drgregory said:
good post. i have a goal to try to teach prospective ODs that commercial optometry is very seldom helpful to the field of optometry. KHE is a realist who brings forth valuable insight on how the ancient, spectacle peddling, private OD who does little in the way of primary eye care is also killing optometry. my hopes (and i think KHE's), is that our opinions of optometry are at least noted and stored in the back of optometry students' minds to be used upon making the decision to apply and if so, after graduation.
sorry to speak for you KHE, but i know who you are and you know who i am, and we both have strong (and IMO accurate) opinions of certain aspects of optometry.
Dr. Gregory and I agree on most things. I however do not vilify or condemn commercial practices or the doctors who practice in them nearly as much as he does.
I strongly agree with him that commercial practice does not portray the best image of the profession or our abilities. However, I contend that there are just as many "private practices" out there if NOT MORE that are really no better than the vast majority of commercial locations out there. As I have said before, can anyone really make the argument that a Lenscrafters in an upscale mall is as bad an image for the profession as a private office in between the pizzeria and the nail salon? I doubt it.
And unfortunately, thats what a lot of private practices out there are like.
I find a lot of contempt directed at commercial doctors by private docs is largely hypocritical because so many private doctors are living the proverbial glass house.
I do not know if Dr. Gregory falls in this category. I don't get the impression that he does, but I have never met him nor have I visited his office. While I agree with the spirit of most of the things he says, I think he sometimes goes too far in his attempts to portray commercial doctors as corporate sell outs who only care about instant gratification and who are slaves to their corporate masters while private practitioners are all fine upstanding altruisitic doctors who care only about the health and welfare of their patients.
My main concern is that optometry students and pre-optometry students have a bit of a distorted view of the profession and what it takes to have a rewarding career in it. Many students are excited about the prospect of "being a doctor." They think they will get paid good money to help people see better and HEY, what could be better than that right? They envision themselves being an owner of their own upscale private office filled with designer merchandise and a waiting room full of grateful patients who have all kinds of interesting ocular pathology and who are eager to buy your designer merchandise. They think that they will be well loved by their patients because they will impress them by doing all kinds of extra tests on them.
Since I only practice on a limited basis, it has afforded me the opportunity to take a step back and reflect on what I should have done differently and what students who are considering this as a field should be doing to ensure that they get themselves on the right path.
For the record, I don't think I have ever bad mouthed the profession of optometry per se. YOU CAN HAVE A REWARDING CAREER IN OPTOMETRY!!!!
However, to do that you have to do a lot of research about the areas in which you want to practice. And as I have said before, that research has very little to do with how many ODs or OMDs are in that area or what the scope of state licensure is in that state.