how's the angle ranking on the DAT?

[whoaaitzkyle]

---

Members do not see this ad.

Is it true that angles are within a 5 degree difference of each other or is it less of a difference?

 

[Toothguy80]

Yes, whoever made the angle ranking on the real DAT was psychotic and insane and wanted to fry our eyes so we would be drianed going into RC and QR,

Im just going to hope I do well on PAT because BIO, chem and Math, I know I'll do well...

 

[IsRaEl21]

in my opinion I think you should practice from Achiever they have a very similar level of difficulties for the angle ranking.

 

[xtractime]

yes the angles are ridiculous. to me, 3 of the 4 all looked the same. have fun guessing on that part of PAT.

 

[5th Molar]

HARD, HARD, HARD!!!!!!!! They love putting us through our paces. I spent more time studying for all the other sections of the PAT, and forgot about this one.

 

[DrSmiles12]

I thought the angle ranking on the real dat was tons easier. It was cake....

 

[Saber tooth]

Best way to attack is prosses of elimination... and guess when required ... remember no points are taken away for a wrong answer!!! and if when your practicing you still cannot get the hang of it, simply make sure to leave the section for the end... (sucks I know but what can we do.😎)

 

[dantheman2007]

are the lines on the DAT all straight, because Acheiver's lines on the cubes and angles were not straight.
Anyone know what I am talking about?

 

[JamieMac]

If you can do the achiever PAT and score in the upper teens, you will be totally fine on the DAT. I found the Achiever PAT to be harder in every section with the exception of the angle ranking (which was about the same). I was scoring between 18-19 on achiever and got a 24 on the DAT (finished the section with 9 minutes to spare). Kaplan is WAY easier than the real thing, and not the best preparation for it. Good luck.

Oh and yes I know what you mean by the lines not being straight on Achiever. The DAT is NOT like that. It is much more visually friendly.