- Joined
- May 19, 2015
- Messages
- 228
- Reaction score
- 7
I know some people are unhappy as PA's and nurses. So if u had to do it over would you? And what would u do?
Last edited:
Well, if I went back in time I most definitely would still become an RT, only difference is I would have picked a better school and started on my Bachelors earlier.
Oh, and I would have have emigrated to Canada ASAP as soon I had the experience and the money to instead of dicking around with being an RT in the states. Canadian RT's have such a larger scope of practice and more autonomy than we do. Not to mention the advancement opportunities, as both Anesthesia Assistants and Cardiopulmonary Perfusionists are primarily RT's. Oh, if only...
Really? What are they allowed to do in Canada?
Last I read Healthcare professionals aside from MD's had a more narrow scope of practice up there and that they don't even have PA's or APRN's up there
Turf battles are hilarious. We had to fight for the right to do PPDs, something nurses felt was a bother to begin with but didn't want to give up. Wtf, why?There are indeed both NP's and PA's in Canada actually. They're not as big as in the States, but they definitely exist.
As for RT's, the scope encompasses much more. Just off the top of my head RT's up there: Intubate, manage IABP's and ECMO, insert A-lines and CVC's (peripheral IV sometimes too, but much less often), are much more protocol driven, and can bill for services out of the hospital (this is a big one, American RT's can't). As for advancement, first and foremost there are no CRNA's in Canada. In their place is the Anesthesia Assistant (similar-ish to American AA's, although not the same), which is an advanced RT specialization. Similar for Cariopulmonary Perfusionist, which is open to both RT and RN, but seems to be more RT heavy than RN.
Compare this to the US where AA's are rare and CRNA's dominate, so RT's have little opportunity to enter Anesthesia. CPP's are still an option, but not as much used anymore. With Respiratory Care still being stuck at the Associate's level with few Bachelors level options getting admission to the few remaining CPP programs can be challenging, requiring us to go back to school again to receive a second degree (often not even in respiratory) just to meet the minimum degree requirements.
Also in the US RT's can technically do all the things I mentioned for Canadian RT's, and we are definitely taught all those things in school, but in application we are rarely allowed to. The hospital which uses RT's for ECMO vs. RN's is rare. Even more so for IABP. Some hospitals let RT's insert A-lines, most don't. Same for PICC's and CVC's. Protocols are very hit or miss too. We in the US have a two front war as far as scope, it's either physicians who won't allow us to practice, typically because the majority of them don't know (or care) about the amount of education we actually have or what said education entails (which is funny, because the ACCP, ATS, and ASA control our field and RT only exists because of them. They also sit on the board of our organization and are responsible for creating our curriculum and approving all changes/advancements in professional practice). Or it's nurses (politically speaking) who keep us down so they can absorb these duties over us. In the end it basically can be summed up as: We are trained to do what Canadian RT's do, but only about 20% of us in this country are allowed to because of outside interference.
Personal example: In my current hospital I run my ventilators completely independently via protocol with the intensivists blessing. Unless it's a trauma surgery case, in which case the trauma surgeon demands full control. I have to get an order just to lower the FiO2 when he is in charge. I can insert A-lines, but we had to fight tooth and nail against the nurses - they didn't even want to do them, they just didn't want us to do them. Likewise I share responsibility with the RN's over Central Lines and PA catheters (monitoring/maintenance, not insertion), which again the nurses, not the doctors, fought us about. I am not allowed to touch and am discouraged from even caring about the IABP's. We have no protocol for medications, so I give a lot of not indicated breathing treatments (that Trauma Surgeon I mentioned? He orders Q6 ATC Albuterol/Atrovent on every single trauma surgical patient no matter their history until they discharge). Unless they're a COPD exacerbation, then I have full control again over ordering and altering their medications. I was allowed to intubate on the floors because the ED docs (of which there are 1-2 per shift) were tired of having to leave the ED to come intubate, but then they changed their minds and took over again. It's a big ass mess basically, but it's the life of an RT pretty much everywhere. I don't complain though, because when I worked at UCSF I was little more than a robot, following orders to the letter with absolutely no protocols and simply twiddling with knobs when told to.
Yeah, our profession is scattered and all over the place here in the US. I'm still deciding on whether I want to pursue PA school or emigrate to the great up north (with a lot of thinking/deciding yet to happen), but either choice will in the end be better than where I am now. Unless our political organizations get their **** together and there's a major culture change, but I won't really be holding my breath for that.
I know some people are unhappy as PA's and nurses. So if u had to do it over would you? And what would u do?
Turf battles are hilarious. We had to fight for the right to do PPDs, something nurses felt was a bother to begin with but didn't want to give up. Wtf, why?
I was able to acquire some great experience in my senior practicum because I worked in an ICU for a month. That hospital had very few RTs, and no phlebotomists or IV teams, so ICU nurses (and any other nurses that worked there) were basically responsible for all of those tasks. They were also the rapid response nurses, so I was able to acquire some experience with codes.
Turf battles are hilarious. We had to fight for the right to do PPDs, something nurses felt was a bother to begin with but didn't want to give up. Wtf, why?
Oh, and if you want to run ECMO as an RT, there are a few places where we do so. MGH comes to mind. It's not a bad career, but the inconsistency of practice hospital-to-hospital sort of makes it so, hence my getting out.
Oh, and the AA route exists stateside if you're looking to go RT>anesthesia, which I'm sure you know already, but it's very geographically limiting. Perfusion also seemed like a great idea at the surface, but the jobs just aren't there anymore.
What RT tasks did they have the nurses doing at that hospital?
One example would be vents. We had RTs, but because there were so few of them, day shift might see them once if they're lucky - usually at the beginning of shift. We were educated about, trained to, and allowed to, modify vent settings as needed. We basically only called RT if we couldn't figure it out ourselves or if we just wanted them to OK whatever we had to change/modify. 9 times out of 10 we wouldn't even do that. We would chart the change in settings and the RT that came around for the next shift or round would check it again.
When I switched over to the other hospital, RT did everything, everywhere, including in the ICU. Management didn't want nurses to even think about traches or vents. If there was a problem, protocol was to refer to RT.
Damn, that hospital sounds like it had some messed up priorities. It's awesome though that you got be around vents at least and get more comfortable with them (most RN's I encounter seem to get nervous at even the slightest vent problems). Even though as an RT I can get a bit defensive of my machine sometimes, there's nothing I love more than working with a solid ICU nurse I can bounce ideas off of when things start to go south.
Still personally makes me a bit nervous though when I hear about RN's being allowed to fiddle with vents. As an RT our program had required us to take physics (5 semester hours) plus two semester long vent classes in the program over eight months (totaling over 500 classroom hours, not including lab time) just to really learn about everything involved with ventilators. And even after that plus three years of working I feel there's an enormous amount of information to still learn about them.
sounds kinda depressing. I am thinking of PA, but don't really like the career ceiling that the profession has. Then I think of just getting stable income and then save up money to venture into other businesses. Does PA have a good work and life balance? The pa I work along with is always working, doing exact same thing as the doctor but getting paid a half less, but I know if you go into other specialties its apparently better.
Got a 395k 3700 sq ft home........
I did get this fixed loan for 5 years then variable that I intend to refinance in 3-4years. At 3.1 rate, 100%.
Emergency Physician. Get the full training for the field that I love so much. Oh....and 3-4X the pay.
Don't want to rain on your parade, but that's a dangerous loan. I hope you got a 15 year note so you can have some equity in 3-4 years. Otherwise you run the great risk of being in trouble when you have to refi. Interest rates have nowhere to go but up.
knowing back in the day what I know now I would have gone to medschool (DO) and done a dual FP/EM residency and worked in a rural environment after graduation from residency. The happiest docs I know are all rural primary care and em docs. I have several friends who are double boarded doing both, loving their schedules and their lives. plenty of time off. great salaries. no debt. I am slowly but surely working myself into a position doing mostly rural coverage shifts, both double coverage and solo coverage positions. I'm at around 50:50 now, some months 60:40 in favor of rural. when I can make the jump away from urban shifts entirely I plan to do so.
I am 35 and about to apply to MD/DO schools, but realized that it might not be the best idea at my age because of the debt considerations and my future abilities to pay it back. I read you quite often and think that your advice would be valuable for me on that matter. Anyone else, gentlemen, your opinions are as precious. Thank you.
As a current med student and licensed RT, I can back that RTs know more about vents than even most physicians, with the exception being critical care and anesthesia trained docs (and those that take a special interest in vents). Even then, however, much of the basic art of vent management (such as equipment vs patient troubleshooting to locate the source of a problem) is unknown to them (except perhaps anesthesia). Like, I can tell you in ten seconds where volume loss in a system is coming from and fix it because I'm very familiar with the equipment. The idea of a nurse handling a complicated equipment problem (of which there are many) is pretty damn terrifying to me.Damn, that hospital sounds like it had some messed up priorities. It's awesome though that you got be around vents at least and get more comfortable with them (most RN's I encounter seem to get nervous at even the slightest vent problems). Even though as an RT I can get a bit defensive of my machine sometimes, there's nothing I love more than working with a solid ICU nurse I can bounce ideas off of when things start to go south.
Still personally makes me a bit nervous though when I hear about RN's being allowed to fiddle with vents. As an RT our program had required us to take physics (5 semester hours) plus two semester long vent classes in the program over eight months (totaling over 500 classroom hours, not including lab time) just to really learn about everything involved with ventilators. And even after that plus three years of working I feel there's an enormous amount of information to still learn about them.
The debt takes care of itself, don't worry about it. Even after debt and taxes, unless you're clearing a ton now and end up with low pay later, you'll be coming out ahead every month.I am 35 and about to apply to MD/DO schools, but realized that it might not be the best idea at my age because of the debt considerations and my future abilities to pay it back. I read you quite often and think that your advice would be valuable for me on that matter. Anyone else, gentlemen, your opinions are as precious. Thank you.