How to stop a patient from rambling?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

DrMaccoman

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
May 17, 2014
Messages
57
Reaction score
80
Hi,

Sometimes I have great patients who answer my questions directly and are perfect. Other times that is not the case. I'm not on my clerkship yet, but we still see a patient on a weekly basis to perform our HPI/Physicals.

I was wondering if you guys have any tips on cutting folks off respectfully when they start providing information not pertinent to the chief complaint?
note I know this is the real world and this is something to be expected, but here is an example: I asked the patient what brings you in today and instead of giving me a quick description of her chief complaint (chest tightness), she went on and on and instead of talking about why she was in the hospital and about the chest tightness, she started to jump all over the place and started talking about her lupus and how she was suppose to get a mammogram etc...

During the Review of Systems, she would always elaborate on everything ie when I asked her if she has had any eye problems including cataracts or glaucoma, instead of acknowledging the cataracts and when it was diagnosed, she started talking about her optometrist appointment and the whole she bang about how she started getting cataracts x years ago and her thoughts about it all without any of my elicitation...

Oh and she also took 2 phone calls during the interview and made me wait T.T. But things like this happen all the time in the hospital that I go to.
While I appreciate the full history, we only have so much time to interview a patient. How can I respectfully direct my patients to answer my most important questions? without going on a tangent/giving extraneous info for every single question that I ask?

Thanks! Looking for constructive comments only!
 
Last edited:
I really don't have much more experience than you do, but have you tried:

1. Setting the schedule ("We have 15 minutes to talk today")
2. Setting the agenda ("Because we don't have much time, can you list the things that brought you in today/that are the most important that we discuss so I can make sure to cover them/etc")
3. Interrupting by mirroring/repeating (Pt: "...and that's about the time my Lupus starting acting up and --" *Interrupt* You: "Ok I definitely want to hear more about when your Lupus started acting up, but first can you tell me more about what happened after you woke up short of breath?")

And anyone who actually does have experience, please let me know if this stuff actually works, thanks.
 
This is tough because I've seen attendings who let the rambling happen and others that don't. I'd prefer to ask pointed questions but there is too much to gain from open-ended ones such as, "what brings you in." Some people just ramble though, no matter what you do. I agree with CaliforniaDreamer though that redirecting the patient in a respectful manner would probably be most useful. "I would like to discuss your lupus further ,but first I want to address what concerns me most: your complaint of chest pain." No shame in that.
 
Hi,

Sometimes I have great patients who answer my questions directly and are perfect. Other times that is not the case. I'm not on my clerkship yet, but we still see a patient on a weekly basis to perform our HPI/Physicals.

I was wondering if you guys have any tips on cutting folks off respectfully when they start providing information not pertinent to the chief complaint?
note I know this is the real world and this is something to be expected, but here is an example: I asked the patient what brings you in today and instead of giving me a quick description of her chief complaint (chest tightness), she went on and on and instead of talking about why she was in the hospital and about the chest tightness, she started to jump all over the place and started talking about her lupus and how she was suppose to get a mammogram etc...

During the Review of Systems, she would always elaborate on everything ie when I asked her if she has had any eye problems including cataracts or glaucoma, instead of acknowledging the cataracts and when it was diagnosed, she started talking about her optometrist appointment and the whole she bang about how she started getting cataracts x years ago and her thoughts about it all without any of my elicitation...

Oh and she also took 2 phone calls during the interview and made me wait T.T. But things like this happen all the time in the hospital that I go to.
While I appreciate the full history, we only have so much time to interview a patient. How can I respectfully direct my patients to answer my most important questions? without going on a tangent/giving extraneous info for every single question that I ask?

Thanks! Looking for constructive comments only!
Lol. Welcome to the joys of medicine, for better or worse
 
I really don't have much more experience than you do, but have you tried:

1. Setting the schedule ("We have 15 minutes to talk today")
2. Setting the agenda ("Because we don't have much time, can you list the things that brought you in today/that are the most important that we discuss so I can make sure to cover them/etc")
3. Interrupting by mirroring/repeating (Pt: "...and that's about the time my Lupus starting acting up and --" *Interrupt* You: "Ok I definitely want to hear more about when your Lupus started acting up, but first can you tell me more about what happened after you woke up short of breath?")

And anyone who actually does have experience, please let me know if this stuff actually works, thanks.

Thanks. I think redirecting is great. However, I think the patient thought her lupus was related to her SOB. Using specific words might be better rather than open ended for sure!

For diet/exercise questions or social history questions, how do you go about asking them?

I usually ask can you tell me about your diet.. are you eating fruits and vegetables... However, sometimes patients go into extreme detail ie the above patient told me that she likes to eat broccoli, but not cauliflowers. She tries some oranges and sometimes some apples, but she really likes corn (i tried to cut her off by saying, so It seems like you eat a healthy diet, to. whcih she responded, NO I eat a lot of friend foods and went on about her fried foods...)
 
This is tough because I've seen attendings who let the rambling happen and others that don't. I'd prefer to ask pointed questions but there is too much to gain from open-ended ones such as, "what brings you in." Some people just ramble though, no matter what you do. I agree with CaliforniaDreamer though that redirecting the patient in a respectful manner would probably be most useful. "I would like to discuss your lupus further ,but first I want to address what concerns me most: your complaint of chest pain." No shame in that.
You'll eventually learn when not to use the "what brings you in" opener. It's mostly for standardized patients
 
You'll eventually learn when not to use the "what brings you in" opener.
I think it is fine to use if you are decent at redirection. I dont advocate interrupting the patient but unless they are manic there will be plenty of opportunities to interject and use something they say as a segue to a new topic or question.
 
I think it is fine to use if you are decent at redirection. I dont advocate interrupting the patient but unless they are manic there will be plenty of opportunities to interject and use something they say as a segue to a new topic or question.
That's probably part of the reason I don't use it anymore. I don't like interrupting, so I kind of prefer to set the pace of the encounter
 
Thanks. I think redirecting is great. However, I think the patient thought her lupus was related to her SOB. Using specific words might be better rather than open ended for sure!

For diet/exercise questions or social history questions, how do you go about asking them?

I usually ask can you tell me about your diet.. are you eating fruits and vegetables... However, sometimes patients go into extreme detail ie the above patient told me that she likes to eat broccoli, but not cauliflowers. She tries some oranges and sometimes some apples, but she really likes corn (i tried to cut her off by saying, so It seems like you eat a healthy diet, to. whcih she responded, NO I eat a lot of friend foods and went on about her fried foods...)

In the real world, you most likely won't do that.

Social history goes like this - Where do you live? Do you smoke now? Ever? How much per day? Same with Alcohol/Rec. Drugs.

Open ended is good for HPI but when patients are a bunch of blah blah without substance you need to do focused questions. Past medical history and Med List is generally a cross-match game of line up the medication to the diagnosis.

Pt: "Doctor I have no medical problems and I'm not the father"
Dr. Maury: Well this medication list says you have at least hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia, and you ARE the father"
 
I think there's a disconnect between how we are taught to examine/interview patients and how we actually do it. Yes, be polite and warm at all times but don't worry about interrupting if they start rambling.

The problem is that on the test though, it seems like there's one way. Talk sweet and don't ever interrupt the patient because in reality the person you're interrupting is the one who has the power to fail you.

When you're interviewing the patient, the first priority is still to make the patient feel welcomed and safe, but a close second is practicality. You're now actually being given some responsibility in a real patient's care and you need to have all the information for when the attending asks that detailed question that may change management. If the patient is fixating on how textures of apples hurts their teeth which makes their SOB worse and they're coming in with repeated CHF exacerbation, interrupt, apologize for interrupting, and TELL THEM WHY you think this is unlikely and what you two need to focus on.

At times (especially psych) you should interrupt less because sometimes what they say can also open up options about certain conditions. Also, I'm not advocating for always interrupting the patient. Making that decision comes with practice. Try to keep things conversational instead of coming in trying to collect facts because that's how people naturally talk. If you go in collecting facts the patient will want to have more of a conversation so let them have it while interrupting them politely when things get obviously off track.




Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile
 
Just say you're sorry to interrupt but you'd really like to talk about x. Never had a patient get upset about it you're still talking about their problems
 
I know this is ahead of where you're at so just put your head down and get thru this bull, but in the real world, no one asks about diet.

I could write a book about this but I think that pre-clinical patient care education is adding tons of bull to the curriculum that is impractical. Even a nursing student can be complete on a history and may even do a better job than a medical student when counseling the patient to eat healthy.

In the hospital, it's your job to figure out what's wrong and ultimately you as a future physician you will be held accountable if things aren't figured out. I think it's a much better idea to give students simulation cases where the patient has a problem like an MI or COPD, give them 5-10 minutes like you get in the real world, and grade them on whether they got/asked the 5-10 pertinent things that were important given the situation.

You're going to be so useless in the hospital if you just go in without thinking and just focus on being complete. I think learning this kind of focused though process is so much more valuable than regurgitating a patient questionnaire.


Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile
 
I know this is ahead of where you're at so just put your head down and get thru this bull, but in the real world, no one asks about diet.

I could write a book about this but I think that pre-clinical patient care education is adding tons of bull to the curriculum that is impractical. Even a nursing student can be complete on a history and may even do a better job than a medical student when counseling the patient to eat healthy.

In the hospital, it's your job to figure out what's wrong and ultimately you as a future physician you will be held accountable if things aren't figured out. I think it's a much better idea to give students simulation cases where the patient has a problem like an MI or COPD, give them 5-10 minutes like you get in the real world, and grade them on whether they got/asked the 5-10 pertinent things that were important given the situation.

You're going to be so useless in the hospital if you just go in without thinking and just focus on being complete. I think learning this kind of focused though process is so much more valuable than regurgitating a patient questionnaire.


Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile

I beg to differ. I think I learned a valuable lesson about not focusing solely on the problem, but being complete so you can get hidden cues. Patients can come in with abdominal pain, but if you soley focus on it and not being complete, you will miss the Dx of depression.
 
Hi, I'm going to give you some advice that may seem harsh but it was given to me when I was in medical school and helped a lot, so don't take offense as it may help you too. Based on what you wrote here, especially the part about patients taking multiple phone calls during the interview, you aren't presenting yourself as assertive or confident. The patient then views you as a non important part of the care and does whatever they want. Try observing surgeons and ER docs and you'll see what I mean. They can teach you the opposite end of the spectrum (being incredibly efficient) and many still manage to be quite personable.

I beg to differ. I think I learned a valuable lesson about not focusing solely on the problem, but being complete so you can get hidden cues. Patients can come in with abdominal pain, but if you soley focus on it and not being complete, you will miss the Dx of depression.

This basically never happens. Backtothebasics8 is correct here and making a lot of good points. for the most part it's completely inappropriate to screen for undiagnosed depression on your initial h&p for abdominal pain until you have ruled out more serious medical conditions, unless there is a clear setting of overdose or substance abuse (or they stabbed themself).

It also goes back to your original problem--because you address so many issues unrelated to the chief complaint, the patient views the h&p as unfocused so they just ramble and talk about whatever they want. The problem is an an early med student it's hard to tell what is related and what isn't, and this will just improve with time.

Do it thoroughly and "regurgitate he questionnaire" on standardized exams and tests, but it really becomes obvious the few situations where you do that in real life. Eventually you will become more efficient and confident leading to better responses from the patient, and learn the best way to ask questions. Good luck it's a hard journey and you seem smart
 
Last edited:
I beg to differ. I think I learned a valuable lesson about not focusing solely on the problem, but being complete so you can get hidden cues. Patients can come in with abdominal pain, but if you soley focus on it and not being complete, you will miss the Dx of depression.
So?
 
Most patients have no idea they are rambling. It's kind of a frontal thing.

If there's ever a quick pause, I jump right in and ask the next question. Having a confident demeanor helps.

Don't be afraid to offend. They know the deal. Be polite, but be real.

Also, prioritize: IV drug use is much more important than knowing their second cousin has pancreatic cancer. Go time.
 
Thanks. I think redirecting is great. However, I think the patient thought her lupus was related to her SOB. Using specific words might be better rather than open ended for sure!

For diet/exercise questions or social history questions, how do you go about asking them?

I usually ask can you tell me about your diet.. are you eating fruits and vegetables... However, sometimes patients go into extreme detail ie the above patient told me that she likes to eat broccoli, but not cauliflowers. She tries some oranges and sometimes some apples, but she really likes corn (i tried to cut her off by saying, so It seems like you eat a healthy diet, to. whcih she responded, NO I eat a lot of friend foods and went on about her fried foods...)
"What's your diet like"
"I like broccoli, but not cauliflowers, and try oranges and occasionally..."
"But just in general, would you say you get enough fruits and vegetables? Do you eat healthy?"
"Oh... I mean, I try, but not so much... Usually I eat terribly but I get maybe two or three good salads in a week and I..."
"Seems good, but how about alcohol and tobacco?"
"Oh I don't smoke, or drink. My dad was a chain-smoking alcoholic, scared me away from the..."
"Oh, lots of smoke in the house, that reminds me, do you have any allergies?"
"Oh, to grass and mold and pets and..."
"How about to medication?"
"Tylenol makes me piss purple, it's the strangest..."
"Just to make sure, what do you do for a living?"
"Oh I'm a..."

It's all about redirecting. You don't even have to do it masterfully, as they're often so lost in their own words that they don't even realize much of what you're saying when you reel them in, they just answer your question with another story.
 
I struggled with this the most as med student, and had to learn brutality in residency

Luckily with residency, you will walk into the room with a palpable aura of stress, pressure, rush, urgency and you will even be talking faster as a result, when you think about mirror neurons, all these things a patient can pick up on.

One of the first things I say is, and it comes off as a well practiced rattle (yours too will with time)

"Hello, I'm student doctor ___ and I'll be helping you today. As I understand it, you're here for ___ today" (you almost never go in cold without a CC) [doesn't matter if it's wrong, and actually, don't let the patient interrupt you to correct, this "steamrolling" you're doing at the start is setting the tone]
"I apologize ahead of time if I seem curt & keep interrupting you a lot, I don't mean to be rude, and it's not that I don't care about what you have to tell me, it's just that we have a lot to cover so I can be sure to get all the info I need to help you best, so we can get you feeling better as quickly as we can. So tell me about your ___, [insert follow up question that's yes/no] Example: "Tell me about your chest pain, are you having shortness of breath?"

If the CC is totally of, or the SOB has nothing to do with CP, here they can correct you.

(RE: my intro speech:
One of my fave lines about being a doctor from med school: it's all about managing expectations. Never forget that.

1) before you have had a chance to offend the patient you've apologized
2) you've given them an "expectation" of what your behavior is, and given a very benign reason for it
3) you've reassured them you care
4) if they bristle at being cut off, reassure them that there will be a chance to tell you whatever they want AFTER you get what you need

I remember being taught, that most patients are used to this "transactional" style of communication from doctors. Even the way that you see a personable ED doc take a history, if you were to say, use that style with your spouse's Gramma at Sunday dinnner... well no one would talk to a friend that way.

You have to learn a NEW way of communicating that is basically unlike any other normal way of communicating that you have learned to date.
It's an interrogation, and most patients understand that, especially from doctors.)

I give a little more leeway for HPI. Still, I go in with a mission:
OLD CARTS
have you had ever before, what did you try/take at home
ROS
PMASF
It's written on my paper, it's in my template note.

For HPI/OLD CARTS
I have to ask and feel satisfied in what I get about each one before I "allow" the patient to tell me more.
Each one might raise more questions I have, and if a patient is telling you stuff that is useful, ie: is fill great.
It doesn't have to be in order. You get used to jumping around as data comes out of their mouth.

But having the above letters on my paper I can just fill out the form as they go and I'm less likely to forget stuff.
If you're in a computer, you might have to be more rigid about cutting them off and having them answer your questions as you ask them.

For any CC, I have a series of pertinent positives, negatives, and questions that need to be asked. Learning those will template your interaction. They will also let you know if you need to go down a different pathway re: the CC. You get better at knowing the specific set of questions for MI vs PE vs COPD exacerbation vs heartburn vs aortic dissection vs pericarditis vs ....... which helps you extract pertinent info from patients.

For CP, I have to ask about SOB, quality of pain (pressure), radiation. There's a lot more, but if 2 of 3 are positive I can't remember the PPV for MI, but it's super high. So I gotta cover those FOR SURE before we talk about any of the tangents that might come up related to those questions. Of course I need to ask n/v, etc re: CP.

When I get to ROS, the stuff that I wasn't super excited to know in uber detail re: CC
I tell them "I'm going ask you a bunch of yes or no questions,"
If they give me a yes, you learn how to ask follow up questions to get to more info re: vision that you care about.

If you go in with a mission of fill in the blank, checkbox, and you try to fill them in order, and you are get good at little filler things to say before just cutting someone off and asking your next question, you will get more efficient.

In a way, I would do the oppositite of what you're taught:
Start off with an agenda, pertinent pointed questions
ask a lot of yes/no questions, and THEN depending on what you catch, go from closed --> open

If what they are telling me sound medically pertinent but wasn't what I asked, that's fine.
If I know it's truly meaningless, "No, I'm not having any CP. Speaking of chest pain, my neighbor has to--"
I IMMEDIATELY SHUT THAT DOWN. In that case I don't even segue, if the first part I got what I wanted and now it's this, I immediately go for the next data point I want. "Are you having any SOB?"

As a med student, I wasn't always sure what info I even needed. I kinda had to be a human wastebasket of questions and drivel just to start learning how to weed through it and what to ask. As you get better at CC: and what you need to know, you will learn to go in a room and just extract it with rapid fire questions. You won't sit there trying to think, "what else should I ask?" you'll walk in already with 20 questions, and every answer you'll know what 5 follow up to do.

Doing some ED rotations REALLY helped me learn this. Coffee can help too.

1 phone call:
I probably look either annoyed, or I point to the door and mouth, "would you like me to go?"
Usually this gives a clue it's rude and I don't have to leave.
I probably have talked to them enough to have some stuff to write on my paper/EHR so they usually are not wasting my time.
However, when they get off the phone, I am likely to say, "Oh I'm sorry, would you like me to go?"
If you get anything other than an answer you like, you can always add, "it's OK, I can step out, it just might take longer for you to be seen by ___insert superior/get care if we don't continue through this in a timely fashion. I need to know as there are other patients waiting as well."
Not rude, but you're outlining consequences for wasting your time and they will be more likely to silence the next call.

If they don't now it's call 2, then you really should walk out, even if for just one minute for show. This is not bad doctoring. It really is to their benefit to prioritize this interview and you are not benefitting the patient by making this behavior OK, so it is for them, not you.
If they had me leave the room the first time, when I come back, I might say, "I think it's really important that we get through this interview to get you care in a timely fashion. Do you think we can continue uninterrupted?"

If all of the above isn't enough pressure to get them to quit with the phone, I don't know what to tell you.
IRL if the patient was not having an emergency, and you were not a student, the physicians would basically leave the patient for as long as was not harmful to workflow to go do other work, and basically forget them (barring safety).
If it were the ED or a more urgent situation, you could be much more blunt, and say, "I am trying to make sure you're not having a life-threatening emergency. I'm going to have to ask that for your own safety that you silence your phone until I can finish talking to you and make sure that you're safe. Once we know you're safe you can let other people know."

TLDR:
Start with my opening speech at the top
Don't be afraid to interrogate, interrupt
Go in with a mission and a list
 
Yeah this really gets at the heart of the art of medicine. There are some patients who will out-ninja even the most experienced redirectors and still manage to give a 30 minute HPI and equally painful pan-positive ROS. In general though there are many ways to be more efficient and personally I'm still refining mine.

A few of my current thoughts:

1) everything hinges on the opener. As a sub specialty consulting service, for ED patients I tend to start with something like "so I hear you've been having (------). When did that start?" I just focus on the meat of what I've been asked to evaluate rather than ask too many completely open ended questions.

2) for clinic patients it is similar. I never walk in a room where I don't know why that person is there. Obviously people seeing completely undifferentiated patients have a different set of challenges. But for us, I think patients really want to focus on why they were referred. I think walking in to a new patient with a new cancer diagnosis and asking them broadly what brings them in today kinda makes me look like an idiot. Instead I just introduce myself, tell them I'm sorry they're meeting me, and then start asking about their cancer and things relevant to it.

3) for the multiple complaint patient: if I get someone who comes in for A but then brings up B, I cut them off immediately after they bring up B and restate both A and B and then ask them what other concerns they have because I want to make a list and be sure I cover everything. I then cut off again after every new complaint before they have a chance to go into any detail. Once I have a full list of their relevant issues, I have a better sense of what I'm dealing with and then I pick the most pertinent one to start with and start ask open but focused questions clearly about problem A. Lather rinse repeat. Basically I take a focused HPI for each complaint.

4) for ros, I always make it clear what timeframe I care about. I also think that some pan-positive ROS patients do so because they feel they aren't being taken seriously, so establishing rapport and asking good questions in the HPI can help reassure them, that you are going to take them seriously and be thorough.

5) I'll frequently do the ROS during the physical exam. Not only does it help remind me what to ask about, but there are many opportunities during the exam to interrupt and redirect them. And there's nothing like a good oropharyngeal exam to stop a story that's gone way off the rails!

6) I've had a few patients where they really had some underlying completely unrelated diagnosis. The psych ones are pretty easy to catch. You get the gut feeling and notice their affect, and then it's just a matter of a decent psych interview and it usually reveals the issue. I was lucky that I feel like I got some especially good psych training as a student and I think I do this rather well. Even here, the questions are rather focused as you basically cover the major domains of psychiatric illness. For non psych things, it's really more about having a good Ddx in your head early on and letting that guide you.

7) if I'm super pressed for time or the issue is more emergent, i just start with the exam and ask pointed question while examining them. Sometimes I'll even say something about how I'm sorry for being so short but that I'm concerned this may be something urgent and I need to get a good exam quickly.

8) lots of what they tell you to ask as students is generally irrelevant, except the parts that aren't. I won't ask the potential emergent airway patient about their diet history, but I may ask a number of questions about food and beverage choices to the clinic patient with tinnitus.

I've found that patient tend to react well to being cut off and redirected IF they feel like I've still been thorough and have a solid understanding of their story. A good thorough physical exam is also quite reassuring to the talkative folks. Even so, I still find some that defy all the odds and manage to waste a lot of time. Sometimes you really do have to hope your buddy will send you a rescue page!
 
I think thats some good advice above!

Only thing, I've never heard anyone say "student doctor". In my past life before medical field, I'd probably have to ask for clarification, if was a patient - so are you a student or a doctor? If I heard that phrase today, I'd probably cringe on the inside!


Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile app
 
I think thats some good advice above!

Only thing, I've never heard anyone say "student doctor". In my past life before medical field, I'd probably have to ask for clarification, if was a patient - so are you a student or a doctor? If I heard that phrase today, I'd probably cringe on the inside!

I hate saying it but can't deny it works so much better than medical student in terms of not getting booted from the room


Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile app
 
I think thats some good advice above!

Only thing, I've never heard anyone say "student doctor". In my past life before medical field, I'd probably have to ask for clarification, if was a patient - so are you a student or a doctor? If I heard that phrase today, I'd probably cringe on the inside!


Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile app

In my experience patients don't usually question it.
If they do, then you say you are a medical student studying to be a doctor.

It's a totally legit term, and I've been pushing it wherever possible. Especially scenarios where patients are more likely to boot students from rooms. It's totally fair, students are treated as optional, yes yes patient autonomy to kick them out, but the med student-pt interaction is care for the patient, not just education for the student. Doctors need to sell it as such to benefit both.

Like I said, it's all about managing expectations.
 
For diet/exercise questions or social history questions, how do you go about asking them?

I usually ask can you tell me about your diet.. are you eating fruits and vegetables... However, sometimes patients go into extreme detail ie the above patient told me that she likes to eat broccoli, but not cauliflowers. She tries some oranges and sometimes some apples, but she really likes corn (i tried to cut her off by saying, so It seems like you eat a healthy diet, to. whcih she responded, NO I eat a lot of friend foods and went on about her fried foods...)[/QUOTE]

I think you got everything you need right here.

DDx

1. Kray Kray
 
The preceptor I am with is really good, I've noticed that when the patient starts the ramble he shows his understanding with big nods, a few "right, right, I understands" and quickly asks another question "but are you feeling this" or something to redirect.

I have never been more annoyed than in internal doing an H&P and someone finds relevance in an obscure similar cough aunt Betty had two years before she died. Or was it three years. Well, it was the winter before Harry built the barn, and that had to have been 2011. I think her doctor told her she had the namonia. I didn't like him, I went and saw him and I just didn't like the man, you know what I mean...
 
OP just document "history limited by circumstantial thought process" and enter a psych consult.
 
I usually ask one open ended question the entire interview. Usually the first thing I open with "Ive been asked to see you because of X, tell me how X happened" or "how was last night". After that everything is closed-ended, precise questions. I might at the end of the interview ask "anything else you need to tell me?". The key is knowing the questions to ask, which you gain with experience.

Asking all open-ended questions is only to pass OSCE's during medical school/step 2 CS.
 
I'm in psych but so maybe a somewhat different context though still in the hospital- early in appointments I apologize ahead of time -- "sorry if interrupt; please don't be offended- I just know you're quite concerned with x,y,z and want to make sure we get to all of the relevant details in our time together. So now, please tell me about..." and then interrupt as much as I feel I need to.
 
OP - for diet

COMPLETE SHORT VERSION
I might ask, what do you eat in a typical day?
blah blah blah, I get a sense
Do you usually eat breakfast?
Maybe they say they skip meals
That segues to, Do you often skip meals?
excuses excuses
Segues to, Do you snack often?
What do you usually snack on?
My favorite, How much soda do you drink in a typical day or week?
How much water?
How much tea/coffee? Lots of stuff in it? Do you think it affects your mood? Your sleep?
Do you cook at home? Processed foods?
How much fruit & veggies?
How much do you go out to eat? Fast food?
What do you do for protein?
Dairy?

SHORT SHORT VERSION
"Do you think you eat healthy?"
"How do you do with fruits and veggies?
"Soda?"
How many meals or snacks? What sorta thing?
Fast food?
Protein?
Dairy?

Often at some point they start apologizing, making excuses, etc, I cut that off by saying, "yeah, it's really hard to get breakfast in, but it's important," "yeah it's hard with you're busy to ____" "Yeah it's hard to find time to cook/pack a lunch" "It's OK let's just figure out what you eat and then we can talk about ways to be healthier." These are my "cut off, please spit it out lines."

That's what I ask about because that's really what I need to know to do some counseling.
From the above you figure out what could be improved. It helps that I usually have tons of ideas for the above and will include that stuff in the AVS (after visit summary) that is now a meaningful use thing that medicare places can get dinged on.
There is usually a stock printout but I think, what's the point of the interview above if you don't address with good simple ideas what you gathered?

More than a lot of stuff, if you were able to type up some stuff that the doc could cut and paste for this AVS you would be doing the pt, doc, and system a big service.

Breakfast skipping - try getting one thing in, a packet of instant oatmeal, a piece of fruit, some hard-boiled eggs made up before, cereal. Some protein is ideal. (not saying this is ideal, but I'm addressing breakfast skipping, which is usually do to lack of time/laziness, or some just don't feel hungry in the am)
Meal skipping/snacking - try to make up food ahead of time for tupperware, or keep healthy snacks. Granola bars, fruit, nuts, hard boiled eggs.
Try to cut down on soda or drink diet, crystal light, other low calorie beverages. Fruit juice is better than soda but fruit is better than juice, and increasing water is best of all. (don't have illusions they are giving up sweet drinks even at 350 lbs. Start small.) If lactose tolerant, try drinking low fat milk or keffir.
Fat free yogurt and cottage cheese.
I don't address coffee/tea unless it's a crazy amount or it's affecting them clinically. In fact, it has an appetite suppressant effect, which you can decide is a good thing or a bad thing re: their eating habits. You can encourage them to use lower fat milk if they're drinking these Starbuck 1000 calories things.

(Do you cook at home? Processed foods?
How much fruit & veggies?
How much do you go out to eat? Fast food?
What do you do for protein?)
- you can figure out how to advise here.

If they are the right age, for cooking at home or ideas on the above I encourage them to use google if they can.
If they're old, then I might suggest trying to find a cookbook.

TLDR:
If nothing else, I always go after soda. That in my opinion is the great killer of the nation.
And fast food.
 
Top