Interview Questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter deleted109597
  • Start date Start date
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
I have another question for you that don't mind answering. How much does the whole application and interview process cost a person on average? I know it depends on the number of locations a person applies and interviews...just wanted an estimate if that is possible. Thanks!
 
The answer is, it depends. For a fair number of people on the east coast, you can drive to a great number of programs. So, it costs about two tanks of gas and a night at motel 6, multiplied times the number of places you go to. However, for other places, you have to fly, which makes it cost about 5 times more. I know some people spend around $5000, other spend less than $1000. So there it comes down to where you apply.

Of interest, the AMA will put their members up for free in a couple cities. Just in case anyone wanted to know. You have to contact the auxiliary.
 
I got one tough question - I was asked how does my faith impact the way I practice medicine.

Anyone know if the AOA will put us up for free in certain cities? That would be nice.
 
I got asked:

Are you married?
Do you have kids?
Do you plan on having kids during residency?

All three of those were by more than one interviewer at a program.

Another resident (not in a scheduled interview) asked me all of those AND "What religion are you?"

Haven't they ever heard of the illegal questions? I personally don't mind any of the first three, but when they're asked by more than half the interviewers, and then the religion thing gets tossed in... I'd rather get the dreaded "So, tell me about yourself."
 
I personally like "What is your biggest weakness?"

Ok, actually I hate it. Anyone have a good answer to that?
 
I personally like "What is your biggest weakness?"

Ok, actually I hate it. Anyone have a good answer to that?

Overachiever or pay too much attention to detail/have to complete things. Or, sometimes, "I get too into my job".

If you're dressed really, really well, you can make it a joke and say, "I'm a slob at home". However, don't allude to this also being a theme in The Story of O.
 
I got asked:

Are you married?
Do you have kids?
Do you plan on having kids during residency?

All three of those were by more than one interviewer at a program.

Another resident (not in a scheduled interview) asked me all of those AND "What religion are you?"

Haven't they ever heard of the illegal questions? I personally don't mind any of the first three, but when they're asked by more than half the interviewers, and then the religion thing gets tossed in... I'd rather get the dreaded "So, tell me about yourself."

😕 😕


How very inappropriate.
 
I personally like "What is your biggest weakness?"

Ok, actually I hate it. Anyone have a good answer to that?


I think the right way to answer this question is to point to an actual weakness, or something you have to work at. Don't dodge the question with things like "I'm a perfectionist" or "I'm a workaholic"--they don't really show any personal insight on your part. On the other hand don't tell us anything too scary i.e. the answer to your biggest weakness should not be your struggle with your heroin addiction...
 
I think the right way to answer this question is to point to an actual weakness, or something you have to work at. Don't dodge the question with things like "I'm a perfectionist" or "I'm a workaholic"--they don't really show any personal insight on your part. On the other hand don't tell us anything too scary i.e. the answer to your biggest weakness should not be your struggle with your heroin addiction...

Your answer, although admirable, is not the one that interview consultants (or med school and residency interviewers) advise. An actual weakness will be interpreted differently by different people, but usually to the applicant's detriment (not everyone has superstar recommendations and board scores). That's why the advisors say to put a positive spin on it.

Likewise, to say that "I'm a perfectionist" or "I'm a workaholic" is NOT dodging the question - those are actual, recognized faults, and certainly things that people can work at. Moreover, for someone to admit such things makes me wonder how you can say that those don't show any personal insight. Usually, the perfectionist just thinks that "that's the way it is, and should be", and workaholics don't think that they're working too much (just like the anorectic thinks they're fat).
 
I got one tough question - I was asked how does my faith impact the way I practice medicine.

Anyone know if the AOA will put us up for free in certain cities? That would be nice.

All of the questions mentioned are illegal, unless you bring them up rather than the interviewer. Then it gets fuzzy. For example, applicants frequently write about missionary activities or family in their experiences or personal statements. Or they may volunteer something in conversation. In these situations, the interviewer may reasonably assume that youare willing to talk about the forbidden subjects.

I have to say AR that the question you were asked is one I've never heard of before. I think it shows both a profound ignorance of law and is truly offensive in an interview setting, whether the questioner was a "committed christian" or a practicing atheist. I'm unsure if the question is illegal if the sponsoring institution is religious.

Some argue that there is no bad intent here, that the interviewers are just practicing Docs and residents who can't be expected to know the (ridiculous) vagaries of the law concerning discrimination. I doubt that that is true, I suspect that if you pinned the offenders down, it would turn out that:
1. they were perfectly aware that it was illegal.
2. they didn't care because their underlying belief is that this exercise is not a job interview, rather it is an attempt to determine if the applicant is prepared (morally, ethically, nonjudgmental, mature enough?) to be trained and accepted in the most responsible of professions. The problem with that is the interviewer's implicit assumption that his take on the relation of marriage, religion, sexuality, etc to being a good Doctor is the right one. But if we, the doctors, are not allowed to make this judgement, who shall? The lawyers? ouch.

But all this blathering aside, I think what AR was looking for was reactions about the right way to handle it. The general suggestion about how to handle illegal questions has been to lightly say something like "Does that affect my chances to be selected?" Although how you make that light, I don't know. The follow up reply in the face of persistence is "I'm sure you don't want to break the law by asking that question in an interview." And then go above his/her head to the PD.

But the objection to that line of defense is that you'll instantly be labeled as a trouble maker and the program can always hide behind the vagaries of the NRMP computer to explain your failure to match. I think there isn't too much you can do about illegal questions. Although i'd be tempted to do so if faced with AR's question. You probably wouldn't want to work for that guy anyway.
 
Your answer, although admirable, is not the one that interview consultants (or med school and residency interviewers) advise.

Depends on who you ask. I have heard the 'perfectionist' and 'workaholic' answers from some residents who were advising a friend of mine, but I was reading some helpful articles over at monster.com about job interviews in general (I recommend them to anyone here, just go to monster.com they have a whole library of them) and the article that included this question called the 'perfectionist/workaholic' answer the 'textbook answer' but suggested that that is what everyone says, and they also recommended that you use a weakness that you took steps to remedy. Their take on it was that the interviewer does not necessarily care what your weakness is, within reason, but just how you address it. I plan to play it that way - if you use knowledge as your area of weakness, it is just expected that a fourth year med student will not have the knowledge of a resident in certain areas so I can't imagine it will bother anyone. i.e. "I feel that one of my weaknesses is a lack of experience in the intensive care setting. Because I know that I will be spending time in the intensive care units during my intern year, I am scheduling a SICU elective in February to improve my knowledge base. (true)"

I don't know what is really going to work best, but I do think that my answer has more of a ring of honesty, and the 'perfectionist' answer (though I am a perfectionist and a workaholic in some ways, aren't we all?) sounds kind of slick and doesn't really tell the interviewer much, which I presume is the goal of the answer...
 
the 'perfectionist' answer (though I am a perfectionist and a workaholic in some ways, aren't we all?) sounds kind of slick and doesn't really tell the interviewer much, which I presume is the goal of the answer...

As I said, it's a real thing, and, considering your average med student and the obsessive/compulsive nature that MANY exhibit, with some foresight, it can be explained beyond the textbook/flat, not-expanded answer, and sound sincere and legitimate.

I mean, your example of a "weakness" being that you don't know something you haven't been taught yet (and will be) reeks more of a lack of insight or superficiality, since that's not a "weakness" at all.

I guess it's a difficult question, as I can't think of one that won't (in one way or another) damage your chances. I mean, if you say I can't stop speeding/I have HORRIBLE credit/I beat my wife/I party every night/I curse like a sailor/I smoke/I smoke pot/I smoke PCP-laced pot/I bite my toenails/I can't stop masturbating/I'm a sexaholic/I don't bathe too frequently/I have OCD and wash my hands 50 times a day or any other sundry things, it doesn't look good.

The only things I come up with are: "I'm kind of a slob/my residence is in disorder", or, "As I get older, I should really exercise more, but I really hate it and can't motivate myself (too well)", or, "I go to the gym, and hate every second of it and resent having to stay healthy through active effort". The exercise one is, possibly, the 'new' textbook answer. Now, if you say, "I'm diabetic, and exercise would help, but I prefer Glucophage", that's not the same thing.

I can't say. I don't recall if I've ever been asked the question, and it's moot now for me.
 
I mean, if you say I can't stop speeding/I have HORRIBLE credit/I beat my wife/I party every night/I curse like a sailor/I smoke/I smoke pot/I smoke PCP-laced pot/I bite my toenails/I can't stop masturbating/I'm a sexaholic/I don't bathe too frequently/I have OCD and wash my hands 50 times a day or any other sundry things, it doesn't look good..

Crap... I said all those things, I guess my interview friday didn't go too well then.
 
I can't say. I don't recall if I've ever been asked the question, and it's moot now for me.

It is putatively a blunt force approach to try to get at a very subtle concept; does the candidate have insight into his/her personality and enough energy/maturity to correct things he perceives as problems? I think it's actually just abuse

I've not used this one. Never heard of it providing useful info. Ally, I think you're right the "perfectionist" reply is a passive-aggressive response to a rude (given the circumstances) question. As such it irritates, but who cares, it closes a line of inquiry.

What to do, what to do? You might say something like: "I understand this is a pressure question, but I'm not going to take it that way. I think my greatest weakness is _________. And I'm trying to correct it by _________."

Fill in the blank with something relatively innocuous and true. Might be something like "I love Manolo Blahniks, but I can't afford them. Just gonna live with knockoffs till I get out of training."🙄
 
The thing is, most people can see through the "perfectionist" argument, and even if they can't, then you haven't said anything that sets yourself apart from the other people interviewing that day.

I was going to say Kluver-Bucy, but it may come across wrong. I'm still thinking of a good one that isn't too bad. Procrastinator seems like it would work.
 
"I have to say AR that the question you were asked is one I've never heard of before. I think it shows both a profound ignorance of law and is truly offensive in an interview setting, whether the questioner was a "committed christian" or a practicing atheist. I'm unsure if the question is illegal if the sponsoring institution is religious." - BKN


It actually didn't cross my mind as being illegal at the time. I just thought it was tough to answer. I basically answered that my faith helps me handle trying situations better, gossip less, and I confront people who gossip about me rather than get mad and start rumors about them. I said it with a little more grace at the time but I didn't really know how to answer that. I hope that wasn't too odd of an answer. It was just my gut response to what I really think my faith changes about me.
 
I just read something interesting about illegal interview questions... The gist was that the person asking the question probably has a legitimate concern along the lines of "are you really committed to this job, and are you going to pull your weight, or are you going to quit in six months, or make a habit of bailing on obligations at the last minute for questionable reasons, or give excuses for poor planning and organization that I can't legally question, thereby making more work for the other residents and more headache for me?"

The fact that they associate marriage, pregnancy, and parenthood with people who make unreasonable excuses or demands shows prejudice, but unfortunately everyone knows *someone* who's shirked duties in a really flagrant and unreasonable way while hiding behind their kids. The point is, the interviewer would be just as concerned about *anyone* with potential to be a habitual shirker, regardless of cause. So you can defuse the situation by answering the question they're *really* asking, rather than outright refusing (and giving up all chance of a match) or answering the question factually (giving in to the interviewer's prejudice). So you say "I understand your concern that family obligations could have a negative impact on my dedication as a resident, but I pride myself on dependability and have never let my personal life interfere with my performance on the job..." Maybe go on to assure them that you'd plan well in advance of any major changes in your family life, not have kids without setting up a robust support network, etc. All without actually saying whether you're married, have kids, or plan to.

Unless, of course, you *are* that person who never has their life quite under control and makes a habit of shirking duties with questionable child-related excuses... 😉
 
If a PD asks where else you are interviewing and then writes them all down, what purpose can that have. Is that a typical thing that happens?
Drakken
 
If a PD asks where else you are interviewing and then writes them all down, what purpose can that have. Is that a typical thing that happens?
Drakken

Did that really happen to you? and did you really tell them everywhere you're interviewing? Just curious if it's better to have a big or little number.
 
If a PD asks where else you are interviewing and then writes them all down, what purpose can that have. Is that a typical thing that happens?
Drakken

Perhaps it happens, I don't think it's very common. It's hard to know why we'd care. it shouldn't affect our list.
 
Did that really happen to you? and did you really tell them everywhere you're interviewing? Just curious if it's better to have a big or little number.

It happened to a really good buddy of mine and she freaked out a bit when she told them and they started writing them all down. I quess it made me wonder how much information about a candidate the PDs do share and if they communicate whether they really liked or did not like something about an applicant to each other. I guess it could be a bad or a good thing but I thought it was curious. Is there a good way to answer someone about other places you are interviewing except to tell them where they are? Maybe say predominantly in one area or ask if that really matters to the program. Can someone chime in on that situation? Thanks.
Drakken
 
Did that really happen to you? and did you really tell them everywhere you're interviewing? Just curious if it's better to have a big or little number.

Was asked today, straight up, by two interviewers: "where else are you applying/interviewing?"

Didn't really find it intrusive or sinister in either case though. One person was a pgy-II who was interviewing me, and was just making small talk. We just talked about some of the other nearby programs that he had also interviewed at and that I was looking into. Just a friendly chat. He didn't write anything down or demand a comprehensive list, and I just gave geographic generalities and a couple of nearby names.

The other was an older attending-type, who actually brought it up a couple times. He seemed interested mostly in my opinion of my home institution's program, since its new, and we talked about the place he trained some years ago that I also applied to. He also suggested some nice places to apply to, assuming I liked his current program (places I hadn't applied to as of this moment). But again, he didn't ask for a comprehensive list, he didn't write anything down, and he didn't seem all that concerned with exactly what I said... mostly a conversation starter.

I can see how this question might bother people, and certainly could be used in weird ways by a program (if you are the conspiracy theory type)🙂 , but I think it is usually asked just in interest of making conversation.
 
Yes, I agree that although writing stuff down is a little weird it was probably just to size up the competition. Thanks.
Drakken
 
Regarding the greatest weakness question, I struggled with that during interview season, too. My mom had just finished interviewing for a bunch of jobs (in accounting, not so much medical) and said that her answer is always "perfectionism." I didn't want to say a textbook answer and wanted to be more open, but not admit to my clandestine meth lab or crazy family stories. I was torn between "I can work, but can't read about medicine and learn well, when I'm tired and that is most of the time right now" and "I am hard on myself for stupid stuff and if I'm not careful, it distracts me from my work." I settled on the latter and emphasized that I was aware of it and it was something I had been working on and was continuing to work on and that I always get my work done, I could just get it done a bit better if I focused more on important things. It's a variation of the perfectionist thing, but truly can affect me and requires management, rather than just being a weakness that sounds really good. I think BKN is right on in saying that this question is more about self-reflection and maturity as it is about anything else.
 
I was going to say Kluver-Bucy, but it may come across wrong. I'm still thinking of a good one that isn't too bad. Procrastinator seems like it would work.

Biggest Weakness: Guillian-Burre or acute ischemic stroke or UTI in an old lady😀
 
biceps.. me and chuck are working on them though. Total Gym rocks!
 
On the biggest weakness question, I go with being quiet/shy. I have come a long ways compared to years back. However, I do point out that once I open up, those around me start looking for the duct tape....or a sock.
 
I have a new hated question. One that I think is against the rules actually.


I was asked where I had applied to, which is often. When I said those, I was asked which ones I liked. What kind of scumbag thing is it to ask that?
 
I have a new hated question. One that I think is against the rules actually.


I was asked where I had applied to, which is often. When I said those, I was asked which ones I liked. What kind of scumbag thing is it to ask that?

I hear you. I have gotten this question at every interview. Recently it hasn't been a problem because the programs I have interest in/like are of the same "type" as the program that is asking the question. However, I will soon be interviewing at a few programs that don't fit that "type" and I will be forced to give a more vague and less precise answer. Yuck! I too wonder if it is "match legal" to ask this.
ncc
 
I hear you. I have gotten this question at every interview. Recently it hasn't been a problem because the programs I have interest in/like are of the same "type" as the program that is asking the question. However, I will soon be interviewing at a few programs that don't fit that "type" and I will be forced to give a more vague and less precise answer. Yuck! I too wonder if it is "match legal" to ask this.
ncc

I never thought this question was a big deal. I know when I take the applicants out to dinner, I always wind up asking where all they're interviewing, where they did away rotations, etc. It's probably one of the easiest things to talk about because we all have common experiences and we've met some of the same people. Also, it let's me kind of compare and contrast my program to some of the other programs they may already be familiar with. That can help them know if it would be a good fit or not for them and us. I certainly don't do it to make people uncomfortable.
 
Herc,
It is one thing at the dinner. You can ask the residents where they interviewed, what they thought, etc. It is very low key.
It is another thing for the PD or chair to sit there and grill you on it, asking what you specifically liked at certain places, and what you didn't like. You have to sit there and think of places that are similar in your mind to the place you are at (so as not to kill your chances there), but they might not be the same to the person asking the question. Yeah, county programs are similar, but not all of the smaller programs are very similar.
 
I hear you. I have gotten this question at every interview. Recently it hasn't been a problem because the programs I have interest in/like are of the same "type" as the program that is asking the question. However, I will soon be interviewing at a few programs that don't fit that "type" and I will be forced to give a more vague and less precise answer. Yuck! I too wonder if it is "match legal" to ask this.
ncc
You're thinking way too hard about this. They're probably asking out of genuine curiosity rather than to figure out if you're interviewing at similar programs. Just be honest and chill out.
 
As far as the "biggest weakness" question goes, using "perfectionism" is truly a lame answer. You should take a real weakness...(everybody has them), and talk about how you've improved, or even better, spin it as a strength. Interviewing skills 101 right there.
 
My greatest weakness is warm tortilla chips and really good salsa.

And I freely admitted that when I interviewed.
 
What will you contribute to our program?

What are some problems / weaknesses you may have during residency?

What makes you a person that is made for EM (something about your character, personality, etc)?

Besides questions like above, I found it challenging if the interviewer disagreed with me on an issue or if they point out something in your future plan that does not seem like a good idea to them. What do you do in such situations?
 
At every interview, I get asked about the institution where I did my away rotation. It is usually followed by a questions of how it compares to my home institution. I also get asked where I am interviewing.
 
I was asked at an earlier interview as to why even though I'm hispanic, why do I look more caucausian than the interviewer. My response...Genetics.

And today, I was asked for the first time about where I was interviewing. It was odd in that the interviewer said he was trying to find out "what I was thinking," and had a comment about every hospital as to whether it was similar to his particular place or not.
 
I got asked about my family and how that impacts my decision in EM. I'm married, no kids, nothing unique to really spur the question. It was from a R3.
 
On every interview I have gone on (for my previous career in law as well), I have always been asked "what are your greatest weaknesses". I really disliked the canned answer of "I am a perfectionist".

For EM, what would you guys think about someone who answered- I get bored easily-- which is why EM is the ideal field for me-- you never know what is going to come through the door.
 
where are you interviewing; what programs in particular; what are your top choices 😕
 
Oh- if this was directed to me, I am a second year right now so I am obviously not applying anywhere for residency this year or next. I meant that in my college interviews, medical school interviews and interviews for positions at law firms, I have been asked the dreaded "what are your greatest weaknesses" question. From what many of you have said here, I guess I should expect to encounter it again.

I just thought the discussion on this thread was interesting and was curious as to how you pros would perceive such an answer. 🙂
 
I have a new hated question. One that I think is against the rules actually.


I was asked where I had applied to, which is often. When I said those, I was asked which ones I liked. What kind of scumbag thing is it to ask that?

From a resident point of view, when we ask this question it is usually in order to spark some small talk. I have asked this question quite often and didn't think that it was a big deal. I can understand that if a PD or a member of the residency leadership asked then it could spark some anxiety. I am asked quite often how our program compares to others in the area or why I chose my program as opposed to others; it helps to know who I am up against so that I can contrast/compare the programs.

The worst question I ever got asked was "Tell me about a time when you felt humbled?", I knew it was particularly bad since I had just gone on a huge tirade about how I didn't want to do a intern year before I started EM because I thought that my medical school prepared me very well clinically. I knew that I was done at that very moment, the interviewer (who was the PD) thought I was an overconfident a-hole. I really should have just excused myself and walked out.
 
Top