hyperbaric treatment

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

sweetfoi

New Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2008
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
hello everyone 🙂 i just started to read about the (HBO) hyperbaric oxygen treatment and how its a prevention and treatment measure for Osteoradionecrosis . does anyone know if it has some effects on the adhesive or the bond strength
 
Last edited:
I thought it was proven that HBO tx wasn't quite as effective at preventing ORNJ as once thought?
The data is still pretty equivocal, and to my knowledge nothing has been proven. The only published data that I'm aware of is Marx's case series, which, while interesting, isn't exactly overpowering in terms of evidence-based practice.

I don't know what exactly the OP is talking about (adhesive as in composite resins, or adhesive as in denture paste?), but I can't even imagine a mechanism by which it would affect dental composites at all.
 
A quick Pubmed turns up:

Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Apr;37(4):404.

[SIZE=+1]The influence of hyperbaric oxygen on the outcome of patients treated for osteoradionecrosis: 8 year study.[/SIZE]

D'Souza J, Goru J, Goru S, Brown J, Vaughan ED, Rogers SN.

Regional Maxillofacial Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, L97AL, UK. [email protected]

This study was a retrospective review of treatment outcomes of osteoradionecrosis (ORN) of the mandible over an 8-year period, with specific reference to the role of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT). The presentation and management of 23 patients treated for ORN was studied by categorising them into three grades according to the severity of clinical and radiographic involvement. At presentation there were 13 patients with grade I ORN, six patients with grade II ORN and four patients with grade III ORN. HBOT was given to 10 patients in the grade I group, four patients in the grade II group and two patients in the grade III group. Overall eight patients (62%) with grade I, three patients (50%) with grade II and two patients (50%) with grade III were cured. In the patients who received HBOT the cure rate was 12.5% whilst in those without HBOT it was 86%. Although the cohort was small it seems that HBOT was of little benefit. HBOT is demanding for patients and has cost implications for the NHS; hence further clinical outcome data are urgently required with regard to its role in the management of ORN.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008 Oct;34(10):1123-34. Epub 2008 May 5.

[SIZE=+1]Management of osteoradionecrosis of the jaws: an analysis of evidence.[/SIZE]

Pitak-Arnnop P, Sader R, Dhanuthai K, Masaratana P, Bertolus C, Chaine A, Bertrand JC, Hemprich A.

Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, University Paris 6, Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France. [email protected]

AIM: To review and discuss the management of jaw bone osteoradionecrosis (JORN) based on levels of evidence. METHODS: The Medline/PUBMED and Cochrane search was performed to identify all studies on the management of JORN, published in English, French, and German during January 1975-October 2007. Only clinical researches were identified and classified into four levels of evidence before being examined. All references of the retrieved articles were analysed. FINDINGS: Seventy three articles and their additional 45 citations were evaluated. Most of the eligible literature provided observational evidence. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is an adjunct; however, its clinical usefulness remains controversial. A conservative approach should be limited to early-onset JORN, while radical surgery is indicated for an advanced or refractory lesion. Free tissue transfer is the reconstruction of choice for large defects without the need of HBOT. Some new technologies have also been studied, including ultrasound, biological molecules, distraction osteogenesis and antioxidant agents. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the reports on the treatment of JORN offer weak evidence. Current information seems insufficient for establishing the definite treatment guideline; thus, well-designed studies with long-term clinical data are encouraged.
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Dec 15;22(24):4893-900. Epub 2004 Nov 1.

[SIZE=+1]Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for radionecrosis of the jaw: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial from the ORN96 study group.[/SIZE]

Annane D, Depondt J, Aubert P, Villart M, Géhanno P, Gajdos P, Chevret S.

Service de Réanimation Médicale-Hôpital Raymond Poincaré (AP-HP), Université de Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines, 104 Boulevard Raymond Poincaré, 92380 Garches, France. [email protected]

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO) for overt mandibular osteoradionecrosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at 12 university hospitals. Ambulatory adults with overt osteoradionecrosis of the mandible were assigned to receive 30 HBO exposures preoperatively at 2.4 absolute atmosphere for 90 minutes or a placebo, and 10 additional HBO dives postoperatively or a placebo. The main outcome measure was 1-year recovery rate from osteoradionecrosis. Secondary end points included time to treatment failure, time to pain relief, 1-year mortality rate, and treatment safety. RESULTS: At the time of the second interim analysis, based on the triangular test, the study was stopped for potentially worse outcomes in the HBO arm. A total of 68 patients were enrolled and analyzed. At 1 year, six (19%) of 31 patients had recovered in the HBO arm and 12 (32%) of 37 in the placebo arm (relative risk = 0.60; 95% CI, 0.25 to 1.41; P = .23). Time to treatment failure (hazard ratio = 1.33; 95% CI, 0.68 to 2.60; P = .41) and time to pain relief (hazard ratio = 1.00; 95% CI, 0.52 to 1.89; P = .99) were similar between the two treatment arms. CONCLUSION: Patients with overt mandibular osteoradionecrosis did not benefit from hyperbaric oxygenation.
 
... does anyone know if it has some effects on the adhesive or the bond strength


Of what? Where?

Care to clarify or are you going to leave us hanging? 😡
 
Thank you aphistis that was really beneficial. one of the doctors told me that there is new reserch about how increasing the oxygen will effect the bond strength to enamel or dentine it either will increase or decrease it.also its effect according to the adhesive type
aceton based adhesive
water based adhesive
phenol based adhesive
 
I think what the OP is alluding to is that HBO might increase oxygen in the tissues including teeth. Oxygen interferes with resin polymerization. If the enamel or dentin had increased oxygen in it, then theoretically the bond strength would decrease.

I've never heard of a study on it, but it could be possible. I doubt that increased oxygen dissolved in your oral hard tissues lasts more than a few days.

Maybe the OP should do a study on it.
 
Top