Kaplan organ books vs. lecture notes

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

BlueJasper

Full Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2007
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
Points
0
  1. Resident [Any Field]
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
which ones are better to use? I have heard the lecture notes are more concise, but do you think that the organ books are just as good?
 
I have the Lecture notes books and have used some of them. The Biochem/Genetics, Immunology section, and Anatomy book are all pretty good. The path book is pathetic, I don't like the Pharm, and the Behavioral science book personally but they are ok but I am not using them. I have seen the organ system books also and they seem to be the same thing but more condensed into smaller writing and pictures. Either way you can do well with either, but I am only using select ones. I am horribly disappointed with the majority of the Webprep lectures that correspond to the lecture notes books. I litened to all of them for the ones I used, but can't stand the lecturers for Phys, path, pharm, and immuno.
 
I also got the webprep and have to agree with you.

The path lectures are the most terrible, the guy is just reading straight out of the book without any tie in or elaboration
 
Top Bottom