- Joined
- Apr 18, 2015
- Messages
- 817
- Reaction score
- 696
Much is written here about the importance of demonstrating altruism. Given an applicant pool filled with extremely high achieving individuals with generally large ambitions, and given that one can imagine a large percentage of candidates possess at least, for lack of better words, a "healthy" dose of narcissism, how do (or do they?) adcoms suss out whether candidates have the kind of narcissism that most don't want to see in their physicians? And are there cases where some of those who have racked up impressive displays of apparent altruism on paper are also on the more malignant end of the narcissism scale? And doesn't the focus (obsession?) on accumulating certain numbers of hours in certain categories unwittingly contribute to potential confusion in sussing out what is real altruism vs narcissism vs even just very self-interested efforts to get oneself into medical school? Does the demand for candidates to meet and exceed certain profiles (and fulfill the category areas considered essential for being a competitive candidate) unwittingly contribute to candidates being less like what adcoms say they want...in other words, less genuine, less creative, less spontaneous, less "real"?