I was doing some research on job opportunities throughout the nation specifically for anesthesia jobs and came across many lucrative offers in great urban locations (I'm not talking about farm country in the middle of nowhere). Recently, I constantly read and hear medical students/residents complain about future "bad" pay and the debts they have accumulated throughout the years of schooling, etc. However, there seems to be a plenty of great jobs opportunities out there where they offer huge (five to six figure) bonuses, school debt repayment (up to 50k a year!), plus the usual start salary of about 300k for anesthesiologist. Am I missing something here?
A few for now:
-you are not really the boss (so no or little respect), and often you're considered expendable by the higher-ups.
-you have little control over your schedule in that some days you can be done by 3pm while other days you might not be done till 3am because a case took longer than expected. this can get old for some people, sort of like how it's fun to travel on business but when you have a family it's not so fun anymore. if a surgeon wants to add on a case near the end of the day, you can't just easily reschedule for another time, like you could if you're in a patient-facing specialty and a patient arrives late to see you. no, you just have to do the case. also the surgeon can often schedule cases on days or times convenient to him or her, which may or may not be convenient to you.
-you cannot directly control payer mix, which in turn influences how much you can or cannot make, unlike say a PP ophthalmologist or dermatologist who simply refuses to accept mostly Medicare patients.
-it can be physically demanding (e.g. OR toil), which is harder to recover from with age.
-all other things equal, career longevity is probably more likely in a specialty like pathology, radiology, heme/oncology, etc. than anesthesiology. not as much wear and tear in general, more thinking than doing. of course this is by no means a hard and fast rule, there are many exceptions. like someone could die of boredom in a specialty they hate even if it's "easier" on the body or lifestyle or whatever, but work forever in one they love even though it's got a harder lifestyle etc. however, if you're on the fence about two specialties then career longevity might be worth taking into consideration.
-since it's quite procedural and lacks patients, if you get injured like breaking an arm then it's harder to do your job, unlike other physicians like cards or GI or even some surgeons who can at least still see some patients or prescribe drugs or schedule future surgeries or dictate some orders or otherwise rely on non procedural means to keep the income somewhat flowing until they recover and can operate again.
-you may still need to take the most onerous form of call for most your entire career - e.g. coming into the hospital to do cases in the middle of the night.
-acute care is fun when you're a med student or resident, but when you're the attending with the brunt of the legal liability it could be quite a different story.
-big mistakes in the OR can happen in seconds or minutes. some thrive on this, others not so much. know thyself.
-the ACT is here to stay so most likely you should expect to do less of your own cases and more managing CRNAs.
-is the PSH the future?
-most CRNAs are chill but the militant ones are anything but, and as a result spoil so much including patient care and safety without necessarily realizing it.
-anesthesiologists seem to be significantly losing their current share of the market to AMCs and CRNAs, though an optimist can hope the trend stalls or even reverses. how likely this is is up for debate.
-no patients is both a blessing and a curse, but the curse is hospitals and others don't give you the time of day and you may have limited decision-making abilities with them since you're not actively bringing in patients and thus money to the hospital. but this can be ameliorated in some ways like if you do a fellowship in pain and work partly in pain or serve on a hospital committee and are politically savvy enough to garner influence and support, etc.
-note I didnt mention anything about salary, not that it shouldn't be a consideration, but because it shouldn't be the sole or even primary consideration. for many people you couldn't pay them enough to do a job they hate or don't feel like they're contributing to or making a difference in or are proud of or the like. or at least many people would be willing to trade money for other things like time or respect etc. know yourself, your goals and priorities in life, investigate the good and bad of specialties you're interested in, not just the medical science but also other concerns including the bread and butter cases, the patient population, the available practice environment options, the personality or culture of the physicians of each specialty. just my two cents'.
(There are positives too, of course, but since you asked what you might be "missing"...)