Kumar and Clark or Davidsons?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Singh

Senior Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2003
Messages
130
Reaction score
1

Members don't see this ad.
I'm having to decide to buy one of the following books:
Kumar and Clark's Clinical medicine and Davidsons Principles of Medicine.

Any comments on which one I should buy?
 

Varblade

Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
hey..

from my experience..

davidson has a better presentation, and features alot of good explainations of pathophysiology, tx, mx, etc..

Kumar and Clarks has more details relatively. But, ppl complain its arrangement of topics are abit haphazard.

u should thumb through both books...
 

ericdamiansean

High Profiler
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2003
Messages
1,191
Reaction score
4
Both books are good..i'm using davidsons

It's all about individual preference, like whether you like the text heavy Ganong for physio, or another book with lotsa pictures
 
Top