Your way of thinking is why this is a touchy subject for me. If it si OK for a person to break a contract, then what is the use of a contact. A contact is a BINDING agree between two entities. For employment purposes, one side says I promise I will give you a job. The other side I promise I will faithfully work for you for 'X' amount of time. You use to be able trust a person that he/she would stand by their agreement. You never questioned it. You are sayig there is nothing wrong per say. So you basically agree that sports players have the right to back out of their agreement in order to seek more money for the same timeframe that they would have been paid less. this is a common thing today. Someone signs a contract for x millions for 5 years, but they have one or two great years and want XXX millions or they want traded or won't play even though they are still under contract for one or more seasons. Is that right? NO! Do you think the owners can say, hey, I know we have a contract, but you haved played like crap since we signed the contract. I want to sign a new contract where you are going to be paid 1/3rd or what you would have made because you are not performing as expected. Would that ever be allowed? HELL NO!!!!!! There is nothing right with breaking a contract. That is why there are allway certain stipulations placed in a contract to prevent others from breaking a contract or there are laws that bind up to the contracts. Your train of thought is just one of the many examples of how the US has been going down hill. I love the US, but I hate the road it is traveling!