It’s a hostile takeover by the nurse industries

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Steven Caban

Junior Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
20+ Year Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2003
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi there, you guys almost make me sad, do you know that as I write this and as you study for your MCATS, there is a Nurse in the mayo clinic taking a 12 month program, in a despicable intention to replace a cardiologist. Did you know that anesthesiologist are in the same boat so are the OB/Gyn. Waaaaaaaaaaaaake up, you are being replaced by Nurse Practitioners . they are now able to take and do your job for half the price. Is it just me or is this a major slippery slope future medical doctors are facing. People, for every year you’re in school, nurse practitioner and DNP’s are popping up left and right, with the excuse that they are filling in the rural area shortage of medical dr’s, that is BS, the truth is they are staging the most excellent hostile take over using the government and even our own licensing agencies like the NBME, who has agreed to certify with one test and make it possible to get your job. Last I checked , that should be a red flag for all of us to wake up and start the marching down Washington, picket lines, civil disobedience and the whole shebang, after all, they are TAKING YOUR JOB. People make no mistake, I respect nurses, but they are saying that we are just wasting our time in school, that research has demonstrated over and over, that we don’t need to take the MCAT or any of the excessive education (the way they put it), I don’t have to cite anyone, just go online and you will read terrible things they say. People I think it’s time we defend ourselves , no more acting like if taking the MCAT is going to be the right thing to do, it’s not if your nurse counterpart(as they say) doesn’t even need to take it. My two cents. Hope I get some sort of response, this way I can feel some hope for us.
 
Hi there, you guys almost make me sad, do you know that as I write this and as you study for your MCATS, there is a Nurse in the mayo clinic taking a 12 month program, in a despicable intention to replace a cardiologist. Did you know that anesthesiologist are in the same boat so are the OB/Gyn. Waaaaaaaaaaaaake up, you are being replaced by Nurse Practitioners . they are now able to take and do your job for half the price. Is it just me or is this a major slippery slope future medical doctors are facing. People, for every year you’re in school, nurse practitioner and DNP’s are popping up left and right, with the excuse that they are filling in the rural area shortage of medical dr’s, that is BS, the truth is they are staging the most excellent hostile take over using the government and even our own licensing agencies like the NBME, who has agreed to certify with one test and make it possible to get your job. Last I checked , that should be a red flag for all of us to wake up and start the marching down Washington, picket lines, civil disobedience and the whole shebang, after all, they are TAKING YOUR JOB. People make no mistake, I respect nurses, but they are saying that we are just wasting our time in school, that research has demonstrated over and over, that we don’t need to take the MCAT or any of the excessive education (the way they put it), I don’t have to cite anyone, just go online and you will read terrible things they say. People I think it’s time we defend ourselves , no more acting like if taking the MCAT is going to be the right thing to do, it’s not if your nurse counterpart(as they say) doesn’t even need to take it. My two cents. Hope I get some sort of response, this way I can feel some hope for us.
Dey took err jerrrbs!
 
I was kinda under the impression that there's currently (and will definately be in the future) a gigantic shortage of physicians...
i'm pretty sure anyone working in the health field will not have that hard of a time finding a job.
I don't know about this, but I THINK cooperation between primary care providers whatever they may choose to be, will ultimately provide the best care for the patient...
 
Hi there, you guys almost make me sad, do you know that as I write this and as you study for your MCATS, there is a Nurse in the mayo clinic taking a 12 month program, in a despicable intention to replace a cardiologist. Did you know that anesthesiologist are in the same boat so are the OB/Gyn. Waaaaaaaaaaaaake up, you are being replaced by Nurse Practitioners . they are now able to take and do your job for half the price. Is it just me or is this a major slippery slope future medical doctors are facing. People, for every year you’re in school, nurse practitioner and DNP’s are popping up left and right, with the excuse that they are filling in the rural area shortage of medical dr’s, that is BS, the truth is they are staging the most excellent hostile take over using the government and even our own licensing agencies like the NBME, who has agreed to certify with one test and make it possible to get your job. Last I checked , that should be a red flag for all of us to wake up and start the marching down Washington, picket lines, civil disobedience and the whole shebang, after all, they are TAKING YOUR JOB. People make no mistake, I respect nurses, but they are saying that we are just wasting our time in school, that research has demonstrated over and over, that we don’t need to take the MCAT or any of the excessive education (the way they put it), I don’t have to cite anyone, just go online and you will read terrible things they say. People I think it’s time we defend ourselves , no more acting like if taking the MCAT is going to be the right thing to do, it’s not if your nurse counterpart(as they say) doesn’t even need to take it. My two cents. Hope I get some sort of response, this way I can feel some hope for us.
Pllleaasseee don't get this going here. Please start a thread in the general pre-med forum instead of cluttering up this school-specific thread. I like this thread and don't want to have to work around this debate here. Thanks.
 
I was kinda under the impression that there's currently (and will definately be in the future) a gigantic shortage of physicians...
i'm pretty sure anyone working in the health field will not have that hard of a time finding a job.
I don't know about this, but I THINK cooperation between primary care providers whatever they may choose to be, will ultimately provide the best care for the patient...


I understand and i also like the idea you propose, but i don’t in anyway think that losing my job to a NP is the way to do this so called cooperation, they are not cooperating, they are taking over. If you want to help , join the team, but this is not their intention, their intention is obvious, the inferior complex has finally found a way to damage hard working professionals. In my experience in medicine, the less you know , the more tests you run, it will be an economical disaster. And then the nurses will look to the side and say, oops, o well, you’re the doctors, your suppose to be the smart ones.
 
Pllleaasseee don't get this going here. Please start a thread in the general pre-med forum instead of cluttering up this school-specific thread. I like this thread and don't want to have to work around this debate here. Thanks.


no problem, already done, thanks for responses though , feeling kind of down with this entire issue.
 
no problem, already done, thanks for responses though , feeling kind of down with this entire issue.
Keep your head up! We are doing a good thing. Doctors will never become "obsolete". Good luck with the MCAT studying! 🙂
 
super-cool-story-bro.png
 
Oh hey, this is the first time anyone has said this on this forum. Thanks, I was about to make a big mistake.
 
OP, if you resent the MCAT so much and you respect nurses so much... go to nursing school.
 
Steven, this is your first post in several years. Are you currently a medical student somewhere?


Indeed, almost done, but sad to see how the future docs are going in to a medical field that is being taken over in front of their faces and do nothing to stop it. So sad, so sad... by the way BBender , was it necessary to make fun of my post , here is your wake up call, and my proof, check it out.


Hey we forgot to laugh about this, check out what I found on the Internet, let’s all laugh about how they take our jobs. I especially like the part where I cite the Precedent of the AAFP(AMA delegates) criticizing what is going on, I am sure he is a clown in his work, yea right, grow up people , this isn’t south park, its America, and your studying to lose your job to an NP, no matter how you slice it. Get it? And by the way, to be a Doctor, you have to be a mature person, just a little tip for you guys.


AMA Delegates Oppose DNPs as Medical Team Leaders
Midwifery, Medical Imaging Also Topics at Annual Meeting
By Cindy Borgmeyer • Chicago
6/25/2008
Delegates at the recent annual meeting of the AMA House of Delegates here left little room for doubt when it came to their views on the appropriate role of nurses in patients' medical care. Although nurses -- including those with a terminal degree in nursing -- are welcomed as part of the medical team, physicians still need to take the lead.
Despite strongly worded opposition from national nursing organization representatives who attended the meeting, the delegates adopted a resolution that called for new AMA policy stipulating that doctors of nursing practice, or DNPs, "must practice as part of a medical team under the supervision of a licensed physician who has final authority and responsibility for the patient."

The delegates further directed the AMA to oppose a recent move by the National Board of Medical Examiners, or NBME, which earlier this spring announced (6-page PDF; About PDFs) it would develop and administer a certification exam for graduates of DNP programs.
ACADEMY TESTIMONY FOCUSES ON DNP SCOPE, CLINICAL TRAINING
AAFP President-elect Ted Epperly, M.D., of Boise, Idaho, clearly voiced the Academy's support for the resolution during testimony to the AMA Reference Committee on Legislation on June 15, citing multiple concerns the AAFP has previously expressed (Members Only) about the DNP issue.

Perhaps chief among those concerns are the precise nature of the nursing practice doctorate and the vast differences in clinical training requirements between the DNP degree and a medical or osteopathic doctorate, Epperly noted.

"The current doctor of nursing practice refers to nurses who have a doctorate for reasons of education, research and scholarly work," he said. "It is not a clinical doctorate."

In fact, Epperly added, a DNP candidate completes only about 500 hours of additional training after receiving his or her master's degree. "That compares to about 9,000 to 15,000 hours of work that it takes a physician to become a primary care physician and a true doctor," he said.

In his testimony, Epperly also criticized the NBME's recent announcement that it would begin administering an assessment exam to graduates of DNP programs, saying the national board had "crossed the line" in making this decision. "This is not the National Board of Nursing Examiners, it's the National Board of Medical Examiners," he noted.
NBME LAYS OUT PLANS TO ADMINISTER DNP EXAM
In a recently published article in The National Board Examiner (6-page PDF; About PDFs), the National Board of Medical Examiners described its plans to administer the doctor of nursing practice, or DNP, exam.

"The DNP examination will assess the knowledge and cognitive skills necessary to support advanced clinical practice by DNP graduates. It will be comparable in content, similar in format and will measure similar competencies and apply similar performance standards as Step 3 of USMLE," the article reads, referring to the U.S. Medical Licensing Examination.

"Step 3, the last in the USMLE sequence of examinations, provides a final assessment of physicians assuming independent responsibility for delivering general medical care," the Examiner article continues. "The DNP examination will assess some of the competencies assessed by Step 3 and will be administered to DNP graduates for the first time in November 2008."
NURSES DENOUNCE AMA'S DNP MEASURE
Following up on a June 11 letter (3-page PDF; About PDFs) from the American Nurses Association, or ANA, to the reference committee, Eileen Carlson, J.D., R.N., associate director of government affairs for the ANA and an official observer from that association to the AMA House, spoke against the resolution in the reference committee hearing. She urged that the measure be withdrawn or defeated, noting that the nursing community views this issue as one of expanding access to care and pointing out that some 22 states now permit some level of independent nurse practice.

Finally, Carlson questioned the AMA's attempt to intercede in what she said the nursing profession sees as an internal issue. "It is no more appropriate for the AMA to regulate nursing practice than it would be for the ANA to regulate medical practice," she told reference committee members.
WHEN IS A DOCTOR NOT A DOCTOR?
Another point Epperly made in his reference committee testimony on the DNP resolution -- that use of the term "doctor" in a clinical care setting can mislead patients if it's not reserved solely for physicians -- also pertains to another measure AMA delegates adopted June 17. That resolution calls for the AMA to "advocate that professionals in the clinical setting clearly and accurately identify to patients their qualifications and degree(s) attained." The resolution also directs the AMA to develop model legislation to help states implement that action and to support state legislation that would make misrepresentation a felony.

AMA delegates also dealt with numerous other professional issues, adopting resolutions that call for the AMA to:
• advocate for licensure only of those nurse-midwives who have been certified by the American College of Nurse-Midwives,
• support state legislation requiring appropriate physician and regulatory oversight of nurse-midwives,
• continue to monitor states' midwifery licensure and scope of practice activities,
• work with state medical societies and medical specialty organizations to safeguard maternal and neonatal health with regard to midwifery issues,
• support state legislation acknowledging that hospitals or appropriately regulated birthing centers are the safest settings for labor and delivery,
• oppose legislative and regulatory efforts to restrict the delivery of advanced imaging services provided by qualified physicians in accordance with established clinical guidelines and technical standards, and
• ensure that physicians of all specialties engaged in providing needed imaging services to their patients have an equal say in developing quality and efficiency measures for those services.

Rather than a generic focus of education, Nurse Practitioners are able to specialize in an area of study they desire (e.g. Pediatrics, Family Practice, Adult, Geriatric, etc.), and provide care within the scope of their expertise. As well, Nurse practitioners in certain states can be “psychiatric clinicians” and perform similar practice (though at a different level) as a psychiatrist would.
Salary.com: Nurse Practitioner salary (25th-75th percentile) is $67,166 – $78,497. Generalist physician salary (25th-75th%) is $115,260 – $152,715.
Wikipedia: According to numerous salary reports throughout the years, CRNAs remain the highest compensated of all nursing specialties. Their average reported annual salary range in 2006, reported by the AMGA Medical Group Compensation and Financial Survey, was $140,396. The mean annual salary for an anesthesiologist in the United States in 2006 was $184,340. [1]
What’s my point? Fair question. First, NP’s have the same scope of practice as any physician. This is clear from my first statement about NP’s specializing. Whatever specialty you want as a physician, there’s an NP that can do the same thing. “But surely not for surgery?!” is the cry of retort. Well I promise you that within the next 10 years, some politician is going to realize that “Hey! PA’s and Surgical Tech’s can pop out gallbladders just as well as a surgeon can!”
Also note the salary differences. Now I can’t find information regarding the various NP specialties, but compare the lowest specialty to the most basic NP, the salaries are comparable, and the highest NP position to the highest (according to MSN.com) paid physician. When you do, you’ll note that physicians do, in fact, win. And NP’s must do 2 years of post bachelors work and one year of work experience (for a total of 3 years) compared to the 4 years post-undergrad for a physician. Big whoop. One year.
Well please note, the average med student graduates with around $200K in debt, while, according to Barry.edu (a school in FL that has both NP and PA programs) the PA program (the more expensive of the two) is $24,810.00 per year. This is roughly equivalent to medical school. However, you’re paying twice as much in med school because you go to school for twice as long. Also, one of the 3 requisite years for NP school is clinical experience. This is a paid job. RN’s make (again, 25th-75th%) $49,479 – $59,114. That means that if a med student and an NP were compared at the same time, 4 years post undergrad, the med student would be out $200,000 (roughly) and the NP would be out $521 (rounding to $25K/yr for both programs, and using the 25th percentile for RN’s). Add the interest on a med school loan, and that puts you at about $600,000 paid back (bc you pay back about 3x what you borrow, esp the financial geniuses that make up our MD population).
Now lets say that no matter what you do, you make $30,000/year more than your equivalent NP. You figure that after 30 years of practice (putting you at the nice comfortable retirement age of 66 for those of us that took the direct route) and you’re up $900K. Worth it, right? Well we haven’t incorporated malpractice insurance. Have you ever heard of anyone suing their NP? I sure as **** haven’t. Factor in 30 years of malpractice insurance bills, and I’ll promise you it brings you right back to even (not to mention that physicians’ salaries are trending down relative to inflation while all nursing salaries are trending up). Couple that with the hours worked by an NP relative to an M.D. and the paperwork/legal hassles handled by an MD that aren’t worried about by NP’s, and the conclusion is obvious.
Do the same thing for the same amount of money, and have a better quality of life. Become an NP.


NBME Development of a Certifying Examination for Doctors of Nursing Practice
This white paper delineates the National Board of Medical Examiners’ (NBME) rationale for providing assessment services to the Council for the Advancement of Comprehensive Care (CACC)*, a leadership group in the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) community. Through articulation of the rationale for developing this examination, this document reaffirms the NBME’s commitment to its mission to protect the health of the public by providing high quality assessment services to healthcare professional organizations. NBME Mission To protect the health of the public through state of the art assessment of health professionals. While centered on assessment of physicians, this mission encompasses the spectrum of health professionals along the continuum of education, training, and practice and includes research in evaluation as well as development of assessment instruments. The NBME has a tradition of assisting many health professions in developing assessment instruments to assess qualifications and assure patients that individual professionals meet standards defined by their profession. NBME initially provided voluntary certification for physician licensure; however, for nearly 50 years, NBME has provided assessments for a range of others in the health professions. In addition to the several American Board of Medical Specialties member boards and other medical professional organizations currently served, NBME clients also include the American Association of Medical Assistants, the American Physical Therapy Association, and the National Commission for the Certification of Anesthesiologist Assistants. The NBME first assisted in the preparation of assessments for advanced practice nurses and physician assistants more than 30 years ago. Providing a DNP certification examination is aligned with the NBME’s mission and its history.
* Since the initial agreement between the NBME and CACC, CACC has established the American Board of Comprehensive Care as the certifying body for DNPs (see http://www.abcc.dnpcert.org/about.shtml).
2
The CACC Certifying Exam On March 17, 2008, the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) entered into a contractual agreement with the Council for the Advancement of Comprehensive Care (CACC) to develop a certification examination for qualified graduates of Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) programs across the United States. The Certification Examination will assess the knowledge and skills necessary for nurse clinicians to provide safe and effective patient-centered comprehensive care. The Certification Examination is envisioned as one element of a three-part process for DNP certification. Candidates must first possess an active license as an advanced practice nurse. Second, they must successfully complete the educational requirements of the DNP program. The DNP degree builds on nursing licensure as an advanced practice nurse by adding expanded coverage of the knowledge and skill relating to both the nursing and medical aspects of care for complex illness. Finally, successful candidates must pass the certification examination. The examination is intended to offer an additional level of assurance to the public that graduates from the various educational programs have met a similar standard with regard to the domains assessed in the certification process. The DNP Certification Examination utilized the test blueprint developed for USMLE Step 3 as a basis for its design; however, a CACC-appointed expert committee made final decisions regarding the actual test design to be used, and the resulting design has different dimensions than the Step 3 examination. The exam will utilize test items previously used in the USMLE Step 3 examination; no items in current use in USMLE will appear in the CACC exam. The CACC-appointed expert committee will establish its separate pass/fail standard, informed by information about the pass/fail standard for USMLE Step 3. The exam will be shorter than USMLE Step 3, will contain a different mix of multiple-choice questions, and will initially not use the computer-based patient management simulations that are part of USMLE Step 3, although this test format will be added in the future. CACC will define eligibility requirements for taking its examination; these requirements will differ substantially from USMLE Step 3 requirements, for example, no formal clinical skills assessment or test of fundamental science knowledge will be prerequisites.




Mayo School of Health Sciences
I Love the Program goals, check them out, seem familiar, kind of like training to be a MD. Hahahah, you guys still don’t get it.
Program Description
Mayo School of Health Sciences (MSHS) offers a Cardiology Nurse Practitioner (NP) Fellowship which accepts one new graduate per year from an accredited nurse practitioner school. As a result of the program experience, the fellow will to be more competitive for cardiology specialty nurse practitioner positions and have increased security in the job market.

The fellow will be selected after submitting three letters of recommendation, transcripts from baccalaureate and master’s schools, statement of personal intent and the interview process. The NP must have an Arizona NP license and Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) provider number at the onset of the program. A 12-month didactic program will provide clinical experience in all aspects of cardiovascular disease including: cardiac diagnostics, cardiac health and prevention, interventional cardiology, electrophysiology cardiology, peripheral vascular disease, valvular heart disease, advanced heart disease and adult congenital heart disease. These rotations are primarily at inpatient setting at Mayo Clinic Hospital (MCH) but may have limited rotations with subspecialty providers at outpatient settings at Mayo Clinic Specialty Building (MCSB). A certification of completion will be provided by the Mayo School of Health Sciences upon completion of the program.

The didactic program will provide 300 didactic/classroom hours and 1,700 clinical/preceptored hours. The didactic learning will consist of Cardiology Rounds, Cath Lab Conferences, Echo Conferences, EP Conferences, lectures, research utilization, journal clubs, self-learning case studies

Program Goals
The Cardiology Nurse Practitioner Fellowship aims to help the participating fellow:
• Understand cardiovascular diseases pathophysiology, clinical presentations and prognosis
• Develop diagnoses, formulate a treatment plan and follow-up on patient response to treatment
• Discuss evidence-based medicine practices using highest-quality cost-effective care
• Develop organizational skills to manage patient caseload throughout hospital stay including admission, daily rounds and dismissal, while remaining cognizant of the patient’s emotional, physical and spiritual needs
• Educate patient and families regarding disease process including primary and secondary cardiac prevention
• Develop effective communication skills with collaborating physicians and allied healthcare team
• Transition student to nurse practitioner role
Accreditation
Continuing Medical Education (CME) hours will be provided by Medical Education for medical conferences sponsored by Mayo Clinic and Continuing Education Unit (CEU) hours for nursing licensing renewal will be provided by nursing approved courses at Mayo Clinic and outside national educational conference allotted in this program. Mayo Clinic Arizona will be applying for American Nursing Credentialing Center (ANCC) CEUs for formal lectures throughout the hospital rotations.
 
I simply don't buy all this hysteria about nurses/PAs taking over medicine. It's simply paranoia and hysteria. Is medicine evolving? YES; has medicine always evolved? THANK GOD YES. Aside from nursing/PA-ing, medical specialty boundaries are always being blurred and redefined by advances in knowledge and technology but that's another subject...
For some perspective (FY 2008):

Physicians and surgeons - 661,400
US Pop. ~ 300,000,000

Physicians/1000 people ~ 2.2
There clearly aren't enough Docs to go around so we must collaborate with other health professionals. So yes it's a collaborative relationship and physicians will always be the top medical professional responsible for patients' care in such interdisciplinary settings. Simply put, NPs/PAs simply lack the level of education and specialized training to replace physicians.

The notion that an NP with a 1yr Card training is any threat to a Cardiologist with ~6yrs of PG training is really ridiculous... However, even these specialized NPs have critical roles to play given current physician shortages, the impending babyboomer exodus and chronic disparities in healthcare access..

Finally, I thinks there's already a model on how these nursing specialists and MDs can coexist - cRNAs and Anesthesiologists- each has a role to play, and cRNAs have not replaced Anesthesiologists.
 
Last edited:
I simply don't buy all this hysteria about nurses/PAs taking over medicine. It's simply paranoia and hysteria. Is medicine evolving? YES; has medicine always evolved? THANK GOD YES. Aside from nursing/PA-ing, medical specialty boundaries are always being blurred and redefined by advances in knowledge and technology but that's another subject...
For some perspective (FY 2008):

Physicians and surgeons - 661,400
US Pop. ~ 300,000,000

Physicians/1000 people ~ 2.2
There clearly aren't enough Docs to go around so we must collaborate with other health professionals. So yes it's a collaborative relationship and physicians will always be the top medical professional responsible for patients' care in such interdisciplinary settings. Simply put, NPs/PAs simply lack the level of education and specialized training to replace physicians.

The notion that an NP with a 1yr Card training is any threat to a Cardiologist with ~6yrs of PG training is really ridiculous... However, even these specialized NPs have critical roles to play given current physician shortages, the impending babyboomer exodus and chronic disparities in healthcare access..

Finally, I thinks there's already a model on how these nursing specialists and MDs can coexist - cRNAs and Anesthesiologists- each has a role to play, and cRNAs have not replaced Anesthesiologists.
This^...I have yet to see much tension between MD's PA's and NP'S myself.
 
I am a nurse have been one for 3 years. I work in a CVICU so I have spent a lot of time in direct contact with doctors and NP/PA. Trust me, the work that NP/PA are doing is NOT something you are going to miss. In the hospital they write out orders and H&Ps. Basically do scut work so the MDs can go home. In the clinics they take a large burden off of the MDs by seeing pts that don't need anything but to have their throat swabbed or told go home and stop wasting peoples time.

The NP/PA wade through all the fodder so that the doctors can spend their time worrying about sick patients. It works out quite nicely for everyone.
 
Hi there, you guys almost make me sad, do you know that as I write this and as you study for your MCATS, there is a Nurse in the mayo clinic taking a 12 month program, in a despicable intention to replace a cardiologist. Did you know that anesthesiologist are in the same boat so are the OB/Gyn. Waaaaaaaaaaaaake up, you are being replaced by Nurse Practitioners . they are now able to take and do your job for half the price. Is it just me or is this a major slippery slope future medical doctors are facing. People, for every year you're in school, nurse practitioner and DNP's are popping up left and right, with the excuse that they are filling in the rural area shortage of medical dr's, that is BS, the truth is they are staging the most excellent hostile take over using the government and even our own licensing agencies like the NBME, who has agreed to certify with one test and make it possible to get your job. Last I checked , that should be a red flag for all of us to wake up and start the marching down Washington, picket lines, civil disobedience and the whole shebang, after all, they are TAKING YOUR JOB. People make no mistake, I respect nurses, but they are saying that we are just wasting our time in school, that research has demonstrated over and over, that we don't need to take the MCAT or any of the excessive education (the way they put it), I don't have to cite anyone, just go online and you will read terrible things they say. People I think it's time we defend ourselves , no more acting like if taking the MCAT is going to be the right thing to do, it's not if your nurse counterpart(as they say) doesn't even need to take it. My two cents. Hope I get some sort of response, this way I can feel some hope for us.

orly.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Hey, the more PA's and NP's the merrier. At least that is the vibe I got from a FP physician I spoke too about this some time ago. This particular physician owned a practice with three satellite offices where twenty mid-level practitioners worked as an extension of his practice. He receives a percentage of every exam, procedure etc... That amounts to quite a bit of money for simply signing off on others work. However, he did indicate that the quality of the mid-level was key and he wouldn't hire just anyone, which is understandable because his reputation and license is on the line.

As for the takeover, Sounds like physician's need to continue to distinguish themselves as leaders in medicine. Unfortunately, lowering the standards of admission by removing the MCAT would probably be the wrong direction to take.
 
I'm not really worried. The reason being because well there is a hugeeeeeeeeeeee shortage of health care providers. We all have our place (MD, DO, PharmD, DPM, etc...) and we will all have jobs. I think the true question it boils down to is that are you okay with having limited scope of practice, i feel with our medical degree; we can go more in depth of the situation. I personally like knowing as much as possible and having the autonomy of making the decisions, even at higher levels (yes i do understand the concepts of specialists still). Plus i love nurses, they make our life so much easier and like someone pointed out they do lot of the scut work.
 
And then the nurses will look to the side and say, oops, o well, you’re the doctors, your suppose to be the smart ones.

Aww man, it sounds like these Nurse Practitioner programs don't even require an elementary knowledge of grammar!!
 
I'm just waiting for the epic 'face palm' picture...:corny:
 
Here's the thing. Nurses know stuff. Really. When I was first starting at a volunteer job at a hospital a long time ago, one of the senior nurses there (great lady, super-funny, would often go out back for smoke breaks and talk about Harry Potter...) would tell me "When you become a resident, be nice to the nurses. We'll let you sleep."

You make this argument about nurses, but what about PAs that surgeons hire to first assist, close pts up while they move onto the next case, etc.? Are they "taking over surgery?" Uh, no. Are they educated enough to do what they do? Yeah. Are some certified nurse anesthetists just as good or better than an MD? Probably.

You can learn a LOT from nurses. Especially while volunteering. Want to see a good example of bedside manner? In most cases, you can watch a nurse (yeah, I know sometimes this isn't true 😀). They have a tough job but are a really important part of the patient care team. Plus, if you act all haughty about everything, what's going to happen when you can't place an IV during the first year of your hotshot residency program? Who do you ask? The attending? No...the residents? Eh...don't want to look like an idiot...Ah...the nurses.

Seriously. Be nice to them, they aren't taking over, and they are usually much nicer to talk to (and look at) then 99% of attendings you will ever encounter. What's not to like?
 
Top