How would you guys explain this?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

yummytummy

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2009
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I got an interview at VCU school of medicine and my verbal score is sub 7 🙁 Has anyone had to explain that in an interview and what did you guys say. I know that if I tell the truth (got distracted), they may tell me that a doctor should not get distracted. I know I gotta blame myself and cant blame the test itself, so what is an acceptable answer for you guys?
 
Just own up that Verbal isn't your strongest subject? Saying you got distracted just sounds like a bad excuse imo.
 
Not uncommon for premeds to struggle with VR, so just say it has not been your strongest subject. Also, you may want to consider synthesizing some extra filler to say how you have been continuing to work improving overall VR skills by reading books or something like that. They usually want to see that you are still working to improve those weaknesses in some way.
 
Actually I had to explain my writing score. Most ppl think that med school doesnt care about the writing score. But i've been on two interviews already and both interviewers asked why i did so poorly on the writing section. I just said, that i write better when i have more time to think of a response rather than rushing some thoughts together in a short amount of time. They didnt question me any further. But i agree with RevMD just tell them it's not ur strongest section but that you tried to prepare for it by doing x, y, z. you'll be fine.
 
"I don't talk good."

Answer honestly. They're not going to like any answer you have, more than likely. Be prepared to defend it. Don't come off weak, don't make excuses.
 
Explosive diarrhea
 
"**** happens (feel free to replace this with "Things happen that you don't expect"). I feel like it's not a good representation of what I'm capable of. I can't change anything now, but it's definitely something I plan on improving."
 
i like the idea of telling them that you have responded the low score by working on your verbal reasoning skills ever since. even if it isn't true, it would show dedication to self-improvement and an ability to overcome getting discouraged. they obviously saw your score before deciding to interview you, so I don't think it's too bad.
 
"**** happens (feel free to replace this with "Things happen that you don't expect"). I feel like it's not a good representation of what I'm capable of. I can't change anything now, but it's definitely something I plan on improving."
The question they'll ask if why HAVEN'T you improve it? you should have rescheduled and retaken that exam as soon as you saw the low verbal score.
 
The question they'll ask if why HAVEN'T you improve it? you should have rescheduled and retaken that exam as soon as you saw the low verbal score.

that's debatable. this is an especially low score, but it's also arguably the least important part of the MCAT. if they granted you an interview, it's an indication that they aren't that interested in the verbal section. i doubt it would be any more than one passing question.

that being said, if you retook and and scored better (while maintaining your previous scores in the other sections), you'd have a better shot at other schools.
 
The question they'll ask if why HAVEN'T you improve it? you should have rescheduled and retaken that exam as soon as you saw the low verbal score.

Maybe the OP took the test in September, didn't get scores back till Oct, decided to take a chance and apply anyway, possibly along with DO schools. I don't know the exact details, but the he/she should definitely tell the truth, which seems like the sub 7 score wasn't typical. The "plan on improving" part was in reference to working on critical reading and performing better under stress in general.
 
that's debatable. this is an especially low score, but it's also arguably the least important part of the MCAT. if they granted you an interview, it's an indication that they aren't that interested in the verbal section. i doubt it would be any more than one passing question.

that being said, if you retook and and scored better (while maintaining your previous scores in the other sections), you'd have a better shot at other schools.
I would definitely say it's "arguable," since some studies suggest that VR is THE most relevant section on the MCAT in relation to Step 1 performance.

Regardless, the applicant and the interviewer both know that this VR score is a huge glaring weakness in this person's application. The interviewer may well be interested in knowing why the applicant felt they didn't need to retake the exam with such a horrible score when the majority of other applicants will have done better.
 
Maybe the OP took the test in September, didn't get scores back till Oct, decided to take a chance and apply anyway, possibly along with DO schools. I don't know the exact details, but the he/she should definitely tell the truth, which seems like the sub 7 score wasn't typical. The "plan on improving" part was in reference to working on critical reading and performing better under stress in general.
You make a good point, that may be the case.

Either way, I think the OP better come up with something good and still expect to take a major hit. Getting distracted during the most important exam of your life up to this point does not impress admissions committees. If the MCAT can't keep your attention for 5 hours, how will your studies keep your attention for hours per day x 2 years?

I'm not here to make it sound like the OP has no chance of being successful, I'm just pointing out what adcoms may think about when interviewing him/her and when they discuss his/her file. These things should be taken into consideration when deciding how best to approach the question.
 
OP, be ready, of course, to explain the unusually low score, but also be positive during the rest of your interview experience. They obviously saw something they liked about your application and invited you for an interview to get to know you better. It's your time to shine and show them that there's more to you than part of an MCAT score. Good luck! :luck:
 
You make a good point, that may be the case.

Either way, I think the OP better come up with something good and still expect to take a major hit. Getting distracted during the most important exam of your life up to this point does not impress admissions committees. If the MCAT can't keep your attention for 5 hours, how will your studies keep your attention for hours per day x 2 years?

I'm not here to make it sound like the OP has no chance of being successful, I'm just pointing out what adcoms may think about when interviewing him/her and when they discuss his/her file. These things should be taken into consideration when deciding how best to approach the question.

You're absolutely correct. I'm not sure what got into me and why I didnt retake it. It could have been because I was tired of studying and I wanted to have a vacation. I took the MCAT in July and got it in August. I was signed up for another MCAT in early September, but I went to Cedar Point on the MCAT day...talk about responsibility...I'm not really sure what to tell them...but I gotta come up with something good b/c they are the only school that send me an interview this year 🙁

Edit: I believe I found a solution...should I say that humanities is my weakness and many passages were based from that and now I am improving on the humanities by reading x, y and z?
 
You're absolutely correct. I'm not sure what got into me and why I didnt retake it. It could have been because I was tired of studying and I wanted to have a vacation. I took the MCAT in July and got it in August. I was signed up for another MCAT in early September, but I went to Cedar Point on the MCAT day...talk about responsibility...I'm not really sure what to tell them...but I gotta come up with something good b/c they are the only school that send me an interview this year 🙁

Edit: I believe I found a solution...should I say that humanities is my weakness and many passages were based from that and now I am improving on the humanities by reading x, y and z?

I have an unbalanced MCAT with PS being my lowest/weakest point. I was only asked about it like twice and each time I was perfectly honest in my answer ( I hadn't taken physics prior to studying for the exam = stupid) BUT I also made sure they knew that I had gotten As in physics once I took it. Just make sure they know you're improved or that your performance doesn't necessarily reflect your actual skills and you'll be fine. They probably won't dwell on it. Mine never did. good luck on your interview! 🙂
 
I have multiple acceptances with a 6V. To tell you the truth, it only came up during one interview. For the most part, the school believes you are qualified if they invite you to interview. I was honest with my interviewer. I simply said that I only took the MCAT after consistently scoring in the low 30s on practice exams. The real test section is 40 questions, one bad verbal passage can seriously diminish your score. I applied with my score knowing that it was below what most schools were looking for in an applicant; however, I believed my ECs and graded coursework proved my dedication to medicine. I am convinced if you are able to hold an intelligent conversation with your interviewers your scores become irrelevant. I say this with 5 acceptances out of 6 interviews.

Good luck! You got the interview, now just be confident enough to show the ADCOMs you belong in their program.
 
I have multiple acceptances with a 6V. To tell you the truth, it only came up during one interview. For the most part, the school believes you are qualified if they invite you to interview. I was honest with my interviewer. I simply said that I only took the MCAT after consistently scoring in the low 30s on practice exams. The real test section is 40 questions, one bad verbal passage can seriously diminish your score. I applied with my score knowing that it was below what most schools were looking for in an applicant; however, I believed my ECs and graded coursework proved my dedication to medicine. I am convinced if you are able to hold an intelligent conversation with your interviewers your scores become irrelevant. I say this with 5 acceptances out of 6 interviews.

Good luck! You got the interview, now just be confident enough to show the ADCOMs you belong in their program.

Wow thanks for the advice! I'm afraid to do a couple of things. One thing I dont want to do is to blame the MCAT though (telling them that there are only 40 questions, although that is true). The second thing is that I dont want to sound like I'm making up excuses or tell the ADCOMs that I should have retaken it. If I said that English is not my native language (although on my AMCAS I said that it is my primary language) would that work?
 
I would definitely say it's "arguable," since some studies suggest that VR is THE most relevant section on the MCAT in relation to Step 1 performance.

not so sure about this my VR score was an 8 and my step I was >260
 
Wow thanks for the advice! I'm afraid to do a couple of things. One thing I dont want to do is to blame the MCAT though (telling them that there are only 40 questions, although that is true). The second thing is that I dont want to sound like I'm making up excuses or tell the ADCOMs that I should have retaken it. If I said that English is not my native language (although on my AMCAS I said that it is my primary language) would that work?

You are absolutely right, don't blame the MCAT. The truth is I would try best not to put forth ANY excuse, even 'english isn't my first language'. IMO, the best thing you can do is say that you prepared as well as you could for the test and be confident in your answers. I really think if they ask you anything about your MCAT it will be to see what type of reaction they can get out of you. Take all the wind out of their sails by acknowledging your shortcomings and direct them toward your writing sample score or any good grades you have received in English/Rhetoric/Writing coursework you have received.

They think you are worth an interview which means they are interested in you. In the end, as long as you avoid the jaw dropping, dear in the headlights look when they ask you about your verbal score, and you have a solid response you should be fine.

I would also explore the school specific thread to see if the interview is open or closed file to see if your interviewers will even have that information.

Sell yourself with the inevitable why medicine/why this program/tell me about yourself questions they are bound to ask and you should be fine!

Just to reiterate, my response included all of these bullets:
It was that my goal was to achieve a 10 in each subsection.
I practiced until I was able to reach this goal consistently on practice examinations.
I scheduled my test date at an opportune time.
Although I was upset with my ultimate score, I did maintain a 10 in both of the science sections and I had a solid writing score.
I have received an A in all liberal arts and writing intensive coursework (at the time of my interviews).

I forgot, an interviewer asked me shortly after why I thought I would make a good doctor. Basically, I spoke of my ECs and the fact that being a doctor extends beyond the MCAT score. At any rate, they must have thought it was a good enough answer.

Sorry for the rambling, good luck!
 
not so sure about this my VR score was an 8 and my step I was >260

This is a good point, I personally hate statistics when people try to force them on an individual. To the OP show them you think there is more to your application and yourself than merely a data point. Clearly people can do well in medical school with a 'sub par' MCAT score.
 
This is a good point, I personally hate statistics when people try to force them on an individual. To the OP show them you think there is more to your application and yourself than merely a data point. Clearly people can do well in medical school with a 'sub par' MCAT score.
The point isn't if you can do well -- the point is if the school should risk you doing well when they can risk someone who scored 3+ points better than you.

It's all about the competition for that spot and who they should give it to.
 
The point isn't if you can do well -- the point is if the school should risk you doing well when they can risk someone who scored 3+ points better than you.

It's all about the competition for that spot and who they should give it to.

That is absolutely right, I know why they use statistics. But, since schools risk some seats on students with scores similar to the OP, I just believe it is beneficial to walk into an interview with this understanding, and the belief that he/she could be the 'exception' to the 'rule'
 
That is absolutely right, I know why they use statistics. But, since schools risk some seats on students with scores similar to the OP, I just believe it is beneficial to walk into an interview with this understanding, and the belief that he/she could be the 'exception' to the 'rule'
Absolutely. I'll repeat again that I am not saying the OP has no chance, but that they need to think very carefully about how they approach the situation.

You've been giving very good advice.
 
Top