- Joined
- Sep 9, 2004
- Messages
- 7,132
- Reaction score
- 1,250
Raper alleges in the suit that Planned Parenthood and Bryant were negligent for failing to end her pregnancy and that Eleonu was negligent for failing to see she was still pregnant.
The state's high court ruled in 1990 that parents can sue physicians for child-rearing expenses, but limited those claims to cases in which children require extraordinary expenses because of medical problems, medical malpractice lawyer Andrew C. Meyer Jr. said.
Raper's suit has no mentions of medical problems involving her now 2-year-old daughter.
As with all medical malpractice suits in Massachusetts, Raper's complaint will have to be screened by a tribunal consisting of a Superior Court judge, a lawyer, and a doctor to determine whether it has merit to go to trial.
Crazy her attorney didnt inform of her obligation to MITIGATE DAMAGES under US Common Law meaning it is her obligation to put the child up for an adoption or state care before the so-called child rearing costs are incurred.
Why is this even news? And why isnt her attorney being disbarred??