Question: Which of the following conclusions not presented in the passage might be an alternate explanation for the map experiments described by the author?
My thought was that they were testing to see if you understand the main idea and conclusion that was presented and can find it in other answers. Or a different way to support the conclusion but it turns out that this question is asking for what alternative explanation will weaken the stated conclusion.....why is that? Is it because it's not stated in the passage or does alternate explanation always mean something that doesn't support?
My thought was that they were testing to see if you understand the main idea and conclusion that was presented and can find it in other answers. Or a different way to support the conclusion but it turns out that this question is asking for what alternative explanation will weaken the stated conclusion.....why is that? Is it because it's not stated in the passage or does alternate explanation always mean something that doesn't support?
