Is this a nice watch to wear to my interviews?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
The looks a little... busy. You're going on an interview not coordinating a shuttle launch with the thing.

This is more of the understated style I'd aim for:
8c2e8_Bulova__Mens_Watches_41odWC6jWiL.jpg


anyways... I really don't think the watch is a make-or-break-it item... doubt it will even be noticed.

Lots of people go watch-less these days and just use their cellphones anyways.
::shrug::
 
The looks a little... busy. You're going on an interview not coordinating a shuttle launch with the thing.

This is more of the understated style I'd aim for:
8c2e8_Bulova__Mens_Watches_41odWC6jWiL.jpg


anyways... I really don't think the watch is a make-or-break-it item... doubt it will even be noticed.

Lots of people go watch-less these days and just use their cellphones anyways.
::shrug::

I'd have to disagree. Surely the OP will never be a good doctor if he's considering wearing that watch, and should seriously consider withdrawing his application.
 
The watch stinks. Everyone will see it and hate you. And you will never get in anywhere.

Plus I wouldn't go to a school where you made a nice impression based on the watch you wore. Wear it because it makes you feel confident. Otherwise it won't matter.


P.S. There is too much crap written on the face. I like beandip's watch.
 
Last edited:
Not a fan of the one you posted. I agree with BeanDip, the simpler watches are much more stylish and classy

parmigiani-tonda-1950-wrist.jpg
 
Alright do you guys have any good suggestions particularly from citizen?
 
Alright do you guys have any good suggestions particularly from citizen?

Depends on your budget and goal. Do you wear a watch regularly? Do you want an everyday watch that will pass on an interview or are you buying specifically for an interview?

You want a simple, clean face with either a thin leather or a metal band. I wouldn't go with one that has more than one feature beyond time and date.

For Citizen, if you're only wearing it for the interview, I would go for something like:
http://www.amazon.com/Citizen-BM824...0DER&s=watches&ie=UTF8&qid=1338690225&sr=1-14

If it's going to be your everyday watch, I would get something like and switch out the band for something more formal:
http://www.amazon.com/Citizen-BM818...X0DER&s=watches&ie=UTF8&qid=1338690225&sr=1-2

For a non-Citizen option:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0...=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B001E6SDQ2
 
I actually plan on wearing it after the interviews as well, not just for it alone.Thx for your suggestions
 
You guys didn't hear? The watch You wear to interview predetermines where you can match later. Super srs important
 
I actually plan on wearing it after the interviews as well, not just for it alone.Thx for your suggestions

I seriously thought you were going to throw it out after interviews. Or reflect sunlight off of it and blind people.

Keeping it after interviews is smart thinking. I guess thats why you'll be an md someday. 👍
 
I hate that giant watches have become trendy. Not putting a brick on my wrist, thanks

For Citizen, if you're only wearing it for the interview, I would go for something like:
http://www.amazon.com/Citizen-BM8240...690225&sr=1-14

👍👍 Was gifted this watch in gold, but still want to pick silver up. Perfect watch would probably be the tudor double date. I've been wandering streets casing people getting out of nice cars, but have yet to see one on a rest to steal 🙁
 
As I stated on the men's interview clothing thread, you should not wear a watch with a metal band with a suit. Wear a watch with a leather band and match the leather to your belt/shoes.

Here are examples of appropriate styles of watches for interviews.

IWC Portuguese

iwcportuguesechronograp.jpg


IWC Portofino

tumblr_lfsadq0c091qz56mjo1_500.jpg


IWC Pilot Watch Chrono

5.jpg


Citizen Eco-drive

http://www.calibrewatches.net/media...6c9b591970f7c2390a6f11c2b1/a/u/au1040-08e.jpg

This may be sound fashion advice but.....

I wore something similar to this
http://www.bestwatchessaving.com/images_products/Citizen-BM6560-54H-Eco-Drive-Titanium-Watch.jpg

Why? Because it is the only watch I have and getting another to satisfy the fashion police is simply silly. I got in to Med school just fine.

When it comes to what to wear id say stick to one rule. Do NOT stand out. Do not wear something flashy or overstated. You want to look professional and you don't want to give the interviewers the impression that you are vain.
 
Check out Swiss army watches too. They have very nice watches that look a lot more expensive then they are and they are durable too. Plus they arent that expensive.
 
If you plan on continuing to wear it:

1) Get something with a second hand, so you can use it while taking vitals

2) Stay away from flashy/big. You want people to think you look nice/professional, but not to notice anything specifically about your appearance.

Also, yes, please get a watch. Please don't rely on your cell phone, because you absolutely do not want to pull it out of your pocket in front of an interviewer or patient or attending. Sure, you're checking the time.... But they might think you're checking your text messages as well. Watches are much more subtle.
 
Leather is more formal than metal but metal is still acceptable and makes much more sense for someone not buying a watch specifically for formal wear. Interviews are formal, but they're not black tie events. It would be like wearing wingtips instead of oxfords: slightly less formal and maybe a pet peeve for an overly-dedicated sartorialist but nothing anyone at an interview will care about.

Avoiding the 45mm hockey puck watches, anything digital, and anything you need to read an instruction manual to use are far more important...
 
The first watch you posted.... is beyond my ability to comprehend. What the heck is all that stuff?
 
The first watch you posted.... is beyond my ability to comprehend. What the heck is all that stuff?

It's a set of mechanical calculators for aviation applications. Kind of like a physician with a watch to calculate FENA, BMI, and QTc interval. More gadgety than anything since you'd probably just whip out the iPhone and do it there...
 
Another consideration between leather and metal bands is sweat. I had a great black leather watch that is simply rank because of the heat around here.

Metal bands (provided the watch is water resistant enough) can be washed.
 
Another consideration between leather and metal bands is sweat. I had a great black leather watch that is simply rank because of the heat around here.

Metal bands (provided the watch is water resistant enough) can be washed.

Yeah, did you know some of the high end Rolex watches are so non water resistant that they come with warnings about sweat? Not for the.band, for the mechanical bits. totally worth 20k 🙄
 
Leather is more formal than metal but metal is still acceptable and makes much more sense for someone not buying a watch specifically for formal wear. Interviews are formal, but they're not black tie events. It would be like wearing wingtips instead of oxfords: slightly less formal and maybe a pet peeve for an overly-dedicated sartorialist but nothing anyone at an interview will care about.

Avoiding the 45mm hockey puck watches, anything digital, and anything you need to read an instruction manual to use are far more important...

Watches, leather or otherwise, aren't formalwear. They're businesswear. A watch should never be worn with a tux; true formalwear is for a social occasion, you shouldn't be concerned what time it is. Wearing a watch with a metal band with a suit is like wearing loafers with a suit for an interview; people do it, but that doesn't mean it isn't wrong. You can buy a watch with a leather band (such as a seiko) for $50.
 
I didn't wear a watch to my interview. It didn't even occur to me but you guys are talking like it's expected.
 
I didn't wear a watch to my interview. It didn't even occur to me but you guys are talking like it's expected.

It's not required to wear a watch, but wearing one that isn't appropriate could potentially hurt you.
 
Yeah, did you know some of the high end Rolex watches are so non water resistant that they come with warnings about sweat? Not for the.band, for the mechanical bits. totally worth 20k 🙄

Uh no. Most rolexes use ETA level movements, they're not any different than the vast majority of European watches on the market. Rolexes are known for ornamental value and case design, not the complexity or quality of the movements.
 
Wow this post is way too long. Not a single person will notice your watch. I pay attention to minor details like clothing and accessories, but I've never let it be a factor when writing up interviewees.

Just focus on what you will SAY. No one cares what watch you have. Buy a watch then makes you happy and looks professional.
 
Watches, leather or otherwise, aren't formalwear. They're businesswear. A watch should never be worn with a tux; true formalwear is for a social occasion, you shouldn't be concerned what time it is. Wearing a watch with a metal band with a suit is like wearing loafers with a suit for an interview; people do it, but that doesn't mean it isn't wrong. You can buy a watch with a leather band (such as a seiko) for $50.

I didn't say it was formal wear. I said it was more formal. And if we're going to argue about antiquated rules of dress then a pocket watch is appropriate in a formal occasion. The rest of society has long since left behind the notion that a conservative metal watch with a suit is an issue for anyone but fashion snobs...
 
I didn't say it was formal wear. I said it was more formal. And if we're going to argue about antiquated rules of dress then a pocket watch is appropriate in a formal occasion. The rest of society has long since left behind the notion that a conservative metal watch with a suit is an issue for anyone but fashion snobs...

I don't consider it an antiquated rule of dress by any means, and if I and others feel that way it's far more likely an older attending or PhD who grew up in an era where such things mattered more would take exception.
 
The looks a little... busy. You're going on an interview not coordinating a shuttle launch with the thing.

This is more of the understated style I'd aim for:
8c2e8_Bulova__Mens_Watches_41odWC6jWiL.jpg


anyways... I really don't think the watch is a make-or-break-it item... doubt it will even be noticed.

Lots of people go watch-less these days and just use their cellphones anyways.
::shrug::

Agree. I think the question is not if this is a watch to wear to an interview, but if it's a watch to wear, period. My answer is no.

It looks a little like someone trying to be high-tech in an 80's way.

The above watch is way sexier.
 
Is this a joke? It's a watch........not that many people even wear watches anymore with the prevalence of cell phones......

Wear whatever watch you like and you find comfortable. They're going to be a lot more concerned with "did he make the grades and is this guy a good guy who I want to work with?" than "well, he did get a 265 on step1, 3.9 GPA with all clinical honors, AOA, 2 publications, but he did wear that watch that was a little less classy than that other guy...."
 
Yeah, did you know some of the high end Rolex watches are so non water resistant that they come with warnings about sweat? Not for the.band, for the mechanical bits. totally worth 20k 🙄
Don't be ridiculous. You don't actually believe this do you? The oyster cases are all resistant to at least 100m, when properly maintained. Their Cellini line is their dress watch line and even they are resistant to 30m. You'll survive a fall off your boat, or into the pool, even a sweaty day on the links.:laugh:

Uh no. Most rolexes use ETA level movements, they're not any different than the vast majority of European watches on the market. Rolexes are known for ornamental value and case design, not the complexity or quality of the movements.
All of their modern movements are made in house. They are not known for their fine finishes, etc. but they are legendary for their quality workhorse movements.

Go big or go home.
2bcXz.jpg

This watch looks too big for your wrist, though it could be the photo. Its an interesting choice, only one hand is fine for when you're retired, maybe not the best choice for a working physician.😉

To the OP, I recommend something like this...
0bb2671b.jpg

8dd0c109.jpg
 
Watches, leather or otherwise, aren't formalwear. They're businesswear. A watch should never be worn with a tux; true formalwear is for a social occasion, you shouldn't be concerned what time it is. Wearing a watch with a metal band with a suit is like wearing loafers with a suit for an interview; people do it, but that doesn't mean it isn't wrong. You can buy a watch with a leather band (such as a seiko) for $50.

I think leather watches are ugly. Metal bands >>>>> leather bands, and I don't care if you're wearing a suit, tux, or what.

It's not required to wear a watch, but wearing one that isn't appropriate could potentially hurt you.

Unless you're wearing a 8 inch sundial on your arm this statement is a little dramatic. You're not going to be broken because the leather on your watch isn't the exact shade that your shoes are.
 
I think Kenneth Cole has a nice series of affordable and sleek watches (I hate Bullova)

6fCXuYj9Z2C9K4BSV5NnTofBRh9mN2ykRKdajHh9mz4M45x-TziskvfcTuYD1gVjTJIbk14hdaJSaFEi99zCNsYRMPrEFCTrt_-XvbNKELlb133yu-L6aW6PCFoOGzH1FR3ggnE2WHPh



BzNUlwE1gOxNRlUoZQ10P3QPU60KQzyCEu-qG6YUU884KYxQl-BABv9mP1R3nqbvLx5t1p7Zgj7So9O26Ukmp4pFLLrO1Vev94AVikZLNOW2SXDTpOyNGA3P0bw3i7YHTXjgtxN9PjwMd_4e9ut4o_MLq2B4YUT_zTNSwnUPD71y312XN_Rm9uJEN9d5A9l9BA


6VtonhjrBKs9h_Jor91tLRyrVh_RMDB4DmEw3JZICLHZlmtnD8sVT4zHOZGBIjNtkof7_2uItiPWdWwwcRVC4GhCNy1XJRpUeYOdfsV63Ivdo8Wkg9L1CIXHSh3q2yLBwdQbezvf2lRa0g5unFbfSXqhufIs_rrhfopcHcVsCW9DJxXMl5QzWqBBqyhAyltWH1lrAGrBIlbRs1bCYvbV0sxDrFuRcKyljgWjrzAO_nluwZhTDIutjI9XjtBNwsJSLenfJrDfLon53OiVtqXD6ji-Z8lzbZF-02HJ10kq3Ul62d4NhNUGiLheaSH7RR5uRavuTw



Mw8E-O7mPtH-WBLQsCbep03nixNkw6L8iuCBGq7QgUO7r1s1QY7GNOJGsmbJb24n82o69zalH0MOSRNZc3Jn9HJZJ12ynMXL4VLXHG5AZ1Qg5gRM2YTSBtavzB7E3mVYuUUA2--0MDB5BaOtTdD44cRWKIAH8oGcHFXCu9q5l6ckw_-QH1I9MmieFPjhhX4eO2VBCTqlVtx9TzrMDBtxOWNPkmEMIw


The most expensive watch here is $130 (in stores) and cheaper on Amazon I think
 
Don't be ridiculous. You don't actually believe this do you? The oyster cases are all resistant to at least 100m, when properly maintained. Their Cellini line is their dress watch line and even they are resistant to 30m. You'll survive a fall off your boat, or into the pool, even a sweaty day on the links.:laugh:


All of their modern movements are made in house. They are not known for their fine finishes, etc. but they are legendary for their quality workhorse movements.



This watch looks too big for your wrist, though it could be the photo. Its an interesting choice, only one hand is fine for when you're retired, maybe not the best choice for a working physician.😉

To the OP, I recommend something like this...
0bb2671b.jpg

8dd0c109.jpg

Well.... yes... because that's what I was told at a Rolex store in hawaii as opposed to some idiot on the other end of the internet :shrug:
 
I would probably notice an interviewee's watch. If you interview for a more "regular job", they might notice your watch too. Just sayin.
 
Well.... yes... because that's what I was told at a Rolex store in hawaii as opposed to some idiot on the other end of the internet :shrug:

Well I've collected watches for over 20 years, including Rolex. Watch guys generally know more about watches than most sales people. I wouldn't trust much that a salesman, or recruiter, tells you except the price. However you don't have to believe me, you can research the topic yourself on the Rolex website. Their dress line, though not their most expensive watches, is Cellini. 30m water resistant. They're dress watches, but they are designed to handle rain, accidental exposure, sweat, etc. who would buy a modern watch that has no water resistance? Its possible they were referring to something vintage, you can't trust water resistance on many vintage pieces. In fact its prudent and inexpensive to get any watches that you're thinking about taking into the water pressure tested every year or two. No movements can handle exposure to water if the seals fail and flood the watch. Maybe that's what she was hinting at?
The watch in my photo above is a complicated platinum chronograph, certainly not made for swimming, but it is still 30m water resistant. It can take a fall off the boat as well.
When I was in Florida for my oral board exam years ago I had to reach into the pool that I was walking past to pull out some young kid that was drowning. Nobody saw anything until I pulled him out. Fortunately my trusty IWC had 60 or 100m water resistance, I can't remember.👍
Cheers!
 
All of their modern movements are made in house. They are not known for their fine finishes, etc. but they are legendary for their quality workhorse movements.

I know they're in-house, but not very complicated, which is why I said ETA level. The average person thinks about Rollies as iced-out bling that costs 20k; nm that a sea-dweller is barely 5k.

Nice Lange, I'll post some pics of mine later.
 
Top