Sorry if this has been discussed already but I didnt see much. I work as a tech in a research facility and as much as I try, sometimes I cant help but get attached to an animal and really struggle with it when the study ends. Im leaning towards lab animal medicine and Im sort of curious to hear from people in the field. Does it get easier when youre on the veterinary side vs lab tech side? Does anyone have any good ways to handle the emotions and even grief associated with the field?
Hi OP. This is an excellent question, and an important one to think about if you're considering a career in this field.
I distinctly recall my orientation to vet school- many of my classmates had spoken about their anxiety surrounding euthanasia. Although most of my classmates had witnessed euthanasia (generally, of pets), very few of them had performed the procedure themselves (or been tasked with the ultimate responsibility to make the decision- euthanize or not). Granted, the decision to euthanize rests in the hands of the owner when it comes to general practice, but the veterinarian must advise the client as to quality of life. Navigating these conversations is a completely different ballgame when you're the one directing the conversation, versus observing the interaction between the veterinarian and the client. I mention this to contrast my own experience upon entering veterinary school. By the time orientation had rolled around, I had euthanized hundreds of animals over the course of my 10+ year research career. I don't mention that statistic as a point of pride (hardly), just to provide a point of reference re: the type of euthanasia case load lab animal professionals handle over the course of their careers.
The day euthanasia doesn't bother you is the day you should quit veterinary medicine (generally) and lab animal medicine (specifically). I have been very attached to my research subjects in years past. I wouldn't say that euthanasia 'gets easier' with the passing of time, but I have a different context of understanding the procedure now than I did when I first started out. I chose a career in laboratory animal medicine because I passionately believe in the cause. A family member to whom I was very close died from an aggressive cancer at too young of an age. The disease was devastating, and absolutely heartbreaking to witness. I hope and pray that a cure to cancer, and other devastating diseases, may be uncovered by the end of my turn on this Earth. I'd love to say that this would be possible without the use of animal models. Unfortunately, the technology just isn't there yet (despite what many detractors will tell you). Animal rights extremists are fond of touting the use of alternative methods (cell culture, computer modeling) to replace animal models. In some cases, these are indeed excellent solutions that save animal lives. We haven't, however, come up with an effective way to model an intact, complex life form in its entirety. Such in vivo experiments are required at this stage in the game to investigate disease states and test new drugs. The day animal models can be completely replaced with in vitro capabilities, every laboratory animal professional will jump for joy and happily find a new job. It will be a great day for us all.
Until that time, myself and my colleagues do our utmost to ensure that animal research is done correctly, with a minimum of animal exposure to pain and distress. It's not an easy job, and it isn't for everyone. My strong sense of mission, and belief that I contribute to the relief of animal suffering (central to the veterinarian's oath), allows me to process the large scale of euthanasia that occurs in research facilities throughout the world. I still feel it (pangs of guilt), and it continues to hurt- it should. Animal research isn't a right. It's a privilege, and we should feel a pang of regret when we take one life for the benefit of another (human or animal). I firmly hold to the doctrine of Lord Eddard Stark in Game of Thrones: 'He who passes the sentence should swing the sword.' I must be rock-solid in my convictions to follow through on these actions. If I didn't believe in the necessity of the work (and the associated sacrifice), I'd be out of the field in a heartbeat. This conviction allows me to sleep at night.
As for grief- yes, I've experienced it, multiple times. One of the hardest actions I've had to undertake in my research career to date was the downsizing of a rodent colony in order to cut costs. This was mandated by my boss, and entailed the euthanasia of hundreds of mice. Fights over money don't magically disappear in lab animal medicine. Hardly. It's only the players and stakes that change. I had a really difficult time following through on this order, and told my boss so. I encourage any animal professional- technician, animal care staff, and veterinarian alike- to discuss their ethical concerns with the powers-that-be. Sometimes, verbalizing your emotions can help you to process them. It also gives the supervisor an indication as to where you're currently at with respect to compassion fatigue. Despite understanding the reason for the order, I fought it internally. Eventually, I followed through and have never forgotten it. Euthanizing a set of animals for the sake of potentially life-saving data is easier to swallow than euthanasia for the sake of saving money. This is the 'convenience/financial euthanasia' of the research world. Not all that different than what a private practice GP has to deal with, day in and day out.
There are countless examples I could provide throughout my research career of animals to whom I've become attached, and then lost at the end of an experiment. Or, decisions that I've had to make regarding humane endpoints- when is enough enough? Veterinary medicine, regardless of specialization, is largely a profession of grey. It is rarely ever black and white when it comes to decision making. You must develop your own comfort level (guided by federal law, experience, mentorship, and personal conviction) as to where you'll come down on any given issue. This is a long process- fraught with much self-doubt- that shouldn't be rushed. Find experienced mentors that you can turn to for advice when it comes to ethical issues. Talk things over with your peers and supervisors. In time, you'll develop your own understanding of these very murky waters. It's not easy- not by any stretch of the imagination. You'll also likely make some bad calls somewhere along the way (again, in any specialization of vet med). Self-chastisement for these errors won't help your future patients. Learn from them, and incorporate the lessons into future decisions. Always have the patient's best interest at heart.
Hope that these thoughts were helpful. I highly recommend reading some of the articles authored by Cindy Buckmaster. Cindy is a PhD at Baylor who is heavily involved in public outreach associated with research animal use. In my opinion, she is one of the great leaders of this very important charge. A two part article of hers comes to mind: 'To Slinky, with Love- parts 1 and 2." These editorials, published in the journal 'Lab Animal,' are basically a love letter to one of her research pigs, and discusses exactly the issues you raised in your post. I'll try attaching them below.
There's no great answer to your questions. No, it doesn't get easier- just more familiar. No, it's not easier as a veterinarian vs. a technician (at least not in my view- just a different side of the same coin). To last in this field long term, I believe that conviction and belief in the end goal (and your contribution to animal welfare) are absolute requirements- the 'key' to success, if you will.
Perhaps my colleague
@kcoughli has a different perspective. I'm sure that she has some wise words
🙂
Sorry that I couldn't offer any golden solution- there simply isn't one.
Best of success.