Overall, what are your thoughts?
Good lecture. I agree with essentially everything he presented.
He doesn't seem to like etomidate ( more for dosing reasons than adrenal supp), do you share the same opinion?
I do not use much etomidate in septic shock patients. I favor greatly reduced doses of propofol, or ketamine if it's within arm's reach. The whole adrenal suppression thing probably doesn't matter, but I don't see a good reason to use etomidate in those cases.
I will say that in the last year, during a trauma sabbatical of sorts, I used a ton of etomidate in hypovolemic shock patients, for reasons mostly related to institutional inertia and availability in the trauma bays, and it was Just Fine.
He is a proponent of ketamine in this podcast.
Does anybody else routinely use ketamine for the shocked pt?
Is what he says regarding the dosing and the myocardial depression associated w/ketamine true?
I love ketamine.
I don't know if the exacerbated hypotension you will see using ketamine as an induction agent for very hypovolemic or septic patients is due to direct myocardial depression (doubt it) or a result of a reduction in circulating catecholamines from the brain going from freaked-out to asleep (probably), but it absolutely does happen. Any and every induction agent will worsen hypotension in a patient living at the edge of his physiologic reserve.
It was nice to hear him state unequivically that ketamine is OK in head injury patients who aren't in Cushing response territory (ie it's OK for patients who are hypo- or normo-tensive). I had this conversation with our neurosurgeon and the rest of my department over in traumaland but they were dubious, and I didn't care enough to press the issue. But ketamine is OK for head injuries, provided you're sane about keeping the patient's hemodynamics reasonable.
Concerning the specific case of hypovolemic shock, my $.02, having recently done a lot of trauma in a setting where anesthesia received and managed patients in the ER trauma bay, and many patients were deep into hypovolemic shock from blood loss -
It doesn't matter one little bit what induction agent you use (or even how you use it most of the time!), because the best course of action is almost always to wait to induce/intubate until after the Belmont has run in a bunch of blood and resuscitated the patient.
There's rarely a need to secure the airway immediately, the only real exceptions being combative/dangerous patients and those with oxygenation/ventilation problems. People are excitable and everyone's in a hurry, but we don't have to be. If bleeding is controlled, there's no rush. If bleeding is uncontrolled (ie chest/abd/pelvis), there's still no rush to
intubate, and what you probably want to do is get to the OR, get on the table, get the patient prepped and the surgeon ready to cut, then everyone can rush to intubate/operate at the same time.
We routinely got adult patients with HR of 150+ and systolic BPs under 80 with 1-4 tourniquets in place, and/or ongoing internal bleeding from chest/abd/pelvic trauma. Even so, we were always able to get a line and resuscitate the patient prior to induction. 4-6 units of red cells and 4-6 of FFP through a Belmont and subclavian cordis made choice of induction agent almost moot. We sometimes had to tell people to just relax and WAIT in the trauma bay for a few minutes while the blood went in.
We usually used propofol or normal doses of etomidate, after resuscitation. For patients who were still unstable despite aggressive transfusion, ketamine ... or scopalamine.
Other good points from the podcast:
- the vasopressor to have in your pocket, diluted and ready to push, is epinephrine not phenylephrine
- be careful with vent settings after intubation