- Joined
- Feb 22, 2006
- Messages
- 1,261
- Reaction score
- 4
Before we get carried away, are we sure she's a chick? I read it as if luft was more on the dude end of the spectrum.
See, I thought so too, hence the ? after topless shehulk.Psyclops said:Before we get carried away, are we sure she's a chick? I read it as if luft was more on the dude end of the spectrum.
Poety said:Ok, I'm on the anesthesiology forum, and those guys are making 450K a year. WHy aren't we making that kind of money, and HOW are they making that kind of moneY? I WANT THAT KIND OF MONEY!
ideas?
Faebinder said:Psychiatry should be looking into developing and doing more procedures that will boost income.
I am not sure how much does doing ECT earn the psychiatrist.. but that is one procedure I would think that helps.
e.g. Something like direct insertion of psychotropic or mood stabilizer medications into the CSF through an ultrasound guided needle to substitute pill taking for a month.
I'm not an expert of course but that's what I see is needed to boost the psychiatry ability to bill.
PublicHealth said:And how are the impoverished on Medicaid (read: bulk of psych patients) going to pay for these procedures? Psychiatric patients are not flocking to ECT clinics with checkbooks in hand.
Faebinder said:Psychiatry should be looking into developing and doing more procedures that will boost income.
I am not sure how much does doing ECT earn the psychiatrist.. but that is one procedure I would think that helps.
e.g. Something like direct insertion of psychotropic or mood stabilizer medications into the CSF through an ultrasound guided needle to substitute pill taking for a month.
I'm not an expert of course but that's what I see is needed to boost the psychiatry ability to bill.
Psyclops said:Yeah, that's right, lets set up treatment guidelines based on how expensive they are. We should gear R & D around what would be the most cost ineffective delivery system. We can then delight in how our insurance premiums rise!
Congratulations, you have just shared a horrible idea. But, looking on the bright side, it sounds like you have the ethical makeup for a career in a large pharmaceutical company or as Dick Cheney's chief of staff. I hear Enron is looking for a new CEO.
Anasazi23 said:You answered your own questions.
Medicaid reimburses more for procedures. Medicare more.
Solideliquid said:Chillax 2mg Tabs
Take one by mouth twice a day
#60 (sixty) no refills
Medicaid is even worse...something like $20 per session.PublicHealth said:Right. But it's not much: http://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-12-01-00450.pdf
Poety said:Ok, I'm on the anesthesiology forum, and those guys are making 450K a year. WHy aren't we making that kind of money, and HOW are they making that kind of moneY? I WANT THAT KIND OF MONEY!
ideas?
Anasazi23 said:Medicaid is even worse...something like $20 per session.
ECT doesn't pay for some reason. Even the anesthesiologists don't get paid much for the procedures. At least that's what what one told me.
whopper said:If you want to make money, there are of course options outside of practice. You could set up your own businesses outside of psychiatry. I was planning on doing that, while using the attending salary as a means of capital to finance the future empire.
Remember, specialist positions will make you more money--but salaries peak. The further you specialize the more trapped you become in terms of your marketability. Read the book Rich Dad Poor Dad. If you want to make a comfortable salary, being a doctor is fine, but if you really want to be rich, a doctor's salary will rarely if ever break out beyond a few hundred thousand a year, it'll almost never reach a million or more. To do that you have to start doing things outside of medicine.
Also, you have to enjoy what you're doing. I'd rather take a $150,000 job I'd love than a $200,000 job I'd hate.
Psyclops said:You better get that order IM, because I refuse.
Well, it entirely depends. Removing a gallbladder from a Medicaid patient still pays a significant sum, albeit less than private insurance. You can't predict the Medicaid/Medicare cost of a code or procedure until it's in use (for the most part). It may be possible that TMS, for example, would pay significantly more than ECT.PublicHealth said:My argument stands. Hypothetically, if psychiatrists started doing all kinds of fancy procedures in attempt to boost their income, they would have to seek out fee-for-service private patients, probably in affluent areas of the country. The majority of psychiatric patients would not be able to afford such procedures, or their government insurance would not cover it. Derm is where it's at if one wants to suck money.
No, it's more like, "And don't give me no generic Klonopin doc, my insurance pays for the good stuff."Psyclops said:Insurance? I have Medicaid Insurance.
Anasazi23 said:Or, if we get approval to treat resistant depression with botox, that may have billable codes akin to pain management injections.
PublicHealth said:That study was published in a sh*tty journal with an n < 10.
Anasazi23 said:It's called a pilot study.
The journal's impact factor is similar to other dermatology journals (2.254)
PublicHealth said:Right. But psychiatry is FAR away from incorporating botox into everyday practice. Moreover, insurance will likely not cover it, and pharma will fight it every step of the way. Botox = $$$.
Anasazi23 said:Baby steps.
Psyclops said:I'm in in about 6 years, slug. I assume we could be running some researhc projects as well?