Years ago I sent in a manuscript for a review of metatarsal fractures, evalaution and management and was told that the Journal only solicites review articles from "experts". I am not an expert in the field of metatarsal fractures I guess.
Please PM me with a copy of the letter saying that. I have reviewed submitted papers and what you say is completely untrue. If you can prove this to me I will question it. But there are no such criteria. It's all about science, quality of the study, and format.
The ONLY criteria that ACFAS uses to even consider you as a lecturer at one of their meetings is if you have attended one of their multiple meetings a year. If you have not been to one of their meetings within the last five years, you can't even hope to be selected as a potential speaker.
Why doesn't that make sense to you? You haven't been to any function in 5 years, they may suspect that you do not know the current format. The tracks for example at the annual meeting are completely different in their format than 5 years ago.
I was also told by the Education Secretary(?) at ACFAS that even if I did come to the meeting, I have a slim chance of being selected as a speaker as they have such a full roster and they don't want to "step on anyone's toes".
There are many people who volunteer their time as speakers. But step on toes? Here is the funny part. Some still think this is an ego thing. Do you know what most seasoned speakers complain about when assigned topics for seminars. That they have too many. Most would be happy with a couple. We do not like to work extra anymore than you. Here's the twist it's the newbie who complains "I should/deserve to be giving more talks".
I lecture at 3-4 conferences a year and don't feel that after 6-7 years of being on the circuit, I need to spend more time away from my family and more money to go to a conference which even with all the BS, I would consider a privilege to lecture at. I gave up on it frankly, because I just don't get that mentality. Oh sorry, there is another way to get a lecture spot. To have a sponsor pay for it. But then it wouldn't be CME.
Sponsors never select speakers for the annual meeting. I have served on the annual committee and this would never be permitted. As far as your 3-4 conferences a year and being on the "circuit" that still doesn't mean you couldn't contribute on a committee. BTW after more than 20 years I consider it a privilege and honor anytime I am asked to lecture. I feel that there is emerging many differences in the way we look at things. Not better or worse but definitely different.
I support all of these institutions just like you do Podfather. What seems to be a little bit of difference in our experiences, is that I seem to find that they aren't perfect and also don't mind pointing it out. Just like you ask for change within the APMA with affiliates and loosening up their guidelines and bylaws, maybe other organziations should lead the way in that regard.
I agree with this. A funny thing is all of this exclusion talk, implied elitism, and good old boy conspiracies. I had no pull, knew no one. Yet with consistent hard work, demonstration of efficiency, willigness to start in the mailroom for experience, and passion I have been able to move up and give back. My involvement at leadership positions came without nepotism, pull, or butt kissing. I disprove everything that has been said relating to those issues.
I think eventually when the ASPS increases its membership and "clout", it will strive to excel as well.