Intracept

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Are u seeing the results long term? I sent 2 pts out to an hospital based guy, first guy have only modic findings and failed everything else, axial pain, obese, no stenosis- did great for 2 months now pain back/worse than prior with no new changes on mri.
What’s the long term been for these patients?
 
Are u seeing the results long term? I sent 2 pts out to an hospital based guy, first guy have only modic findings and failed everything else, axial pain, obese, no stenosis- did great for 2 months now pain back/worse than prior with no new changes on mri.
What’s the long term been for these patients?
I wouldn’t call that the pain coming back… I would call that just a total failure.
 
Are u seeing the results long term? I sent 2 pts out to an hospital based guy, first guy have only modic findings and failed everything else, axial pain, obese, no stenosis- did great for 2 months now pain back/worse than prior with no new changes on mri.
What’s the long term been for these patients?
No new changes on MRI? Doesn’t Intracept produce some lesions on MRI? Maybe they didn’t burn long enough.
 
Are u seeing the results long term? I sent [emoji638] pts out to an hospital based guy, first guy have only modic findings and failed everything else, axial pain, obese, no stenosis- did great for [emoji638] months now pain back/worse than prior with no new changes on mri.
What’s the long term been for these patients?

N=[emoji637][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]-[emoji638][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]]]. All of my patients were fails or successes. No successes that then had return of pain.
 
Similar to literature but I would say smaller standard deviation. Majority between 50-90% better. The rest split between 90-100% or 0-50%.

140+ cases. Results pretty closely match the 2 RCTs

I don’t have as much experience as both of you. Done a dozen cases. 11/12 got 80% relief, 1 zero relief. (That patient also failed RFA, had a severely degenerative disc + some instability)

The odd thing is that all my other 11 cases all achieved 80% relief. No patient had significantly more or less such as 50% or 100% relief. Just one failure and then 11 patients with 80% relief.

Not sure if it makes a difference but all these cases are commercial insurance.

WC doesn’t cover yet and medicare pays so poorly that I send all Medicare intracept cases to HOPD employed docs.
 
Last edited:
I think you will see a different mix in the older Medicare crowd. Many have multiple pain generators. I’ve done 50 cases and the results seem to follow the literature. Quite a few seem to take several months to demonstrate improvement. In addition we have had several state they are no better but ther ODI shows greater than 50%improvement
 
Results mirror literature. Follow patients to a year with PROs. 100+ cases. Follow clinical trial inclusion/exclusion criteria, but will on occasion will deviate from said criteria as a last resort without much success.
 
It’s interesting that I’ve treated 30 cases so far, mostly older patients. Surprisingly, I’ve found only 50% of them experience 50% relief. I’ve even seen patients from large academic centers, and they don’t respond to intercepts as effectively as literature reported.
 
done 200+ cases. Success rates still mirror literature. Key is classic symptoms and imaging. Success decreases when deviate. Commercial insurance coverage still poor. Still pays peanuts in pro fee. Only viable at higher volumes for docs who own asc/hopd until commercial insurance coverage/rates come around.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
done 200+ cases. Success rates still mirror literature. Key is classic symptoms and imaging. Success decreases when deviate. Commercial insurance coverage still poor. Still pays peanuts in pro fee. Only viable at higher volumes for docs who own asc/hopd until commercial insurance coverage/rates come around.
Can you describe your selection process?
 
done 200+ cases. Success rates still mirror literature. Key is classic symptoms and imaging. Success decreases when deviate. Commercial insurance coverage still poor. Still pays peanuts in pro fee. Only viable at higher volumes for docs who own asc/hopd until commercial insurance coverage/rates come around.
Well said.
I just trained. I send 10 per year to local docs for classic symptoms and 0/10 getting them done. 3 came back with failed scs trials. Insurance was mostly limiting. As a doc who gets to use OR for cases when desired or required and can book 1 case a month or 3 per week without worrying about costs or rvu: it was time I learned something new. CMS pays 13k to hospital for the cpt. I get 7 rwrvu. Patient gets me choosing if we do it and how we do it.

Sim training in office was amazing.
 
Well said.
I just trained. I send 10 per year to local docs for classic symptoms and 0/10 getting them done. 3 came back with failed scs trials. Insurance was mostly limiting. As a doc who gets to use OR for cases when desired or required and can book 1 case a month or 3 per week without worrying about costs or rvu: it was time I learned something new. CMS pays 13k to hospital for the cpt. I get 7 rwrvu. Patient gets me choosing if we do it and how we do it.

Sim training in office was amazing.
I’m over 100 with all but 5 in the HOPD procedure suite with a little iv sedation(100ug fentanyl or less). I would echo that results follows the literature. It’s not a great time value for me but it mostly works. My usual time for a 2 vertebral body case is 25 minutes , but I refuse to do any cases in the or due to anesthesia turnover essentially. Almost solely Medicare cases at this point. Humana Medicare has covered it and we have done a few Aetna Medicare after lengthy appeal process.
 
done 200+ cases. Success rates still mirror literature. Key is classic symptoms and imaging. Success decreases when deviate. Commercial insurance coverage still poor. Still pays peanuts in pro fee. Only viable at higher volumes for docs who own asc/hopd until commercial insurance coverage/rates come around.
You think that commercial will come around. I am skeptical
 
You think that commercial will come around. I am skeptical
They have a little bit… Cigna came on board a couple years ago, which was huge, it was then unfortunatelylost when they transitioned to evicore for all their interventional pain authorizations. Carelon has a positive written coverage coverage policy. Several of the different state/region specific blues around the country have positive coverage. I just got an approval with United for the first time. Aetna has been 0%. My main local Blue Cross is unfortunately a no go despite them using Carelon for their other pain/spine procedures. Highmark covers. Tricare covers. Humana covers. Traditional Medicare. Granted, the largest group of prototypical patients have commercial insurance.


That said, I do remain skeptical. It has been four years since Medicare started to cover.
 
I'm probably close to 200. Results at least as good as literature. Trying to be cognizant of potential recall bias, but I think my results are better than literature. Mostly all commercial so younger pop, focal Modic, less multifactorial. I'm usually surprised if someone is <75% better. HCSC, Tricare were more recent coverage additions, in addition to multiple states Blues.
 
I'm probably close to 200. Results at least as good as literature. Trying to be cognizant of potential recall bias, but I think my results are better than literature. Mostly all commercial so younger pop, focal Modic, less multifactorial. I'm usually surprised if someone is <75% better. HCSC, Tricare were more recent coverage additions, in addition to multiple states Blues.
This sounds right. I would think younger patients with classic symptoms and only 1-2 level modic changes with little else would respond best. Makes sense then that @SC Tian wouldn't see stellar results if older patient population with concomitant facet arthropathy, multifidi atrophy, long standing disc degeneration and listhesis and possible instability.
 
This sounds right. I would think younger patients with classic symptoms and only 1-2 level modic changes with little else would respond best. Makes sense then that @SC Tian wouldn't see stellar results if older patient population with concomitant facet arthropathy, multifidi atrophy, long standing disc degeneration and listhesis and possible instability.
That’s been my experience as well, with a mostly Medicare aged population. For those patients I discuss the literature based rates but I do warn them that in their case, with multiple potential sources of spine pain, they're unlikely to get total relief.
 
That’s been my experience as well, with a mostly Medicare aged population. For those patients I discuss the literature based rates but I do warn them that in their case, with multiple potential sources of spine pain, they're unlikely to get total relief.
Can someone please explain where BVNA fits in with your treatment approach? Most of my patients have modic changes, but I usually would be exhausting RFA and epidurals first.
 
Can someone please explain where BVNA fits in with your treatment approach? Most of my patients have modic changes, but I usually would be exhausting RFA and epidurals first.
Same. Although wouldn’t necessarily say most of my patients have Modic changes. I’ll always try MBB/RFA first since that is less invasive and well documented in the literature to be not predictable based on PE or imaging (and much better reimbursement for the time spent).
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I’m not gonna get it into the history/exam findings and literature on how to delineate as best as possible between axial back pain generators… But let’s just say…. When all the bread n butter stuff doesn’t work, you have convinced yourself it’s not facet or SIJ (whether it be clinical or blocks), they have chronic mod-severe axial pain, discs with modic changes, no major deformity or instability to warrant surgery…. Bvna time
 
I’m not gonna get it into the history/exam findings and literature on how to delineate as best as possible between axial back pain generators… But let’s just say…. When all the bread n butter stuff doesn’t work, you have convinced yourself it’s not facet or SIJ (whether it be clinical or blocks), they have chronic mod-severe axial pain, discs with modic changes, no major deformity or instability to warrant surgery…. Bvna time
This was also my understanding. I guess I just don’t see enough patients or maybe my patients are just older and other pain generators are more dominant than this. Thanks
 
This was also my understanding. I guess I just don’t see enough patients or maybe my patients are just older and other pain generators are more dominant than this. Thanks
I do see some Medicare patients who are a good candidates for this, but that small percentage is the exception and majority are younger with commercial insurance. Problem is… majority of those younger patients cannot get it approved by their insurance. It is incredibly frustrating, as I get a lot of referrals for it, including many from spine surgeons on patients who have truly failed all else.
 
I am glad to see success. I have given up on it because of the results and really it just isnt worth my time. I have since just decided to use my time more effectively and just refer them out if indicated but haven't seen results on those either. The n is definitely low at 15-20. Because of what you have said I am going to be more patient and still refer it.
 
N = 100ish

1/3 minimal results
1/3 50% relief
1/3 pain free

All comers. Have been shocked quite a few times with excellent results in 80 yo+ crew with multilevel changes L3/4/5/S1

Anyone else being affected by Boston kit recall? I have 3 scheduled tomorrow, one United that took an arm and a leg to get approved, and I'm going to try the Stryker system. It's an L5-S1 so hoping I don't get burned.
 
N = 100ish

1/3 minimal results
1/3 50% relief
1/3 pain free

All comers. Have been shocked quite a few times with excellent results in 80 yo+ crew with multilevel changes L3/4/5/S1

Anyone else being affected by Boston kit recall? I have 3 scheduled tomorrow, one United that took an arm and a leg to get approved, and I'm going to try the Stryker system. It's an L5-S1 so hoping I don't get burned.
Talk to your Boston rep. New kits are in, my cases tomorrow are good to go.
 
What's the scuttle butt on the recall? Seems to have hit their RF products across the line
Something about the outer tray seal out of spec. Nothingburger.

Given Taus experience with Stryker and this, I would not chance it. Hard bone is not uncommon.
 
Something about the outer tray seal out of spec. Nothingburger.

Given Taus experience with Stryker and this, I would not chance it. Hard bone is not uncommon.
Yeah, I haven't had that issue with Stryker's system as their introducer is a lot more robust, but every patient/physician is different.

I'm just confused as to why the rest of Boston's RF cannula were recalled. Folks out there doing their normal RFs with 15 cm needles instead of 5/10 just to keep the lights on
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
They have a little bit… Cigna came on board a couple years ago, which was huge, it was then unfortunatelylost when they transitioned to evicore for all their interventional pain authorizations. Carelon has a positive written coverage coverage policy. Several of the different state/region specific blues around the country have positive coverage. I just got an approval with United for the first time. Aetna has been 0%. My main local Blue Cross is unfortunately a no go despite them using Carelon for their other pain/spine procedures. Highmark covers. Tricare covers. Humana covers. Traditional Medicare. Granted, the largest group of prototypical patients have commercial insurance.


That said, I do remain skeptical. It has been four years since Medicare started to cover.
Over my state, United Health approves Intracept but does not reimburse the kit. They do not consider Intracept as implant material. Have you encountered this issue before? Thanks.
 
Over my state, United Health approves Intracept but does not reimburse the kit. They do not consider Intracept as implant material. Have you encountered this issue before? Thanks.
Yeah, I think they reimbursement is set to include the cost of the kit but I'm a simple hospital based doc. As there isn't a real implant here per se to transfer the cost on like in an SCS IPG or cement, it should be okay, but you're just looking now for the cheapest/best consumable.

I saw Elliquence is getting an ablation system on board if you want to sneak that into your ecosystem via BVNA
 
Something about the outer tray seal out of spec. Nothingburger.

Given Taus experience with Stryker and this, I would not chance it. Hard bone is not uncommon.
I had a Stryker trocar break off in a patient
 
Yeah, I think they reimbursement is set to include the cost of the kit but I'm a simple hospital based doc. As there isn't a real implant here per se to transfer the cost on like in an SCS IPG or cement, it should be okay, but you're just looking now for the cheapest/best consumable.

I saw Elliquence is getting an ablation system on board if you want to sneak that into your ecosystem via BVNA
United Health only reimbursed a facility fee of $3,000 in an ASC setting here.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Just finished my first case with Stryker. Had them open 8g trochar for S1, was nervous to use 10g. Went through 3 peek sleeves but got the case done safely. Tips kept shearing. My Boston kits literally just arrived so I’m switching back for my next 2 cases.
 
Just finished my first case with Stryker. Had them open 8g trochar for S1, was nervous to use 10g. Went through 3 peek sleeves but got the case done safely. Tips kept shearing. My Boston kits literally just arrived so I’m switching back for my next 2 cases.
Glad you got through the case, good call on the 8g. That is what I used when I was forced to use them again due to the recall. I also took larger angles than typical just in case I had rock hard bone and could not get the J/peak through without bending/kinking again. I also firmly gripped the exposed part of J outside trochar and was very careful that all hard mallet strikes were square to avoid bending it again there on hard bone. It did work ok that way.
 
Can someone please explain where BVNA fits in with your treatment approach? Most of my patients have modic changes, but I usually would be exhausting RFA and epidurals first.
Apologies if this has already been mentioned, but apparently there is some emerging literature regarding better/more durable outcomes in patients with Modic 1 changes as opposed to Modic 2. I have anecdotally seen this in my practice but my n=30. As you all know, the patients with Modic 1 are typically younger with commercial insurance and so much harder to get insurance approval -- but for us the Intracept portal has been very clutch in this regard. However I still try MBBs first almost always.
 
I had a Stryker bone tumor case today that had previously received radiation (so rock hard bone) and separate first BVNA through Stryker. Their J really isn’t sturdy enough for hard bone. Having said that, the rep and I found that malleting their curette first to create a pilot tract for the J to then follow worked surprisingly well.