- Joined
- Mar 6, 2010
- Messages
- 871
- Reaction score
- 89
I am a person who is better at physical science than biological science. By looking at my grades, my most As are from chemistry and physics courses while I get B+ Bs from biology courses except genetics since it was all problem solving.
If I study physics and chemistry with BR then do BR passages I reach 12 to 13 or 14 to 15 range.
However, if I just study EK Bio and try BR passages, I am in 8 to 10 range except for the strongest areas like enzyme kinetics and biochem which was 12 to 13. If I try EK 1001 bio, I score 10 or sometimes 13, but this is because they are easier than BR.
For orgo, I think I forgot the most of the material since they were taken during my freshman year in 2007. I finished the first chapter with BR and scored 8 to 10 range.
I think I have a very weak foundation in biology and orgo, should I stick with BR for bio and orgo though they are too detailed? With just EK, I sometimes encounter questions that I have no idea about and no matter what they cannot be answered by just reading passages then using logic.
If I study physics and chemistry with BR then do BR passages I reach 12 to 13 or 14 to 15 range.
However, if I just study EK Bio and try BR passages, I am in 8 to 10 range except for the strongest areas like enzyme kinetics and biochem which was 12 to 13. If I try EK 1001 bio, I score 10 or sometimes 13, but this is because they are easier than BR.
For orgo, I think I forgot the most of the material since they were taken during my freshman year in 2007. I finished the first chapter with BR and scored 8 to 10 range.
I think I have a very weak foundation in biology and orgo, should I stick with BR for bio and orgo though they are too detailed? With just EK, I sometimes encounter questions that I have no idea about and no matter what they cannot be answered by just reading passages then using logic.
