- Joined
- Dec 17, 2006
- Messages
- 100
- Reaction score
- 0
I wonder about the title that they have, because they have PHD so are they doctor or not?!!
I wonder about the title that they have, because they have PHD so are they doctor or not?!!
First off, a pharmacist does not have a PhD, they have a PharmD. A PhD (Doctor of Philosophy) is research intensive, and recognizes individuals who discover something novel.
All persons who earn a doctoral degree (PhD, M.D., PharmD, J.D., OptD, D.D.S., etc.) rightfully and legally earn the title of "Doctor." However, due to tradition, a pharmacist, much less a lawyer, doesn't go by the title of Dr. ____ _____ in public, and wouldn't expect a client or patient to call them such. This is to prevent confusion, especially in the medical field.
However, if your a pharmacist, I believe you should get the recognition of your academic and professional achievement. Whether it be in a form being filled out, a business card, your signature, a publication, etc. I can't really think of something relevant.
To sum it up, a pharmacist has the title of doctor, just like a professor has the title of doctor. However, they are not "doctors" like your medical doctors are.
When I c the pharmacist on my campus, I usually call him Dr. XXX. But actually I'm sure whether I should just call him Mr. XXX instead...😕
My academic degree is a PharmD - Doctor of Pharmacy.
Some people call me Dr, some people call me "the pharmacist", some people call em sdn.....some people even call me Mom😀 - I answer to all of them!
Can we call you mom? 😱 🙄 😀
I guess I prefer SDN better.
Just when I was ready to hide under a table with my thumb in my mouth, I was surprised at how well this thread has gone so far. Sure it's the 1,000,000,008th time this topic has been brought up on SDN, but no one has made THEE A-hole comment to set it off yet. 😀 I think this board is changing for the better.
And when I work (no matter what setting), I expect to be called by my 1st name. But as with interviewers and professors, it's safer to call them Doctor BLAH so you won't accidentally offend them.
When I c the pharmacist on my campus, I usually call him Dr. XXX. But actually I'm sure whether I should just call him Mr. XXX instead...😕
Anybody that have a PhD, EdD, PharmD,JD, MD, DO are supposed to be called Doctor. They earned a doctorate in their subject so they are doctors.
We commonly called Physicians, Doctors and that is not wrond but in the way we use it, it is wrong,
Pharmacists are doctors in more than one sense of the word. The word doctor usually means "someone who practices medicine" and "someone who has earned a doctorate degree" (PharmD.). Both apply to the pharmacist. I think that in the field (meaning clinics, hospitals, pharmacy stores, etc...) people will call pharmacists doctor.
That is the most ******ed thing I have ever heard. We call physicians doctors.......in the way we use it, its wrong. WTF!! When you ask a child what their dream is, and they say they want to become a doctor.....do you think they meant a PhamD....No freakin way. I have never heard anybody call of pharmacist a doctor, and it should stay that way. You PharmD people are trying so hard to parallel your education and training to that of a MD or DO, but its never going to happen.....just be happy with what you have already.
That is the most ******ed thing I have ever heard. We call physicians doctors.......in the way we use it, its wrong. WTF!! When you ask a child what their dream is, and they say they want to become a doctor.....do you think they meant a PhamD....No freakin way. I have never heard anybody call of pharmacist a doctor, and it should stay that way. You PharmD people are trying so hard to parallel your education and training to that of a MD or DO, but its never going to happen.....just be happy with what you have already.
Does this qualify as "THEE comment"?
That is the most ******ed thing I have ever heard. We call physicians doctors.......in the way we use it, its wrong. WTF!! When you ask a child what their dream is, and they say they want to become a doctor.....do you think they meant a PhamD....No freakin way. I have never heard anybody call of pharmacist a doctor, and it should stay that way. You PharmD people are trying so hard to parallel your education and training to that of a MD or DO, but its never going to happen.....just be happy with what you have already.
Does this qualify as "THEE comment"?
OH NO! It started! *hides under table*
The two people who call me mom want money!
You can call me sdn - just don't ask for money😛 .
*Joins under table to watch the fight develop*
Got any popcorn?![]()
Nuts🙁 , cuz I've got this pharmacy school thing coming up and I was really needing some.![]()
Yes, it appears that kovamies has a third copy of chromosome 21 as well as excessive levels of testosterone.
Yup, I have some huge balls too. That extra surge of testosterone gives me the edge I need.
Bottom line: Dont be haters just cause you all know I am right. If anybody calls you Dr., its because they also have your same, skewed view about whether PharmD's should be called Dr. I dont have any problem with being a PharmD, but quit whining about being equals with other health practitioners......I would classify pharmacists along with chiropractors; only difference is, Pharmacists actually know what they are doing.
Yup, I have some huge balls too. That extra surge of testosterone gives me the edge I need.
Bottom line: Dont be haters just cause you all know I am right. If anybody calls you Dr., its because they also have your same, skewed view about whether PharmD's should be called Dr. I dont have any problem with being a PharmD, but quit whining about being equals with other health practitioners......I would classify pharmacists along with chiropractors; only difference is, Pharmacists actually know what they are doing.
If someone earns a doctrate they have every right to be called Dr whether they are an MD, PhD, or PharmD. Your argument is what is ******ed.
At the hospital as I can see so far, there are MD/DO who are really stupid (!!) (sorry for the word...) about drugs and drugs interactions. They have to ask the clinical pharmacist on how to combine drug therapy and what they should do if their "favorites" do not work. Without these clinical Doctor of Pharmacy's, those MD/DO guys are completely cripples! Especially if you are talking to PharmD that has BCPS--trust me, they know A LOT about drugs and pharmacotherapy. Besides like someone has said, each has his/her own jobs, MD/DO diagnose and PharmD compound and dispense drugs. THey work side-by-side and are mutually exclusive for the patients. I personally would like that they make people call PharmD "Doctor" in the future to honor their educational excellence and professional knowledge. FIY: If you look at the curriculum in med school and pharm school, probably you'll see that pharmacists get more training in drugs than physicians do...
Yup, I have some huge balls too. That extra surge of testosterone gives me the edge I need.
Bottom line: Dont be haters just cause you all know I am right. If anybody calls you Dr., its because they also have your same, skewed view about whether PharmD's should be called Dr. I dont have any problem with being a PharmD, but quit whining about being equals with other health practitioners......I would classify pharmacists along with chiropractors; only difference is, Pharmacists actually know what they are doing.
That is the most ******ed thing I have ever heard. We call physicians doctors.......in the way we use it, its wrong. WTF!! When you ask a child what their dream is, and they say they want to become a doctor.....do you think they meant a PhamD....No freakin way. I have never heard anybody call of pharmacist a doctor, and it should stay that way. You PharmD people are trying so hard to parallel your education and training to that of a MD or DO, but its never going to happen.....just be happy with what you have already.
Again, this issue has been brought up in 10000000000000000000 posts. Are we doctors? Well, yeah. We are doctors of pharmacy. But we are not doctor of medicine and never will be. That's just the fact. Can we refer ourselves as Dr.? Hell yeah, nobody will be able to sue me(and even if they do, they'll lose for good) if I introduce myself CLEARLY, "Hi, this is Dr.XXX, your clinical pharmacist". My name badge will say it all, "XXXX, Pharm.D/Pharmacist". But i rarely see pharmacists introduce themselves as such Dr. I, personally, won't do that. There is no point to confuse the patients.
There are a lot of reasons why pharmacists aren't yet recognized by the fellow professionals and public and referred as Dr. Title:
1. Historically, pharmacists are known for the main function: Distribution. The Pharm.D programs evolved not too long ago (20 yrs or so?...correct me if i am wrong). And even way back then, not many people go for Pharm.D when your main job is dispensing and checking.
2. Public and even fellow professionals aren't aware of the Pharm.D degree. I work at retail setting right now as an intern and round at my clinical rotations. At times, I asked people from retail settings....Not many know what the heck the Pharm.D is. They thought we just obtain a Bachelor Degree only in order to work as a pharmacist. Even some nurses (especially LVN nurses) don't have a clue what Pharm.D is.
3. In the public , they still imagine a pharmacist is someone dispensing medications only and they think it's a simple task that ANYONE can grab that concept.
4. At small hospitals, clinical role of a pharmacist isn't emphasized much. Sure, they have protocols and everything but people still don't understand how important a pharmacist would benefit the hospital and can reduce the cost of medications SIGNIFICANTLY. Nurses think that dosing TPNs and Vancomycin/AMG are easy tasks (Yeah, i talked to one nurse and she said that and i have to educate her about the whole deal).
5. What happens in the future? Well, nothing if the pharmacy associations are still weak. Yes, we aren't very strong because everyone was too busy making moneyLook at AMA and NSNA. They are really strong. Why? I don't know either. But one thing for sure: They're more powerful than us. In a hospital, how many CEOs are pharmacist-background? I haven't seen one, yet. But I do see nurses, and of course MDs are always at top.
Another thing is we have to be more involved in clinical activities. More protocols and ideas should be initiated. It doesn't matter how smart you are, the top people at a hospital always look at HOW MUCH YOU CAN SAVE for them. It all boils down to MONEY and BUSINESS. Once you can prove one Pharm.D is more efficient/accurate than two RNs....then yeah, we'll get more respect.
Anyway, at the end, I do believe our career would be changing a lot in 5,10, and 20 yrs. ANd our degrees will gain more respect from others because people start to realize how long it takes to become a pharmacist. Take a look at dentistry. Nobody in dentistry has a bachelor degree. You have to be a DDS (Doctor of Dental Surgeon) to practice dentistry. Public are aware of that. Just a very small suggestion, the retail settings should put something like Bob Clayton, Pharm.D up all the wall right at the pickup window so people would see that. Rather than just Bob Clayton, RPh. It's shallow but that's the only way we will be recognized for what we earn.
Well, ok, this poster may be a bit..."passionate", but he is right. In the real world, not just pre-this or pre-that students posting opinions, most hospitals actually have rules PROHIBITING anyone but a physician be referred to as "Doctor". This was re-affirmed recently when some ND(Doctor of Nursing) midlevel at my hospital was called in by the hospital administration to stop referring to herself as "Dr. ---". The reason is simple, if a pt were to have an adverse event, you can be darn sure the plaintiffs lawyer would have a field day about how the "Doctor" was in fact not a "Doctor" as a layman would assume in a clinical setting. This in fact is misrepresentation and not just the practitioner, but the hospital itself, would not have a leg to stand on. This is a true-life example to answer the OP's question. If midlevels with doctorate training, who actually can dx and tx pts, is PROHIBITED from refering to themselves as "Drs", you can be darn sure the pharmacists are also prohibited.
At the hospital as I can see so far, there are MD/DO who are really stupid (!!) (sorry for the word...) about drugs and drugs interactions. They have to ask the clinical pharmacist on how to combine drug therapy and what they should do if their "favorites" do not work. Without these clinical Doctor of Pharmacy's, those MD/DO guys are completely cripples! Especially if you are talking to PharmD that has BCPS--trust me, they know A LOT about drugs and pharmacotherapy. Besides like someone has said, each has his/her own jobs, MD/DO diagnose and PharmD compound and dispense drugs. THey work side-by-side and are mutually exclusive for the patients. I personally would like that they make people call PharmD "Doctor" in the future to honor their educational excellence and professional knowledge. FIY: If you look at the curriculum in med school and pharm school, probably you'll see that pharmacists get more training in drugs than physicians do...
I have to disagree. The VA hospital where I work, everyone with a doctrate degree (PhD, PharmD, MD) are referred to as Dr. The other hospital, a teaching hospital, is the same. Everyone with a doctorate is referred to as Dr. One the same note, something of even more concern to me happens here. We have an MD that graduated from a medical school in Mexico. He is not licensed to practice medicine in the US. However, he signs everything John Doe MD and also refers to himself as Dr. John Doe. I think that's even more misleading than anything. At least the PharmDs are licensed in the US to do their job. This guy isn't even licensed and is only hired to do recruiting but signs MD behind his name when he sends out reminder letters to patients that he recruits.
I really have a hard time understanding why some people have such an issue with Dr. It's just merely a way of recognizing someone for completing their education. It's not like they are referring to PharmDs as physicians or anything like that.
Obviously this is just BS. I AM on the credentialing committee of my hospital (every hospital has one) whose only purpose is to review and confirm and verify the credentials of applicants to the hospital's Medical Staff. This is so vitally important b/c the hospitals have liability if it allows sub-standard physicians on its staff. If you can so blatantly lie about this (thought no one would know😕 😕 ), then the rest of your post holds no credibillity. I stand by the fact that I am on staff at 3 local hospitals, and b/c of liability issues, only physicians are referred to as doctors.Now I dont believe that! You honestly think a hospital would hire a physician who prescribed under a false name....if this is what you were implying. You seem to be diggin for something to lash back at FamilyMD.
Yup, I have some huge balls too. That extra surge of testosterone gives me the edge I need.
Bottom line: Dont be haters just cause you all know I am right. If anybody calls you Dr., its because they also have your same, skewed view about whether PharmD's should be called Dr. I dont have any problem with being a PharmD, but quit whining about being equals with other health practitioners......I would classify pharmacists along with chiropractors; only difference is, Pharmacists actually know what they are doing.
Obviously this is just BS. I AM on the credentialing committee of my hospital (every hospital has one) whose only purpose is to review and confirm and verify the credentials of applicants to the hospital's Medical Staff. This is so vitally important b/c the hospitals have liability if it allows sub-standard physicians on its staff. If you can so blatantly lie about this (thought no one would know😕 😕 ), then the rest of your post holds no credibillity. I stand by the fact that I am on staff at 3 local hospitals, and b/c of liability issues, only physicians are referred to as doctors.
Look pharm people, the issue is not your Academic title, the issue is the layman's, that's "patients" to the dense folks, perception. Misrepresentation is a slam-dunk in malpractice suits. Honestly, as one of my attending once said, if you want to be captain go to captain school.
Well, ok, this poster may be a bit..."passionate", but he is right. In the real world, not just pre-this or pre-that students posting opinions, most hospitals actually have rules PROHIBITING anyone but a physician be referred to as "Doctor". This was re-affirmed recently when some ND(Doctor of Nursing) midlevel at my hospital was called in by the hospital administration to stop referring to herself as "Dr. ---". The reason is simple, if a pt were to have an adverse event, you can be darn sure the plaintiffs lawyer would have a field day about how the "Doctor" was in fact not a "Doctor" as a layman would assume in a clinical setting. This in fact is misrepresentation and not just the practitioner, but the hospital itself, would not have a leg to stand on. This is a true-life example to answer the OP's question. If midlevels with doctorate training, who actually can dx and tx pts, is PROHIBITED from refering to themselves as "Drs", you can be darn sure the pharmacists are also prohibited.