Most people seem to support the mantra of majoring in what you're interested in, as long as you finish med school prerequisites. On the flip side, what if majoring in what you like leaves almost no room for prerequisites (only leaving time for the bare minimum that most med schools require and skipping out on things like English and Calc, which some don't require)? Is it still worth it to major in what you "like"?
Most med schools encourage taking upper-level, non-required courses in preparation for medical school. As the same time, they encourage majoring in whatever floats your boat and "distinguishing yourself in your area of study." To me, that sounds like you should choose a major in your interest area and devote time to taking the prescribed course of study for that subject (as outlined by major requirements) while doing things like research/internships in that area. No problem, except what if being prepared for medical school (by med schools' own definitions) and exploring my interest areas are at odds? Which wins out?
Due to my situation (late-bloomer pre-med), I can either:
1) major in what I'm interested in (psych or philosophy) with BARELY enough time/space to finish minimum pre-med courses and no time for those "recommended" pre-med courses
-or-
2) major in a BIO major (not my end-all, be-all interest), while having a decent amount of elective space to take whatever I want (psych and philosophy).
Is it fine to be a BIO major for the flexibility and choose not to apply myself in the area I am most directly interested in?
How important are those "recommended" courses that med schools list?
Which is MORE ancillary to an application: taking every prerequisite that a wide array of med schools require and some "recommended" courses, or, "distinguishing yourself in your area of study"
Most med schools encourage taking upper-level, non-required courses in preparation for medical school. As the same time, they encourage majoring in whatever floats your boat and "distinguishing yourself in your area of study." To me, that sounds like you should choose a major in your interest area and devote time to taking the prescribed course of study for that subject (as outlined by major requirements) while doing things like research/internships in that area. No problem, except what if being prepared for medical school (by med schools' own definitions) and exploring my interest areas are at odds? Which wins out?
Due to my situation (late-bloomer pre-med), I can either:
1) major in what I'm interested in (psych or philosophy) with BARELY enough time/space to finish minimum pre-med courses and no time for those "recommended" pre-med courses
-or-
2) major in a BIO major (not my end-all, be-all interest), while having a decent amount of elective space to take whatever I want (psych and philosophy).
Is it fine to be a BIO major for the flexibility and choose not to apply myself in the area I am most directly interested in?
How important are those "recommended" courses that med schools list?
Which is MORE ancillary to an application: taking every prerequisite that a wide array of med schools require and some "recommended" courses, or, "distinguishing yourself in your area of study"