- Joined
- Dec 8, 2007
- Messages
- 55
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Pre-Health (Field Undecided)


where did you hear that and for what schools or adcoms? it just seems like such a waste of time, effort, and money for both parties and they have better candidates who they actually would accept to interview. They turn down so many good ones i dont' understand which ones would actually have the time and other stuff to interview people they would reject.
I have heard that some adcoms already know a person will be rejected just by looking at an applicant's application, but still end up interviewing them anyways. So what is the point of even interviewing them in the first place? Has anyone heard of this?
i'd believe it. just like applicants apply to "safety schools", schools also interview "safety candidates". these people are not the schools first choice but if they don't have a full class they turn to these people. some are rejected outright, some are placed on the waitlist (most of these will turn to rejections).

DRAT!!!...That one cut real deep dmd2011. You mind pouring some more salt on my wound![]()
DRAT!!!...That one cut real deep dmd2011. You mind pouring some more salt on my wound![]()
I have a hard time believeing that a school will interivew someone with no desire of accepting them. I think these are tales that just get passed on between nervous applicants.
To put an applicant through all that for nothing is crazy, I refuse to believe that people can be that inconsiderate.
That's how I felt at my Penn and Tufts interviews last year. They were both in early Feb. and I ended up on the perpetual "waitlist" and never got accepted.
Im afraid I must agree. Last year i interviewed and felt that was exactly what was going on. They build a safety net of students as we build a safety net of schools to apply to. Unfortunatly, I believe this is the reality. 👎
That's how I felt at my Penn and Tufts interviews last year. They were both in early Feb. and I ended up on the perpetual "waitlist" and never got accepted.
I am thinking most interviews after Dec 1st are for waitlisted spots...It sucks b/c I am still waiting on ONE more interview...
I got waitlisted to Penn with an interview on November...I think if a school really likes you and wants to ACCEPT you they will most likely interview you on Sept or Oct...


I agree if they REALLY want to, but what if you're not one of those ppl that they really want but just want because you're competitive but just not SUPER competitive and at the top. Schools still fill their seats with these applicants as well so when do they get picked up, because esp. for those schools that interviewed starting later in the year (like pitt seems like it only started in mid october) then for those it's not unreasonable to think that a post-dec interview is neccesarily for a waitlist right?
At this point though the interview invities seem to be for feb and on which isn't the best position but there has to be some schools like BU that still have tons of seats left. right? i hope so, i reaaallyyy hope so!! It's bad enough waiting for late interviews but now realizing that even late interviews are really rejections or waitlist positions in disguise is awful. 😕
Where are all those great stories about people that got accepted and interviewed post-dec? we need some more motivation please! 😳
During my Louisville interview, I had lunch with a D2. He told me that his interview was late - sometime around late Jan. and he was accepted just 1 week after his interview.