Kaplan verbal justification

Started by wiloghby
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

wiloghby

Perpetually interviewing
10+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Hi everyone,

I did a passage sometime last week in Kaplan verbal where they were asking what I could infer about what the author meant when he was making a point. I picked an answer that was a nearly verbatim sentence from the passage clearly offered as an explanation of his point a few sentences later. This answer was wrong because it was "explicitly stated" and thus could not justfiably be "inferred".

I have two questions:
1) WTF?

2) Does anyone know if AAMC shares this narrow definition of permissible answers for "infer/imply" type questions? As in, if I'm down to two choices and pick the one that is obviously stated in the passage, is that wrong if the word "imply/infer" is in the question stem?