- Joined
- Feb 5, 2013
- Messages
- 1,229
- Reaction score
- 1,140
http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1865002&JamaNetworkReader=True
Saw this paper in JAMA psych, I have to admit I'm pretty bad at trying to figure out what information is actually useful in meta-analyses because everything has been reduced down to simple numbers after tons of stats. So was wondering what you all find interesting, helpful, etc from this study? Most of the results seem not so surprising.
Did find it interesting in the discussion when it said "notably the effect sizes were overall similar to many common general medicine drugs [citation], providing important perspective." I dont really know enough statistics to know what that actually means
Saw this paper in JAMA psych, I have to admit I'm pretty bad at trying to figure out what information is actually useful in meta-analyses because everything has been reduced down to simple numbers after tons of stats. So was wondering what you all find interesting, helpful, etc from this study? Most of the results seem not so surprising.
Did find it interesting in the discussion when it said "notably the effect sizes were overall similar to many common general medicine drugs [citation], providing important perspective." I dont really know enough statistics to know what that actually means