- Joined
- Aug 23, 2006
- Messages
- 11
- Reaction score
- 0
Hi everyone, i hope no one has asked this question before otherwise i will appear almost as foolish as i actually am.
I am a first year med student, and i have begun to use some textbooks alongside class, correction, i try to use class alongside textbooks haha. I have also kept the first aid book open as i read, to try and fill it in so when i come back to it i have a semi-complete source to review from. I actually got my FA book de-bound and put into a binder so i can stick loose leaf into it, so if anyone didnt think of that yet, its a really useful idea. Anyway, my question is, is it sufficient to read the text and elaborate on the topics in the first aid book or is it necessary to elaborate on topics that FA never mentioned as well? the reason why i ask this is because i have a very difficult time figuring out what to extract from books, and i felt that the FA gives me a good guideline as to what topics i should elaborate on. An example of what i mean is in a typical neurohisto chapter of a book, itll go into so many technical details about the density of the presynaptic end vs the post, and it goes into depth about retro/anterograde transport, but the FA talks more about supporting cells so i say to myself, okay ill just extract any more info i think is important about supporting cells, so i use the FA as a guide. I hope i have explained my question properly and clearly.
Thank you for your help.
I am a first year med student, and i have begun to use some textbooks alongside class, correction, i try to use class alongside textbooks haha. I have also kept the first aid book open as i read, to try and fill it in so when i come back to it i have a semi-complete source to review from. I actually got my FA book de-bound and put into a binder so i can stick loose leaf into it, so if anyone didnt think of that yet, its a really useful idea. Anyway, my question is, is it sufficient to read the text and elaborate on the topics in the first aid book or is it necessary to elaborate on topics that FA never mentioned as well? the reason why i ask this is because i have a very difficult time figuring out what to extract from books, and i felt that the FA gives me a good guideline as to what topics i should elaborate on. An example of what i mean is in a typical neurohisto chapter of a book, itll go into so many technical details about the density of the presynaptic end vs the post, and it goes into depth about retro/anterograde transport, but the FA talks more about supporting cells so i say to myself, okay ill just extract any more info i think is important about supporting cells, so i use the FA as a guide. I hope i have explained my question properly and clearly.
Thank you for your help.