That's exactly what you SHOULDN'T do....So please don't stop posting in the thread because you think it is restricted to pre-meds. If anything your input is more valuable than theirs given you have more experience in working with Ross students and grads.
I am feeling the warmth and love
😍
...The article also points out the need to question the legitimacy of these schools, since they receive so much federal funding.
I think this is the point that we need to consider and consider carefully. I appreciate the concept of redemption. But, let's really consider what we are dealing with, cause this "rehab program" is costing $150+million per year to produce, after 6 years, 60+% graduation rate of which only 20% can obtain a residency!!! We don't know what the residency completion rate is... I don't think any USA based med-school would last very long with around 40% fail rate/6yrs (70% fail to complete at 4yrs).... especially if you can reasonably predict a very high fail rate based on your candidate selection pool.
Before I proceed with my next line of very painful commentary, I again want to say I have worked with some very good Ross physicians.
Now, let's consider the backwards nature of what amounts to a "government"/"socialized" approach to medical education called Ross.... Everyone remember being graded on a "curve" in undergrad? Maybe you only got 75% actually right on your Organic Chem final. Yet, that 75% got you the B+/A- on the curve.... So, how about the Ross applicant who's GPA is at a "C"or "B-" level? What percent correct did they get on the Organic Chem final, 45-50%? This individual takes the MCAT and scores relatively at the bottom/left of the bell curve compared to US med-school applicants. All of these factors suggest a significantly less basic
"fund of knowledge" (for you interns and rotating med-students, remember those words) as they are actually ADVANCED to graduate school (aka medical school).
Now, you put all these remedial kids (less fund of knowledge) together in one massive program. I suspect Ross has some courses graded on a curve too (though I could be wrong). The top performer on a Ross curve is probably a generally low performer in the States. This is quite backwards isn't it? Think about it, folks go for freshman undergrad year at big state schools with 150+ students in large auditoriums. Numerous don't do well and.... go to community college, smaller classes, more personalized attention. In the Ross model.... backwards.
...The one thing that's been hammered into my head is the idea of "personal responsibility" when it comes to every stage of a Ross education...
I am all for "personal responsibility".... But, Ross stating that is like a crack dealer chastising the crack whoe for prostitution. They recruit from the desperate, undergrad pool, mostly composed of folks that have proved for several years an incapacity for independent/self directed/disciplined learning... Then, they say it's all about "personal responsibility" while collecting 100s of millions of dollars churning folks through class after class... Ross functioning under the "personal responsibility" mantra is their way of washing their hands of accountability.
Now, let me add some caveats.... I do know some folks that were very high scorers in undergrad, but for one reason or another could not land a US non-island MD/DO med-school and gambled for Ross. My experience is those are the exceptions. And again, should taxpayer dollars go towards this gamble and hope on the wind to fulfill your dream to be an MD? Think about it.... only around 60+% graduation rate even after 6 years and only 20% will get into residency... I think that $150+million could easily be put towards any number of new US based med-schools, US based medical school scholarships, etc.....
What's worse is that the only way to truely make Ross a magnet for ~"qualified" candidates would be to make it free... The current set-up can not be called recruitment so much as a swap meet sales market....
JAD