intubation without muscle relaxant?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

ketap

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2009
Messages
171
Reaction score
1
i had a patient who was predicted to be difficult for bag mask ventilation and laryngoscopic view (short neck, short TMD, large tongue, edentulous and no artificial teeth) ..the patient 65 years old, estimated weight 60 Kg, diagnosed as hemorrhagic stroke causing intracerebral edema (detected by CTscan)..this patient had a GCS of 6-7(still has gag reflex), so we wanted to intubate the patient..the vital signs was still quiet stable.
we intubated the patient with propofol 6o mg only (i didn't want to use the our only available muscle relaxant succynilcholin because i was afraid with its effect on ICP and the difficult airway).. after reaching the time to peak effect of propofol, i tried to intubate the patient, but the mouth was still very stiff in this patient and so, it was so hard for me to intubate this patient. i think i might have made mistakes in this patient and i need to evaluate myself so,i need to ask some questions to all of you...

1.actually, is it possible to proceed intubation without any drugs? when? and on what GCS will it be?
2. how can i manage the stiffness? should i increase the dose of propofol?thx u
 
How high was his BP? I think you gave too little propofol. If his SBP was >130 or a MAP >80, I would have used at least 90mg of propofol. What's his EF? maybe you just needed to wait a few seconds longer because of poor circulation?
 
Ketap, your thought process is a bit off in my book. Someone with a potential difficult airway either gets an awake intubation or gets a muscle relaxant to maximize the chance of success. There are a few exceptions to this rule but not in this case.
 
A hefty dose of iv lidocaine with the propofol might have helped without much hemodynamic/resp consequences.
 
Intubating without an adequate induction dose will raise that ICP higher than tubing with succs
 
Intubating without an adequate induction dose will raise that ICP higher than tubing with succs

Actually raise it MUCH higher if you caused a sympathetic surge. I would of def added some fentanyl and lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg). Also a defasiculating dose of nondepolarizer abolishes the increase in ICP from sux (mech is unknown).
 
How high was his BP? I think you gave too little propofol. If his SBP was >130 or a MAP >80, I would have used at least 90mg of propofol. What's his EF? maybe you just needed to wait a few seconds longer because of poor circulation?
RussianJoo: i don't know what the EF in this patient because i was in rural hospital and there is no echocardiography in this hospital....

i don't think the patient had a poor circulation..the patient had a BP around 130/70 mmHg (not the invasive one though) ,MAP 60-70 mmHg, pulse 110x/minutes and it was strong, full and regular , the Urine Output without diuretic about 1cc/kg/hour..i have waited for 2 minutes (time to peak effect of propofol) ,but still it was to stiff..was it because i used the dose ( 1mg/kg BW) that usually combined with other drugs(opioid and muscle relaxant)? if i want to use the propofol only,should i use a higher dose than usual? how much?

A hefty dose of iv lidocaine with the propofol might have helped without much hemodynamic/resp consequences.
Urge: i have thought about it also ( as an exchange for the fentanyl which i don't have in my place) , but i have lack experience using the lidocaine..what lidocaine concentration should i use? 1% or 2%?


Ketap, your thought process is a bit off in my book. Someone with a potential difficult airway either gets an awake intubation or gets a muscle relaxant to maximize the chance of success. There are a few exceptions to this rule but not in this case.
hi,Ketafol20: well,there was no anesthesiologist in that time because he was sick and i have tried to contact him,but it was so hard to contact him...because it was in the rural area, not many anesthesiologist in this hospital..btw, why using muscle relaxan in the difficult airway? could you show me what book you are referring to ,so i can read it too..i do need a good book about this, because almost all books (including benumof's) don't talk much about this technique..
thx u so much to all of you who responding my questions 🙂
 
Last edited:
ketap said:
hi,Ketafol20: well,there was no anesthesiologist in that time because he was sick and i have tried to contact him,but it was so hard to contact him...because it was in the rural area, not many anesthesiologist in this hospital..btw, why using muscle relaxan in the difficult airway? could you show me what book you are referring to ,so i can read it too..i do need a good book about this, because almost all books (including benumof's) don't talk much about this technique..
thx u so much to all of you who responding my questions 🙂

before we get ahead of ourselves do you mind giving me an idea of your medical training?
 
Ketafol20: well, i am basically a general physician, so i have no anesthesia training besides when i was having my internship and of course , i still have lack of airway management practice , but i am very interested in airway management ( so i read quiet many books, but quiet lack of practice though) as i am having interest to anesthesiology also..i am very sorry if my question disturbing or feel like offending you, i didn't mean to, i am not that good in english, so i am sorry if my intention sounds like offending you..i just need some book info if i am lacking something.thx u🙂
 
it is a fairly universal belief that your best laryngoscopic view, and thus chance at successful intubation, is in the patient who is fully relaxed, be it following rapid sequence induction with nondepolarizer/depolarizer or more controlled induction after verifying mask ventilation.

i think without fail everyone on this board will tell you that once you made the decision to push 60mg of propofol in the obtunded patient, your next move should be: a) push 30-60mg more propofol, b) push relaxant, c) DL and intubate, d) have LMA and vasoactive drugs available. any rise in ICP will be transient, and is of secondary concern to the secured airway, in my opinion.
 
Urge: i have thought about it also ( as an exchange for the fentanyl which i don't have in my place) , but i have lack experience using the lidocaine..what lidocaine concentration should i use? 1% or 2%?

100mg total (1.5mg/kg). 5ml of 2%, or 10ml of 1%. It's the same thing.
 
Ketafol20: well, i am basically a general physician, so i have no anesthesia training besides when i was having my internship and of course , i still have lack of airway management practice , but i am very interested in airway management ( so i read quiet many books, but quiet lack of practice though) as i am having interest to anesthesiology also..i am very sorry if my question disturbing or feel like offending you, i didn't mean to, i am not that good in english, so i am sorry if my intention sounds like offending you..i just need some book info if i am lacking something.thx u🙂

I'm not offended at all. I could just tell that you were not an anesthesiologist and I needed an idea of your level of knowledge before I started to help.

I would grab any good anesthesia book (maybe someone here has a favorite, I don't) and read the chapters on airway management and induction drugs and muscle relaxants. The idea is that if you are needing to intubate a person with a difficult airway then you need to optimize the conditions. The most optimal condition is a fully relaxed pt so that there is no resistance. Even though they are asleep they will have some residual muscle tension that will decrease your ability to get a good view. What people frequently get hung up on is that they don't want to paralyze a difficult airway pt in case they can't intubate. If they can't intubate they hope to be able to wake the pt up. My point is that if you don't paralyze then you are making everything more difficult including mask ventilation. Use a short acting muscle relaxant in this case like succinylcholine. It gives profound muscle relaxation quickly and will be gone in 5-10 minutes.

Feel free to ask more.
 
I think we may be missing the boat here. A patient who is anticipated to be a difficult mask ventilation and difficult intubation should be intubated awake/spontaneously breathing. ICP be damned, although you can optimize this with generous topicalization and some light sedation (a little midaz vs precedex) if you need it, but airway trumps ICP in my opinion. As far as I know, there is no cause of increased ICP that is improved by hypoventilation/hypoxia/death. Plus this guy's ICP doesn't sound critical if he's still tachycardic. My plan would be to take a deep breath, premed with glyco, load with precedex prn, topicalize the s%^$ out of the airway using your cocktail of choice, and bang out awake FOBI with minimal hemodynamic/ICP compromise.
 
I think we may be missing the boat here. A patient who is anticipated to be a difficult mask ventilation and difficult intubation should be intubated awake/spontaneously breathing. ICP be damned, although you can optimize this with generous topicalization and some light sedation (a little midaz vs precedex) if you need it, but airway trumps ICP in my opinion. As far as I know, there is no cause of increased ICP that is improved by hypoventilation/hypoxia/death. Plus this guy's ICP doesn't sound critical if he's still tachycardic. My plan would be to take a deep breath, premed with glyco, load with precedex prn, topicalize the s%^$ out of the airway using your cocktail of choice, and bang out awake FOBI with minimal hemodynamic/ICP compromise.

Ding ding ding, we have a winner!!!
 
i have intubated without drugs but always at a code. at a lot of codes they are down and no drugs of any kind are necessary. if they are not down, etomidate (its whats in the box). fentanyl if i don't have to wait for it. sux if someone can tell me a little about the pt, labs, etc. i find that i don't often need relaxant.
in the situation of a difficult airway, difficult mask possibility i would probably go for the sux w defasciculating dose of roc. have a glidescope and a bougie.
i sort of feel like FOI is going to be all but obsolete in the future with the only remaining indication lack of mouth opening. i have yet to see an airway that you couldn't get the view on the glidescope... getting the view doesn't mean you can alway navigate the glottic opening with the tube but the bougie, no prob.
we had a lady w documented failed DL that had to be awake FOI with every other surgery she had had at OSHs. she looked like it too. huge BMI, no TMD, limited neck and OA ROM, large submandibular fat deposits, very restricted chest wall compliance d/t adiposity (is that a word? im trying to be p.c.). staff for the day, somewhat of a cowboy (which i mean the with the utmost respect and admiration, not in a derogatory way at all) didn't want to FOI. we ramped her well and glidescoped so easily... i am a huge glidescope fan... piece of cake -- i should buy stock in verathon 🙂 --
that does bring up a good point tho.... positioning (external auditory meatus aligned with sternal notch) is KEY!!!
of course if this case comes up on the oral boards its awake FOI 🙂
 
i have intubated without drugs but always at a code. at a lot of codes they are down and no drugs of any kind are necessary. if they are not down, etomidate (its whats in the box). fentanyl if i don't have to wait for it. sux if someone can tell me a little about the pt, labs, etc. i find that i don't often need relaxant.
in the situation of a difficult airway, difficult mask possibility i would probably go for the sux w defasciculating dose of roc. have a glidescope and a bougie.
i sort of feel like FOI is going to be all but obsolete in the future with the only remaining indication lack of mouth opening. i have yet to see an airway that you couldn't get the view on the glidescope... getting the view doesn't mean you can alway navigate the glottic opening with the tube but the bougie, no prob.
we had a lady w documented failed DL that had to be awake FOI with every other surgery she had had at OSHs. she looked like it too. huge BMI, no TMD, limited neck and OA ROM, large submandibular fat deposits, very restricted chest wall compliance d/t adiposity (is that a word? im trying to be p.c.). staff for the day, somewhat of a cowboy (which i mean the with the utmost respect and admiration, not in a derogatory way at all) didn't want to FOI. we ramped her well and glidescoped so easily... i am a huge glidescope fan... piece of cake -- i should buy stock in verathon 🙂 --
that does bring up a good point tho.... positioning (external auditory meatus aligned with sternal notch) is KEY!!!
of course if this case comes up on the oral boards its awake FOI 🙂

here comes my "old guy" rant about kids these days and their damned glidescopes/hula hoops/nintendos (even though I only graduated a year ago). Awake FOBI still very much has a place at the table, and I think this is being lost on the current generation of anesthesia residents who think they can put a tube in anybody with a glidescope/mcgrath/etc. If you never do awake airways, you never gain experience in the most crucial part: the topicalization. If your awake intubations are gruesome and painful for the patients, you're doing it wrong and you need more practice. If you can truly intubate anyone totally expediently with a glidescope and they never desat before you can get the tube in and never need to be masked while you readjust things/get equipment/get help, then more power to you, but the day you find out you can't, somebody dies.

Now I agree that I have decreased the number of AFOBI I do since the introduction of video laryngoscopes, but I would still definitely not put somebody to sleep if I didn't think I could ventilate them. What do you have to gain? Patient might not have to "suffer" through awake intubation, but they may have anoxic brain injury? Sounds like small upside with a huge potential downside. Of course, FOBI is not the only awake airway choice. At a conference I went to last winter, the airway jockeys described awake intubation through an intubating LMA as well as awake glide scope intubation and of course the classic awake DL (all with appropriate topicalization, of course), but the key word here was AWAKE.
 
i had a patient who was predicted to be difficult for bag mask ventilation and laryngoscopic view (short neck, short TMD, large tongue, edentulous and no artificial teeth) ..the patient 65 years old, estimated weight 60 Kg, diagnosed as hemorrhagic stroke causing intracerebral edema (detected by CTscan)..this patient had a GCS of 6-7(still has gag reflex), so we wanted to intubate the patient..the vital signs was still quiet stable.
we intubated the patient with propofol 6o mg only (i didn't want to use the our only available muscle relaxant succynilcholin because i was afraid with its effect on ICP and the difficult airway).. after reaching the time to peak effect of propofol, i tried to intubate the patient, but the mouth was still very stiff in this patient and so, it was so hard for me to intubate this patient. i think i might have made mistakes in this patient and i need to evaluate myself so,i need to ask some questions to all of you...

1.actually, is it possible to proceed intubation without any drugs? when? and on what GCS will it be?
2. how can i manage the stiffness? should i increase the dose of propofol?thx u

GCS 6-7, not forming memories - so propofol is not needed (if still worried, give 1 mg midazolam, or some scopalamine). What is needed is good intubating conditions. Use Sux for that. Use LOTS of fentanyl or lidocaine as mentioned to blunt the intubating response. Fentanyl is completely reversible, sux wears off quickly.

Worse than any drug or intervention you are going to give/do to this patient - for his ICP - is hypoxia and hypercarbia. Get the tube in quick - that is the best you can do for his ICP and other issues.
 
I would be surprised if there is a fiberoptic, glidescope, or precedex where the OP is.
 
i have yet to see an airway that you couldn't get the view on the glidescope


Like Tom Selleck said in the old AT&T adds "You Will".

[YOUTUBE]2kfIFDX9kE4[/YOUTUBE]
 
I think we may be missing the boat here. A patient who is anticipated to be a difficult mask ventilation and difficult intubation should be intubated awake/spontaneously breathing. ICP be damned, although you can optimize this with generous topicalization and some light sedation (a little midaz vs precedex) if you need it, but airway trumps ICP in my opinion. As far as I know, there is no cause of increased ICP that is improved by hypoventilation/hypoxia/death. Plus this guy's ICP doesn't sound critical if he's still tachycardic. My plan would be to take a deep breath, premed with glyco, load with precedex prn, topicalize the s%^$ out of the airway using your cocktail of choice, and bang out awake FOBI with minimal hemodynamic/ICP compromise.

Not missing the point, please see post #4. Just moved on in the discussion as to, how to get optimum conditions when intubating a potentially difficult airway. As you are aware, there are some pts that can't be intubated awake either because of urgency, anxiety (i know there are ways around this one)or some other issue.

B-Bone, I have a question for you. I agree that awake is the way to go many times. But this is a non anesthesia trained person and as best I can tell not ICU or ER either. I have not seen anyone outside of anesthesia do a good awake intubation with the exception of a pulmonary trained ICU person. I have to assume the person here with the most airway experience might happen to be the local paramedic at this hour since their anesthesiologist is "sick" ( yeah right, does anyone believe this one?). So my question is, if this pt needs urgent intubation how should this guy proceed?
 
B-Bone, I have a question for you. I agree that awake is the way to go many times. But this is a non anesthesia trained person and as best I can tell not ICU or ER either. I have not seen anyone outside of anesthesia do a good awake intubation with the exception of a pulmonary trained ICU person. I have to assume the person here with the most airway experience might happen to be the local paramedic at this hour since their anesthesiologist is "sick" ( yeah right, does anyone believe this one?). So my question is, if this pt needs urgent intubation how should this guy proceed?

ideal situation: experienced anesthesiologist with appropriate equipment does the right thing. AFOBI with great topicalization.

Less ideal: someone with some (likely not enough) experience does the best he can with what he has. Sounds like what happened here.

This does start to beg the question of scope of practice and some serious systems problems where this person is practicing.

For example, at my hospital, I am in house at night but the OB doc is not (if there are no laboring pts). If a crashing parturient rolls in with a dying baby, am I going ot section her myself as the most experienced clinician in the hospital, or do I call the OB in to do it right? Now, I assisted on a few c-sections in med school and get the basic idea of how they're performed. Could I get a baby out of a lady? Yes. Would I kill one/both of them or cause some other irreparable harm? Probably. Would I do it in real life? No f%^$ing way.

The point is, if no one qualified is around to do a complicated procedure that requires skill and training, should any schmoe off the street give it a whirl?

Discuss.
 
:smack:Well now that you put it that way, I guess ketap should have done nothing.

Ketap, don't be offended. B-Bone and I are just having a little fun at your expense.
 
i had a patient who was predicted to be difficult for bag mask ventilation and laryngoscopic view (short neck, short TMD, large tongue, edentulous and no artificial teeth) ..the patient 65 years old, estimated weight 60 Kg, diagnosed as hemorrhagic stroke causing intracerebral edema (detected by CTscan)..this patient had a GCS of 6-7(still has gag reflex), so we wanted to intubate the patient..the vital signs was still quiet stable.
we intubated the patient with propofol 6o mg only (i didn't want to use the our only available muscle relaxant succynilcholin because i was afraid with its effect on ICP and the difficult airway).. after reaching the time to peak effect of propofol, i tried to intubate the patient, but the mouth was still very stiff in this patient and so, it was so hard for me to intubate this patient. i think i might have made mistakes in this patient and i need to evaluate myself so,i need to ask some questions to all of you...

1.actually, is it possible to proceed intubation without any drugs? when? and on what GCS will it be?
2. how can i manage the stiffness? should i increase the dose of propofol?thx u

Didn't know your training background. Not to sound condescending but know thy limitations. Many medically students suffer from "intubation envy" and I always have to remind them there are things far more important then the tube.

The truth is if his vitals are stable, do the basics first. Put him on oxygen non rebreathier. Sit him up (lowers ICP, decreases aspiration risk, and improves ventilation). Have an ambubag, LMA, scope and tube and emergency drugs next to him.

Try to figure out his NPO status. Get some iv reglan and zantac on board to decrease risk of aspiration. Now in the mean time get ENT/ER/general surgery/CC or any doc that has some experience with intubations. I mean the hospital can't be that rural.

Help now arrives, they can intubate. Now if they are planning on doing any procedure that anesthesiologist (or more likely independent practicing CRNA) better be on the way.

The reason I say this is because you could of caused a lot more harm then was needed.
1) You did not do a rapid sequence induction on a possible full stomach. Want to see the guy die quick, have him aspirate his spaghetti dinner.
2) The patient was stable, no respiratory distress. No immediate need to tube. 3) Iatrogenic induced hypoxia and hypercarbia with propofol push is probably the fastest way to kill this guy.
4) If there is still no one available, and the respiratory function deteriorates quickly, bag mask em. If thats not working, LMA them then bag em. Chances are very slim you won't be able to bag em (specially at 60 kg). All else fails, tube em.

Its the equivalent of me trying to put a chest tube in a tension PTX. I'll needle decompress but I'll get someone who know how to put in a chest tube. Now I did it as a medical student but if **** hits the fan and I have no support, I might just do it myself although my attempt will probably be meaningless. In all honesty I would probably just take a scalpel to their side intercostal space and leave it open.
 
:smack:Well now that you put it that way, I guess ketap should have done nothing.

Ketap, don't be offended. B-Bone and I are just having a little fun at your expense.

The example I gave about c-sections may be a bit extreme, but I think it illustrates the point that sometimes, if you don't know what you're doing, you shouldn't be doing it because you can cause more harm good. Sitting on your thumbs waiting for the appropriately trained provider to get there, especially in an urgent/emergent situation, can be difficult, but it might be the right thing to do. This particular situation is a good example. OP took a stable (from an hemodynamics/airway standpoint) patient, put them to sleep and caused hemodynamic disturbance (knowing they might be difficult to mask and/or intubate and had elevated ICP) when doing nothing and waiting for an anesthesiologist (wherever he/she was) to arrive might have worked out better. Granted, in this case, there appears (from what we know) to have been no adverse outcome, but there certainly could have: lost airway, herniation from elevated ICP, etc.

Another way to look at this situation is from a medicolegal risk standpoint. If you are not trained or credentialed to do something at a hospital, you would likely not be held liable for NOT doing it, if there is a bad outcome. We don't expect pathologists to deliver babies or neurologists to do trachs, etc. However, if you do step outside of your scope of practice and the situation goes south, you could be screwed. In the OP's case, the person likely on the hook for airway mgmt at the hospital is the anesthesiologist (or CRNA or ER doc or ICU guy or whoever is contracted to provide that service), and they should have been there. If the OP is the responsible person in the hospital, then nevermind. That hospital has bigger problems.
 
here comes my "old guy" rant about kids these days and their damned glidescopes/hula hoops/nintendos (even though I only graduated a year ago). Awake FOBI still very much has a place at the table, and I think this is being lost on the current generation of anesthesia residents who think they can put a tube in anybody with a glidescope/mcgrath/etc. If you never do awake airways, you never gain experience in the most crucial part: the topicalization. If your awake intubations are gruesome and painful for the patients, you're doing it wrong and you need more practice. If you can truly intubate anyone totally expediently with a glidescope and they never desat before you can get the tube in and never need to be masked while you readjust things/get equipment/get help, then more power to you, but the day you find out you can't, somebody dies.

Now I agree that I have decreased the number of AFOBI I do since the introduction of video laryngoscopes, but I would still definitely not put somebody to sleep if I didn't think I could ventilate them. What do you have to gain? Patient might not have to "suffer" through awake intubation, but they may have anoxic brain injury? Sounds like small upside with a huge potential downside. Of course, FOBI is not the only awake airway choice. At a conference I went to last winter, the airway jockeys described awake intubation through an intubating LMA as well as awake glide scope intubation and of course the classic awake DL (all with appropriate topicalization, of course), but the key word here was AWAKE.

👍👍👍

I'm a current resident and we get awesome airway training at my program. I'll do an awake at the drop of a hat, especially for ICU intubations. I know lots of people just don't do them- we have some attendings that didn't train in our program and will put people to sleep even with red flags waving all over the place. We have one guy who will put anyone to sleep because he trusts in the C-MAC that much. Not me.

I've seen the Glidescope fail multiple times. Either no view or a view that you can't get to without using a fiber as a driveable stylet. If you haven't seen the Glidescope fail, you haven't used it enough.

The awake is never fully going to go away. I feel like everyone should learn how to do it, and learn how to do it well. Blocks, topicalize, whatever you want. If you do it right and with appropriate sedation it shouldn't be that bad for the patient (or the rest of the staff in the OR!). I'm just glad I've been trained by some airway ninjas.

Ok, sorry. Getting off my airway soapbox now....
 
Another way to look at this situation is from a medicolegal risk standpoint. If you are not trained or credentialed to do something at a hospital, you would likely not be held liable for NOT doing it, if there is a bad outcome. We don't expect pathologists to deliver babies or neurologists to do trachs, etc. However, if you do step outside of your scope of practice and the situation goes south, you could be screwed. In the OP's case, the person likely on the hook for airway mgmt at the hospital is the anesthesiologist (or CRNA or ER doc or ICU guy or whoever is contracted to provide that service), and they should have been there. If the OP is the responsible person in the hospital, then nevermind. That hospital has bigger problems.

Well this is sort of a grey area as well. You probably won't be held liable for not doing something that you are not credentialed in but if things go bad under your nose and you did nothing, that may be a problem as well. Nobody would expect you to perform a cesarian if you are not a surgeon but to perform ACLS would be expected. Assuming someone like the OP would have ACLS certification if they are in this position in the first place.

Credentials are something that are not set in stone as well. If you find yourself in a position to perform a reasonable task which is in the pts best interest, credentials will usually be waived.
 
i had a patient who was predicted to be difficult for bag mask ventilation and laryngoscopic view (short neck, short TMD, large tongue, edentulous and no artificial teeth) ..the patient 65 years old, estimated weight 60 Kg, diagnosed as hemorrhagic stroke causing intracerebral edema (detected by CTscan)..this patient had a GCS of 6-7(still has gag reflex), so we wanted to intubate the patient..the vital signs was still quiet stable.
we intubated the patient with propofol 6o mg only (i didn't want to use the our only available muscle relaxant succynilcholin because i was afraid with its effect on ICP and the difficult airway).. after reaching the time to peak effect of propofol, i tried to intubate the patient, but the mouth was still very stiff in this patient and so, it was so hard for me to intubate this patient. i think i might have made mistakes in this patient and i need to evaluate myself so,i need to ask some questions to all of you...

1.actually, is it possible to proceed intubation without any drugs? when? and on what GCS will it be?
2. how can i manage the stiffness? should i increase the dose of propofol?thx u

Just my 2 cents from an EM perspective (hope you guys don't mind me chiming in)...already agree with most that has been said. I'm assuming this was a pt in your ED? You mentioned that you were a GP, so were you moonlighting in a rural ED somewhere?

My take is this...The dude has a hemorrhagic stroke with a decreasing GCS. He probably doesn't need to sit around down there in the ED for a prolonged period of time. Time is brain. If you spend too long getting his airway, great... but if he turns into a vegetable for lack of NSGY intervention, then your airway didn't really improve the outcome. I realize that failed airway def doesn't improve outcome either but the overall whole picture needs to be viewed here. He needs to get tubed, and fast, hyperventilated, bed 30 degrees, the whole lower ICP stuff, stabilized and either transported somewhere with NSGY available, or put straight in the ICU asap if you have NSGY in house. If you were in a rural ED, it sounds like the guy needs to get transported immediately. I understand your reticence in intubating, but you're in a bind in a situation like this... If you don't feel confident in your intubation skills, you need an anesthesiologist or another proficient airway person in house at all times while you're working the ED. Either that, or gain some additional airway training would be the easiest way to increase your confidence. Awake intubation takes longer, needs pt cooperation to some extent, risks aspiration, prolongs your laryngoscopy and is going to end up overly stimulating the physiologic reflexive surge in catecholamine release which will drive the ICP even higher. I'm a proponent of awake intubations, in the right condition. I don't personally consider this a right condition.

If you're going to intubate him, as has already been said, maximize your ability to do it successfully. The whole point to awake is so the pt will be able to breathe on his own. He's got a hemorrhagic stroke with a declining GCS. Chances are, his GCS is not going to improve and with a GCS of 6-7 the reality is that he's going to quickly reach a point where he can't protect his airway at all.

Physiologic reflex induced catech surge from prolonged laryngoscopy = increased ICP. SCH induced fasciculations = increased ICP (how much? I don't know...) With a 60kg guy, and no contraindications to Succ, I'd prob use your fastest acting and shortest duration RSI agents. Succ and etomidate with some fentanyl and lidocaine to mitigate some of the ICP issues. You want him paralyzed to increase your chances of success and you for sure don't want this guy vomiting halfway through your awake or merely sedated attempt and risk an aspiration.

Back up devices... What do you have? Glidescope, LMA, bougie, hell....combitube or king air device if you got desperate (I'm assuming you don't have fiberoptics or would feel comfortable doing a cric(not that it would be indicated in this case anyway)..). Anything to secure his airway and get him somewhere to get the bleeding inside of his head fixed. If he herniates from increased ICP 2/2 your intubation, he would have herniated soon anyway before he could have even made it anywhere for an intervention. Also, with a 60kg guy, I find it difficult to believe that an OPA/NPA with bagging until the short acting agents wear off would not be sufficient to ventilate him.

In short, I say maximize your chances of success with this guy and get him to a neurosurgeon once the airway is established and he's stabilized for transport.

Also, in retrospect... You intubated him with 60mg of propofol... In that case, you def could have done it easier with full muscle relaxation and not running the risk of aspiration. His reflex induced ICP from the intubation with prop alone I would say was def greater than if you had paralyzed him and given him an opioid analgesic with or without lidocaine during RSI.

Just my 2 cents.
 
Last edited:
hi,sorry for being so late to reply..i haven't got the chance to reply..thx for all the answers and opinion,guys..🙂 i really appreciate it...thx u for the spirit by Ketafol20..i really thankful for that🙂..but, actually i am not offended .i do think all of the opinion was great and needed to be concerned by me and my hospital..

the problem why i did the intubation procedure because i think with the GCS 6-7 ,there was an indication for immediate intubation,especially for a patient like this..and it is true, the only anesthesiologist we have was sick, he suffered malaria and was admitted to the hospital in the next day (he has recovered 3 days ago though) and i was the only one who was able to do the intubation (in my country, GP also handle the ED)..i have some experiences in intubating some patients, but not with a predicted difficult airway..so, i think i was quiet confuse not being able to do the recommended approach founded in the book about what we have to do in a patient like this (do some awake) because i am not trained to do awake intubation to this patient and i don't think that in this condition,it was appropriate( i agree with u,Groove).. that's why i need all of the opinion from you guys..

If you're going to intubate him, as has already been said, maximize your ability to do it successfully. The whole point to awake is so the pt will be able to breathe on his own. He's got a hemorrhagic stroke with a declining GCS. Chances are, his GCS is not going to improve and with a GCS of 6-7 the reality is that he's going to quickly reach a point where he can't protect his airway at all.
i didn't realize about this before, if the GCS getting lower,than the awake approach will have no benefit either..thx u,Groove 🙂

Ketafol20 and Groove: so, do you mean that by using the lidocaine or fentanyl, the ICP effect of fasciculation from the Succs will be less?

would feel comfortable doing a cric(not that it would be indicated in this case anyway)..
Groove: why won't the cricoid pressure indicated for this patient?


If he herniates from increased ICP 2/2 your intubation, he would have herniated soon anyway before he could have even made it anywhere for an intervention..Also, with a 60kg guy, I find it difficult to believe that an OPA/NPA with bagging until the short acting agents wear off would not be sufficient to ventilate him.
Groove: i don't really understand what you have said in the first sentence,..can you please explain it to me? and why can you be quiet sure that the OPA with bagging will be sufficient to ventilate him until the agent wear off ,is it based on his weight? how can?thx 🙂

regards, Jeansen
 
Last edited:
hi,sorry for being so late to reply..i haven't got the chance to reply..thx for all the answers and opinion,guys..🙂 i really appreciate it...thx u for the spirit by Ketafol20..i really thankful for that🙂..but, actually i am not offended .i do think all of the opinion was great and needed to be concerned by me and my hospital..

the problem why i did the intubation procedure because i think with the GCS 6-7 ,there was an indication for immediate intubation,especially for a patient like this..and it is true, the only anesthesiologist we have was sick, he suffered malaria and was admitted to the hospital in the next day (he has recovered 3 days ago though) and i was the only one who was able to do the intubation (in my country, GP also handle the ED)..i have some experiences in intubating some patients, but not with a predicted difficult airway..so, i think i was quiet confuse not being able to do the recommended approach founded in the book about what we have to do in a patient like this (do some awake) because i am not trained to do awake intubation to this patient and i don't think that in this condition,it was appropriate( i agree with u,Groove).. that's why i need all of the opinion from you guys..


i didn't realize about this before, if the GCS getting lower,than the awake approach will have no benefit either..thx u,Groove 🙂

Ketafol20 and Groove: so, do you mean that by using the lidocaine or fentanyl, the ICP effect of fasciculation from the Succs will be less?


Groove: why won't the cricoid pressure indicated for this patient?



Groove: i don't really understand what you have said in the first sentence,..can you please explain it to me? and why can you be quiet sure that the OPA with bagging will be sufficient to ventilate him until the agent wear off ,is it based on his weight? how can?thx 🙂

regards, Jeansen

Perhaps Groove's point is this -

The worst thing for this guy is hypoxia and hypercarbia. The effects on ICP from this FAR OUTWEIGH any small effect that your sux, or intubation will do. In a 60kg person, with an oral or nasal airway, he should be easily mask ventilatable (is that a word?) - which means you can make sure he isn't hypoxic, and you can even hyperventilate him some (not a ton).

And my point before is this guy isn't remembering anything - so you certainly can us an amnestic if you want, but it isn't needed, depending on other things going on. What probably is needed is something to blunt the sympathetic response to your intubation (ie fentanyl - fully reversible).
 
Yep, agree with Epi, hope that all made sense.

As for "cric", I was referring to emergent surgical crycothyroidotomy, not cricoid pressure. It doesn't sound like this guy needed one though. 😉 Not one of those procedures that you want to brag about as it generally carries the ultimate stamp of failure at establishing an optimal airway. Sometimes indicated, but rare... I've only done 2. Generally, like to keep your numbers low on that one.
 
epidural man and groove :hi, i understand it quiet well right now. but still quiet confuse and need to ask 2 things to be understand :

1. if we want to use the succs,the fentanyl or lidocaine or any defasciculating agent will help decrease the icp effect..
2. i am very sorry if i am quiet an idiot ,but i still don't really understand how can you correlate the weight and the ventilateable condition?
is it from the Tidal Volume and the bag capacity?
thx u very much..🙂
 
Top