Kumar and Clark or Davidsons?

  • SDN Site Updates

    Hey everyone! The site will be down for approximately 2 hours on Thursday, August 5th for site updates.

    LEARN MORE
About the Ads
S

Singh

Senior Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Oct 10, 2003
130
1
Sweden
Status (Visible)
  1. Resident [Any Field]
I'm having to decide to buy one of the following books:
Kumar and Clark's Clinical medicine and Davidsons Principles of Medicine.

Any comments on which one I should buy?
 
V

Varblade

Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Jul 22, 2002
27
0
Malaysia
Status (Visible)
hey..

from my experience..

davidson has a better presentation, and features alot of good explainations of pathophysiology, tx, mx, etc..

Kumar and Clarks has more details relatively. But, ppl complain its arrangement of topics are abit haphazard.

u should thumb through both books...
 
ericdamiansean

ericdamiansean

High Profiler
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Jun 26, 2003
1,191
4
38
Status (Visible)
  1. Resident [Any Field]
Both books are good..i'm using davidsons

It's all about individual preference, like whether you like the text heavy Ganong for physio, or another book with lotsa pictures
 
About the Ads
This thread is more than 17 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  7. This thread is locked.
Top Bottom