as they come. You could tell from the "that school was easy" comment that he just had the attitude I was inferior. Lastly, the true reason why felt betrayed by the process is because the person interviewing before me went to a much better school, as most kids did that day and interviewed with the exact same guy and said it went super well. "He asked me a few questions and then put my file away and just talked to me."
Wow!
At the end of the interviewer it was explained to us that if anything negative happened in the interview please please please let me know. This will not be held against you and blah blah blah. Yea right. Who is going to do that? My frustration is why did a medical student have my file in the first place? I mean if I was an adcom I guess all hot chicks would be admitted to my school. No, I am not being serious but in reality how is a person, overachiever or not, supposed to take that much responsibility of opinion and judgement to actually have a person's file and give a fair unbiased assessment. I walked out of that interview feeling violated. I wanted to go to the office and ask for my travel expenses and room & board back. I feel I should not have to complain about an interviewers conduct.
The funny thing is I understand it was an open file interview but I thought that was just for faculty, not a young adcom who was a med student. I understand that med students do interviews and I TOTALLY agree with this but not in any way shape or form should they have a persons file. There is too much responsibility and ambiguity that can take place with that type of privileged information.
My question is, and for the benefit of other people who have been put in situations like this, what do you do? Do you shut up and take it or do you actually do something about it? For those of you who have done something what did you do and what was the outcome and would you do it again? Lastly, some people might not like any pressure at all and think the tiniest question of pressure is a big deal what is and not appropriate to happen in an interview for our own protections and rights?
I might get flamed for this by people who think, Stop complaining but so be it. I know that in all the umpteen interviews I have had in my life, that was the most unprofessional and biased interview I have ever faced.
Case in point. And let me just say that this interview was not by a faculty member but rather a medical student. OK, long story short the interviewer seemed to have prejudged the interview into questioning my comitment into being a doctor and if I could handle the course work. My stats are fine GPA could be higher I guess but it is well on par for the school as well as the MCATS so stats weren't a problem. But rather, this person was actually questioning the undergraduate institution I attended, i.e. calling it "easy to get good grades there." And I mean we didn't get off the subject per se for about a good 20-30 minutes. The person had my file highlighted in big yellow highlighted marker. The other questions became rhetorical as hell, such as asking me if I had been published (NO), did I have a masters (NO), and what was I doing in school (graduating.) These were obvious DUH questions because the person had MY FILE HIGHLIGHTED. In context of an example, when the person was asking about getting a masters I had first thought he was saying I should have not been in the interview and that I should be working on a masters. I was about to lose it right there. I was thinking in my mind why did they call me for this interview? If you didn't like my application why call me to travel and spend time here. Alas, he (sorry lost the person he is shorter) was asking if I was working on a masters but just in a snide super rhetorical fashion. My jaw almost dropped it was such a duh question for no where in my application did it say I was working on a masters. At one point in the interview, because I do interview very well, I replied back with how to treat people and be empathetic to people's situations is a cornerstone of being a physician in the first place. It was sort of a throw back to him saying, wow buddy I see what you are doing and it is not going to work.
Yes, I held my composure and I believe interviewed very well albeit the circumstances. But my point is this, the person obviously had a bias what in the world should I do? I interviewed earlier in the day and it went AWESOME the person asked the same questions, tough questions, but just in a professional manner. Furthermore, this guy was pompous as they come. You could tell from the "that school was easy" comment that he just had the attitude I was inferior. Lastly, the true reason why felt betrayed by the process is because the person interviewing before me went to a much better school, as most kids did that day and interviewed with the exact same guy and said it went super well. "He asked me a few questions and then put my file away and just talked to me."
Wow!
At the end of the interviewer it was explained to us that if anything negative happened in the interview please please please let me know. This will not be held against you and blah blah blah. Yea right. Who is going to do that? My frustration is why did a medical student have my file in the first place? I mean if I was an adcom I guess all hot chicks would be admitted to my school. No, I am not being serious but in reality how is a person, overachiever or not, supposed to take that much responsibility of opinion and judgement to actually have a person's file and give a fair unbiased assessment. I walked out of that interview feeling violated. I wanted to go to the office and ask for my travel expenses and room & board back. I feel I should not have to complain about an interviewers conduct.
The funny thing is I understand it was an open file interview but I thought that was just for faculty, not a young adcom who was a med student. I understand that med students do interviews and I TOTALLY agree with this but not in any way shape or form should they have a persons file. There is too much responsibility and ambiguity that can take place with that type of privileged information.
My question is, and for the benefit of other people who have been put in situations like this, what do you do? Do you shut up and take it or do you actually do something about it? For those of you who have done something what did you do and what was the outcome and would you do it again? Lastly, some people might not like any pressure at all and think the tiniest question of pressure is a big deal what is and not appropriate to happen in an interview for our own protections and rights?
I might get flamed for this by people who think, Stop complaining but so be it. I know that in all the umpteen interviews I have had in my life, that was the most unprofessional and biased interview I have ever faced.