Ok, so obviously opt school is not easy for the average Joe off the street. But here's the premise of my question: When I was in undergrad, I considered going to either MD or OD. I studied hard and got the grades to go to either...specifically, I went to class, took good notes in lecture, and also read the textbook pretty thoroughly for most science classes, or at least the pretty detailed study guide that we were given for the class. Back then I was leaning toward MD and took some quick looks at the MCAT and felt that the difficulty of the material tested was about at the level that I was being tested in my classes. However, I am now leaning more toward OD (after having been out of school for a few yrs because I had to work for various reasons), and I have recently taken a look at the OAT, and have been pleasantly surprised by how easy the material tested seems to be compared to the MCAT and compared to the depth that I needed to know in undergrad to do well in my classes. The OAT seems to just test a basic understanding of the concepts...there's not a lot of depth, tricks, etc. to throw you off. I feel like it tests at the level I would have gotten just by going to class and taking good lecture notes in undergrad, and not having to do a lot of textbook reading for homework.
And so I wonder if this transfers to opt school as well...even though you take many science classes in opt school, is the depth at which you are tested on these classes not so intense, to the point where most of what you need to know you will get just by going to class and taking good notes, without having to do lots of textbook reading at home? I ask because reading science textbooks at home was the most miserable part of undergrad...it would have been much easier and more fun if it was like high school, where most/all the info was taught in class and you really just needed to understand that material. Going to opt school now as an older student worries me a little, as I dread being cooped up in my room non-stop for 2 yrs reading science textbooks, but if it's more laid back then that, and really just a matter of reviewing your class/lecture notes, and otherwise having a good amount of free-time after class instead on non-stop studying, it seems much more palatable.
I hope my question is clear...stated another way: Is the depth of understanding of undergrad science classes required to do well on the OAT similar to the depth of understanding of opt school science classes required to do well in opt school?
And so I wonder if this transfers to opt school as well...even though you take many science classes in opt school, is the depth at which you are tested on these classes not so intense, to the point where most of what you need to know you will get just by going to class and taking good notes, without having to do lots of textbook reading at home? I ask because reading science textbooks at home was the most miserable part of undergrad...it would have been much easier and more fun if it was like high school, where most/all the info was taught in class and you really just needed to understand that material. Going to opt school now as an older student worries me a little, as I dread being cooped up in my room non-stop for 2 yrs reading science textbooks, but if it's more laid back then that, and really just a matter of reviewing your class/lecture notes, and otherwise having a good amount of free-time after class instead on non-stop studying, it seems much more palatable.
I hope my question is clear...stated another way: Is the depth of understanding of undergrad science classes required to do well on the OAT similar to the depth of understanding of opt school science classes required to do well in opt school?