Three posts on your account and they are all today and are about how you pay $35-45/hr. Is this PAtoPharm's alt trying to justify his recent change in tone?!
That actually sounds like a pretty decent job. 97k is a higher salary than most people will ever achieve, and it sounds like you have a great work environment. The extra OT is just icing on the cake. The difference between 100k/year and 120k/year is barely noticeable. The average person in America makes around 30-40k, maybe 50-60k if they have a good education. Pharmacists tend to forget that because we are always comparing ourselves to surgeons.
Gwarm01, let navrx go. Here's the deal. If you offer beneath what is widely known as the market rates for your area, that's ..."ok"... if there's something meaningful in the compensation package to offset it. I'll dox someone to make the argument.
This guy, Steve Simonson, has a bunch of pharmacies in the area that Garrison Keillor grew up in as a stereotypical Lake Wobegon Minnesotan community:
https://goodrichpharmacy.com/staff/steve-simenson
https://goodrichpharmacy.com/pharmacists.html
openly and without embarrassment says he pays below market rates compared with retail in MN. Steve, Willie, and Wendy's real well-known around the area for being an upstanding people who really run a small-town pharmacy, and the likelihood of a position coming open is really only when he opens a new location. I'm "advertising" for him in the same way that his reputation works in the area. Basically, everyone who is both UMP and Allina covered uses that pharmacy, and the pharmacists there get to do some ambulatory care as well as the normal dispensing. So, instead of working straight chain, you take less $ for an easier practice and maybe a more fulfilling one. Works so far. Chains don't have a problem with him and vice-versa as their clientele are completely different.
But, if you don't offer market rates and don't have any particular offset for that (even with improved customers), you just dug yourself a huge liability hole in the sense that one surly pharmacist can blow up a lot of business for an independent pharmacy. There's a Dworkin and Revco story for those who don't remember how that sort of screwjob works out.
I'd work exactly the same hours as him, but I pity the miserly attitude as he can't afford that in the normal situation. Again, I'll place good money that when the times get tough, even for a market like this where it is employer (not employee) advantageous, everyone has it in for an independent pharmacist that wants to out-CVS CVS.