alexjr79

Junior Member
15+ Year Member
Feb 20, 2004
2
0
Status (Visible)
Im a little bit confuse, and i dont want to buy a lot of reviewer, i was wondring would you go for kaplan books alone, or other recommended books are enough, like BRS physio,lippincot biochem, Microbio made it rediculously simple,lippincot pharma and etc....which is which??? help me guys
 

DrSmiles

Senior Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Nov 11, 2002
213
0
Phoenix
Status (Visible)
  1. Attending Physician
On that same note I hear Kaplan's Path books are practically useless, and for the DO students I hear you better go out and pick up an extra anatomy review book because I have been told that it is only covered superficially in Kaplan- gearing it more towards the USMLE.
 
About the Ads

jed2023

Senior Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Nov 11, 2002
132
1
New York
Status (Visible)
I can only assume that you are talking about the Kaplan Lecture Notes and not the Home Study Notes. I think the physio, biochem, and neuroanatomy sections are better than other comparable resources. (Yeah, I know most people are stuck on BRS for Phys and HY for Neuro.) Path is decidedly worse, but many people supplement with Goljan, who's also a lecturer for Kaplan. Micro and Pharm are good, but you really need the spoken lectures to flesh them out, since the notes for these two are so condensed. Anatomy is alright, although there are not as many MRIs and scans as the HY book by Dudek. Neuroanatomy is awesome w/ clear, filled-out explanations (as opposed to the one-liners in HY Neuro).

The notes, though, really are designed to be used in the setting of spoken lectures, whether via the internet (Webprep) or the review courses they hold. They can still be valuable without it but not to the same degree.
 

Molly Maquire

Senior Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Feb 2, 2003
253
1
Somewhere beyond the sea
Status (Visible)
HI,

I had the lecture notes and found the Biochem and Pharm to be better than any other source. Usually, students recommend Lippencott for these two subjects, but I found those to be too thick and dense to be useful for USMLE review. I also thought the Immunology section was excellent.
 

alexjr79

Junior Member
15+ Year Member
Feb 20, 2004
2
0
Status (Visible)
Thank you guys, that tip help a lot.
How about KAPLAN step 2 books? would you still recommend this books? Anyone using Snell anatomy reviewer? is it complete for anatomy?
 
This thread is more than 17 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  7. This thread is locked.