- Joined
- Dec 12, 2006
- Messages
- 3,006
- Reaction score
- 3,508
Hello everyone. I was thinking today while reviewing insurance denials and limitations of care how much the insurance system is controlling how we practice. Even if not directly by authorizations and denials, they even control us by how our notes are designed, what type of EMR we use, the fact we even use an EMR, and the multitude of other policies we must enforce if we accept Medicare, etc.
My question is this: what would you do different if you were 100% cash-based?
Would you even do MBB before RF? Would you do MBB then burn if they got relief while on the table? Would you just do intraarticular facets? How many facet levels would you try to do at once? Would you do multiple regions such as C-spine, L-spine, SI joints at once? Would you do ESI the same day as a facet procedure? Would you do a bunch of stuff we don't do anymore such as epidurolysis, IDET, etc? Would you even use steroids and instead just use prolo, PRP, pitcher plant extract, whatever? Would you target surrounding structures with prolo/PRP when doing a joint injection to help stabilize the joint as well?
How would you change your practice?
My question is this: what would you do different if you were 100% cash-based?
Would you even do MBB before RF? Would you do MBB then burn if they got relief while on the table? Would you just do intraarticular facets? How many facet levels would you try to do at once? Would you do multiple regions such as C-spine, L-spine, SI joints at once? Would you do ESI the same day as a facet procedure? Would you do a bunch of stuff we don't do anymore such as epidurolysis, IDET, etc? Would you even use steroids and instead just use prolo, PRP, pitcher plant extract, whatever? Would you target surrounding structures with prolo/PRP when doing a joint injection to help stabilize the joint as well?
How would you change your practice?