Damn, I go to work and have all these questions to answer..
PEEP of 15 in an asthmatic? Peds?
HH
No, she was 43.
I also don't understand the quote above.
Was your patient not on continuous nebs before? Were you trying ketamine without continuous nebs?
HH
Yes she was on continuous nebs, and all of the above. I guess that could have been said more clearly. I added vec to her in line nebs and ketamine in order to increase vent synchrony.
Cyclo -- I am really not trying to get on your case here -- please believe me...I am just confused by some of your recent posts.
In fact, I am super excited to hear about any study to get sub-disocciative ketamine into the EM literature more. I think this will get more docs using it and it will be nice to as "back-up" with the old-schoolers and RNs get all excited for nothing.
However, I don't understand how you are going to do a "double-blind" trial using ketamine. I am a "heavy user" (for my patients) of sub-dissociative ketamine (which I think is a mis-nomer -- analgesic-dosed ketamine is a better description, as the dissociation is not all or none, as many people believe) and it is very RARE that EVERYONE involved (MD, RN, patient, janitor) doesn't notice that ketamine was used.
If you can share how you are going to blind your study before publishing it, I would love to hear. However, I understand if you need to keep it secret for now.
Either way, I really look forward to your publication.
HH
I should rephrase. The patient and clinician will be blinded, the nurse will be the only one to know. We tried to get pharmacy to premix syringes so nobody who would be directly involved with care would know but it wasn't feasible.
Assuming the poster is using AC (volume), which the majority of EM docs use in my somewhat limited experience (about 10-15 EDs), I guess I am just a bit surprised that an EM doc would:
1. be in the group of docs who believe in "small airway stenting" for asthmatics
2. if #1, then have enough guts to increase the PEEP to 15 in the acute phase in the ED; especially in a patient with persistent "flat-elongated" "pressure-volume" loops, who must have quickly increasing plateau pressures (likely requiring manual compression every few breaths with a PEEP of 15 (again we are in the acute phase here, just after intubation
3. if #1 and #2, then not aware that ketamine alone is insufficient for "dialation" of airways and that nebulized bronchodialtors are needed (and that a "full 2 minutes" is not going to be enough time)
Just doesn't seem plausible, nevermind a good idea in the minutes after intubation.
HH
In response to 1 and 2. I set the PEEP based on the patients lower inflection point, and TV based on the upper. There are plenty of critical care manuscripts that support this for any intubated patient. Her plateaus were consistently less than 30 with those settings, and she turned around quickly.
Here is a quick read/summary regarding PEEP settings off the LIP measurement
http://www.ebmedicine.net/topics.php?paction=showTopicSeg&topic_id=89&seg_id=1712
Maybe I'm completely wrong but using the LIP from the PV loop to set PEEP makes sense to me. It takes the guesswork out of the picture.
Lastly, in response to 3, sure ketamine and nebs may take longer than "a full 2 minutes" but how long do you really want to wait to see if something works for a patient who is already on nebs, epi, steroids, mag, initial subdissociative dose of ketamine, etc... With a pCO2 of 100 who isn't turning around? 2 minutes after a full dose ketamine and BiPAP seemed like a reasonable time to me. She didn't turn around so she got tubed, and turned around shortly after.
Sorry if I come off sounding defensive, im not trying to sound like an ******* in my response, I just got a "holy **** this guy is ******ed wtf is he doing" vibe from your questions. And maybe I really have no idea wtf I'm doing, I'm still a newbie.