Labor epidural: Sacral sparing - how do you manage it?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

CanGas

Member
10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2006
Messages
118
Reaction score
4
Ok, I want to hear from the guru’s. How do you guys handle sacral sparing for labor epidurals?

Normal, healthy primp at term. Easy epidural placed at L3/4. 5cm to space, cath threaded to 10cm at skin. Doing beautifully for 2-3 hours until baby descends some more. Now pushing PCEA like crazy and complaining of severe rectal pain with contractions. Only 6cm dilated. Good T8-9 to L2/3 sensory block bilaterally with mild leg weakness. Clear sacral sparing with ice test.

Our infusion here is Bupi 0.06% with Fent 2mcg/ml. Background 12 ml/hr, bolus 5cc q 10min.

Can’t find much in the way of literature on the subject so I’d like to hear what you would do. I’ll say what I did later.

Members don't see this ad.
 
Draw up 10mL of 0.25% bupivicaine and squirt it in there. Problem solved.

-copro

(P.S. This is assuming that the patient has been given a good fluid bolus and that you're going to stand there for at least 15-20 minutes and watch her pressure.)
 
Ok, I want to hear from the guru's. How do you guys handle sacral sparing for labor epidurals?

Normal, healthy primp at term. Easy epidural placed at L3/4. 5cm to space, cath threaded to 10cm at skin. Doing beautifully for 2-3 hours until baby descends some more. Now pushing PCEA like crazy and complaining of severe rectal pain with contractions. Only 6cm dilated. Good T8-9 to L2/3 sensory block bilaterally with mild leg weakness. Clear sacral sparing with ice test.

Our infusion here is Bupi 0.06% with Fent 2mcg/ml. Background 12 ml/hr, bolus 5cc q 10min.

Can't find much in the way of literature on the subject so I'd like to hear what you would do. I'll say what I did later.

Sacral sparing occurs in 2nd stage of labor as I understand it. First stage of labor is T10-L1 nerve roots which innervate the Uterus, cervix, and upper vagina. For the second stage of labor, the pain is somatic and carried by the S2–S4 nerve roots, innervating the perineum.

What you are talking about (6cm dilation) is first stage therefore, not sacral sparing.
 
Last edited:
Members don't see this ad :)
yup, volume or a stronger bolus usually solves the problem. She may be "pushing the button like crazy", but its only gonna give her what the PCEA is programmed to give her based on time lockout. Sometimes you might get some sparing regardless.
 
You mean you were allowed to mess around with an ice cube down there?

LOL... probably the same time he is doing the cervical exam...
I typically don't bother retesting epidurals... if I am happy with it on my first placement then when they call to complain (or rather ask for a stat top-off)... I ask where are you feeling the pain- usually they say down below... then I usually blast in 8cc of 0.25% Bupivicaine...
 
I usually start with 0.125% with 5mcg/ml fentanyl. I give 2/3 of the dose sitting first then the last third laying down, this seems to get the sacral roots nice. However if they still get no or need more sacral coverage then I go for the 0.25% - 10cc usually does the trick, but volume loading is important.
 
I usually start with 0.125% with 5mcg/ml fentanyl. I give 2/3 of the dose sitting first then the last third laying down, this seems to get the sacral roots nice. However if they still get no or need more sacral coverage then I go for the 0.25% - 10cc usually does the trick, but volume loading is important.

keep in mind some women cannot "push" effectively if given a higher concentration of local. If I think Im going to need immediate sacral coverage, I just do a CSE with low dose local/narcotic. Otherwise I tend to use 100 of fentanyl with lower concentration local (0.1-0.125 bupi, 0.2 ropi) in a higher volume (12-14) ml.
 
Why are you guys still talking about sacral sparing when the pt is in 1st stage of labor? For the first stage of labor, the pain is largely visceral and carried by the T10 through L1 nerve roots, which innervate the cervix, uterus, and upper portion of the vagina. For the second stage of labor, the pain is somatic and carried by the S2–S4 nerve roots, innervating the perineum.
 
Why are you guys still talking about sacral sparing when the pt is in 1st stage of labor? For the first stage of labor, the pain is largely visceral and carried by the T10 through L1 nerve roots, which innervate the cervix, uterus, and upper portion of the vagina. For the second stage of labor, the pain is somatic and carried by the S2–S4 nerve roots, innervating the perineum.

I assumed they were discussing 2nd stage. although looking back at the original post it appears more likely to be one of 2 things, either baby is compressing the lumbar plexus/some other structure, or they need to do another vaginal exam.
 
Last edited:
If she's really 6 cm I'd just give 25mcg of epidural fentanyl. And I set low expectations for the patient and what she can expect as the contraction pain transitions to delivery pain.
 
Let me put this another way. This pt is 6 cm therefore, stage 1 of labor. You place the epidural anywhere from L2-3 to L4-5. The pt is complaining of pain and is in 1st stage of labor therefore the T10-L1 nerves are under attack. Your catheter was placed below this.

It ain't sacral sparing. It's an asymmetric block or a window. Pull the catheter back 1cm and bolus it.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
I would say that the baby is op. This is hard to treat. I agree that this is probably not sacral sparing. Sacral sparing is not treated with boluses of dilute LA. You end up with a fluid column of dilute LA. Suppose a stat c/s is called. What will you do? I treat sacral sparing with 50-100mcg fen followed by 3 cc .375% bupiv. If it is truly sacral sparing this just about always works.

Cambie
 
I would say that the baby is op. This is hard to treat. I agree that this is probably not sacral sparing. Sacral sparing is not treated with boluses of dilute LA. You end up with a fluid column of dilute LA. Suppose a stat c/s is called. What will you do? I treat sacral sparing with 50-100mcg fen followed by 3 cc .375% bupiv. If it is truly sacral sparing this just about always works.

Cambie

I agree but I usually dont use the narcs. I usually use 5cc of .5% bupiv.
 
Good set of comments.

So first of all I am not certain what the correct definition of sacral sparring is. I did not realize it ONLY refers to the 2nd stage, I always figured it was simply that you are not covering the sacral plexus.

I did not place the epidural. It was placed by the day staff at L3/4 5cm into the epidural space. Worked great from 3cm to 6cm but then alot of rectal pain and pressure. Subsequent exam by OBGYN showed OP presentation.

Dermatoms were tested with ICE as described. T8-9 to L2/3 sensory block bilaterally with mild leg weakness. Since I had her on the side to pull back the cath anyways I used ICE to show lack of block from L5-S3. NO I did not go to S5! (While I always document dermatomes for failed epidurals (how hard is it to run ICE down both sides?) , I do not test sacral dermatomes ever, just did it as a teaching point for a junior resident on with me). Noyac, what would you call this? Blocked T8-L3 but severe pain in ass? Sounds like missing sacral plexus to me.

Anyways, pulled the cath back 2 cm so that it was 3 cm in the space. Bolused with 10cc Bup 0.1% and 50mcg fentanyl. Increased background rate on PCEA from 12cc/hr to 14cc/hr. Worked great.

Spoke to some of the OLD guys the next day for their opinion and most said similar strategies to what was described in posts here. Larger volumes, narcotics (with understanding that it is still really just like giving IV). One guy who used to be a GP said that pudental nerve blocks work great for this but that it is a dying technique among the newer grads of OBGYN and it's hard to find one who will do them. He said in these situations he sometimes puts in a spinal with 4mg Bup 0.75% with the patient in the sitting position to give a sacral block.

Anyways, just thought it was an interesting problem with little in the literature to support one technique over another.

CanGas

Let me put this another way. This pt is 6 cm therefore, stage 1 of labor. You place the epidural anywhere from L2-3 to L4-5. The pt is complaining of pain and is in 1st stage of labor therefore the T10-L1 nerves are under attack. Your catheter was placed below this.

It ain't sacral sparing. It's an asymmetric block or a window. Pull the catheter back 1cm and bolus it.
 
I think you are dealing with and OP presentation and a pt that has a lot of pressure (rectal) from this. The fact that your bolus worked tells me either that the fentanyl is what she needed or that the local reached the involved nerves which are unlikely to be sacral since it is hard to cover these sacral roots with an epidural bolus that missed them in the first place. Also pulling back the catheter is the right move for this situation which I call asymmetric analgesia. If that doesn't work for me then I give them IV meds of the OB's choice.
That would be my description.
 
One suggestion about using additional epidural fentanyl .
IF the pt had an epidural with a fentanyl in the infusion bag ( 2mcg /ml). This patient is already getting 30-40 ( 10cc/hr of infusion + pt boluses) mcg of fentanyl per hr. Any additional fentanyl wont have any epidural receptors to act. It would be more prudent to give it IV rather than epidural.

Secondly , the purpose of combining fentanyl with bupi. is to decrease the MLAC of bupivacaine. So again adding more fentanyl may not be the solution.

Many a times just sitting up the patient and giving a blous dose with plain bupi may work.
 
One suggestion about using additional epidural fentanyl .
IF the pt had an epidural with a fentanyl in the infusion bag ( 2mcg /ml). This patient is already getting 30-40 ( 10cc/hr of infusion + pt boluses) mcg of fentanyl per hr. Any additional fentanyl wont have any epidural receptors to act. It would be more prudent to give it IV rather than epidural.

Is there any data that supports your statement?
Is giving 30-40 Mcg/hr Fentanyl going to saturate all the opiate receptors in the spinal cord and nerve roots??
 
One suggestion about using additional epidural fentanyl .
IF the pt had an epidural with a fentanyl in the infusion bag ( 2mcg /ml). This patient is already getting 30-40 ( 10cc/hr of infusion + pt boluses) mcg of fentanyl per hr. Any additional fentanyl wont have any epidural receptors to act. It would be more prudent to give it IV rather than epidural.

Secondly , the purpose of combining fentanyl with bupi. is to decrease the MLAC of bupivacaine. So again adding more fentanyl may not be the solution.

Many a times just sitting up the patient and giving a blous dose with plain bupi may work.

Is giving epidural fentanyl any different than giving IV fentanyl?😉
 
Probably not. There are studies that show the plasma concentrations are the same whether given epidural or intravascular.

But, I can tell you that intrathecal fentanyl is a lot different.

-copro
 
Probably not. There are studies that show the plasma concentrations are the same whether given epidural or intravascular.

But, I can tell you that intrathecal fentanyl is a lot different.

-copro

Really?

I haven't seen any difference that I can put my finger on.
 
Really?

I haven't seen any difference that I can put my finger on.

Given intrathecally, I think you are going right to the site of action. If you give 20mcg of IV fentanyl, it's basically not going to do jack when they mobilize the uterus. However, intrathecally they hardly budge when they externalize. If you don't use any fentanyl, they are phenomenally uncomfortable when they externalize the uterus.

Just my experience.

-copro
 
I missed the fact that we were talking IT vs IV.

Epidural vs IV = same thing

May not be quite true..... from my short experience , i think there is some difference for sure.

Also remeber that epidural fentanyl dramtically reduces the MLAC of epidural fentanyl.

In c-section, epidural fentanyl does provide few other benefits like , better relaxation ( may correspond to a denser block) and faster onset.
 
Is there any data that supports your statement?
Is giving 30-40 Mcg/hr Fentanyl going to saturate all the opiate receptors in the spinal cord and nerve roots??

I have read something similar somewhere . I will try to get the reference for you. ( Please note : this saturation is usually seen in infusion for many hours)
 
May not be quite true..... from my short experience , i think there is some difference for sure.

Also remeber that epidural fentanyl dramtically reduces the MLAC of epidural fentanyl.

In c-section, epidural fentanyl does provide few other benefits like , better relaxation ( may correspond to a denser block) and faster onset.

I agree that epidural Fentanyl is not the same as IV Fentanyl.
I have done countless epidural infusions using Fentanyl only and the analgesia is definitely superior to IV Narcotics.
 
And I have noticed that the Fentanyl patch works as well as epidural fentanyl.

Does any of this mean anything that we can say with certainty?
 
out of curiosity, in what context was the fentanyl patch compared to epidural fentanyl? I figured it takes too long to kick in to be useful in labor.
 
out of curiosity, in what context was the fentanyl patch compared to epidural fentanyl? I figured it takes too long to kick in to be useful in labor.

The fentanyl patch takes a long time to kick in, 8hrs maybe more.

I used it in pectus repairs. Thoracic epidural over night patch in the morning and pull the epidural that afternoon.
 
We never use fentanyl patch for acute pain. Most common use in our set up is for chronic pain.
 
The fentanyl patch takes a long time to kick in, 8hrs maybe more.

I used it in pectus repairs. Thoracic epidural over night patch in the morning and pull the epidural that afternoon.




You should read the package insert....it says in BIG BOLD letters that transdermal fentanyl is ABSOLUTELY CONTRAINDICATED in acute pain. You can really get in big trouble especially when using it in the opioid naive. Even the reps are very clear that you should not use it for acute pain. You should rethink your strategy. Almost all of the patients who die from transdermal fentanyl are opioid naive.
 
You should read the package insert....it says in BIG BOLD letters that transdermal fentanyl is NOT indicated in acute pain. You can really get in big trouble especially when using it in the opioid naive. Even the reps are very clear that you should not use it for acute pain. You should rethink your strategy. Almost all of the patients who die from transdermal fentanyl are opioid naive.

It is not for acute pain b/c it takes too long to kick in. I did not remove the epidural until the fentanyl was working.

These pts were monitored in an ICU or TCU setting.

Do you use every medicine you give strictly by the recommendations on the package insert?

As we all know, as physicians use medications in ways that the manufacturer does not recommend. I remember when propofol was not recommended for peds but we used it all the time.
 
It is not for acute pain b/c it takes too long to kick in. I did not remove the epidural until the fentanyl was working.

These pts were monitored in an ICU or TCU setting.

Do you use every medicine you give strictly by the recommendations on the package insert?

As we all know, as physicians use medications in ways that the manufacturer does not recommend. I remember when propofol was not recommended for peds but we used it all the time.




All of us use drugs off label. Classic examples in my field include lyrica and neurontin for radiculopathy. But remember lyrica and neurontin are not recommended for radiculopathy only because they have not been studied in these populations. Fentanyl is contraindicated in acute pain because people have died. I am sure that you can appreciate the difference here.

Nearly every patient that you treat in the postop period is being treated for acute nociceptive pain. Therefore a fentanyl patch has little utility for a non-pain anesthesiologist. I am not trying to be an a s s h o l e, but people do die from fentanyl usage in opioid naive patients by well meaning physicians. If you dont believe me ask your local duragesic rep.
 
I'm surprised no one has mentioned it.

If you have "sacral sparing" or whatever you want to call it that is refractory to LA bolus, I'd replace the catheter. Almost always is an improvement and if they have a good block, it won't hurt!

BNE
 
I'm surprised no one has mentioned it.

If you have "sacral sparing" or whatever you want to call it that is refractory to LA bolus, I'd replace the catheter. Almost always is an improvement and if they have a good block, it won't hurt!

BNE

No one mentioned it because it is too obvious and too simple, we don't like that around here 😀
 
All of us use drugs off label. Classic examples in my field include lyrica and neurontin for radiculopathy. But remember lyrica and neurontin are not recommended for radiculopathy only because they have not been studied in these populations. Fentanyl is contraindicated in acute pain because people have died. I am sure that you can appreciate the difference here.

Nearly every patient that you treat in the postop period is being treated for acute nociceptive pain. Therefore a fentanyl patch has little utility for a non-pain anesthesiologist. I am not trying to be an a s s h o l e, but people do die from fentanyl usage in opioid naive patients by well meaning physicians. If you dont believe me ask your local duragesic rep.

How many of these people that died were in the ICU/TCU? I didn't send these pts home with the patch.

When a pt gets over sedated on the floor many physicians will escalate their care by admitting them to the ICU/TCU. My pts were already there.

Tell me mille, why is it not recommended for acute pain? Because it takes too long to take effect! NOt because people die from it. I know people can die from it just like they have died from PCA's. But the setting I used it in was the safest way.
 
Please read for your own edification...I am not going to say anymore....if you want to prescribe against an obvious contraindication be my guess. You can no longer use ignorance as an excuse..This excerpt is from the package insert.



DURAGESIC® (fentanyl transdermal system) CII contains a high concentration of a potent Schedule II opioid agonist, fentanyl. Schedule II opioid substances which include fentanyl, hydromorphone, methadone, morphine, oxycodone, and oxymorphone have the highest potential for abuse and associated risk of fatal overdose due to respiratory depression. Fentanyl can be abused and is subject to criminal diversion. The high content of fentanyl in the patches (DURAGESIC®) may be a particular target for abuse and diversion.

DURAGESIC® is indicated for management of persistent, moderate to severe chronic pain that:

Requires continuous, around-the-clock opioid administration for an extended period of time, and
Cannot be managed by other means such as nonsteroidal analgesics, opioid combination products, or immediate-release opioids
DURAGESIC® should ONLY be used in patients who are already receiving opioid therapy, who have demonstrated opioid tolerance, and who require a total daily dose at least equivalent to DURAGESIC® 25 mcg/hr. Patients who are considered opioid-tolerant are those who have been taking, for a week or longer, at least 60 mg of morphine daily, or at least 30 mg of oral oxycodone daily, or at least 8 mg of oral hydromorphone daily or an equianalgesic dose of another opioid.

Because serious or life-threatening hypoventilation could occur, DURAGESIC® is contraindicated:

In patients who are not opioid-tolerant
In the management of acute pain or in patients who require opioid analgesia for a short period of time
In the management of postoperative pain, including use after outpatient or day surgeries (e.g., tonsillectomies)
In the management of mild pain
In the management of intermittent pain (e.g., use on an as needed basis [p.r.n.])
(See CONTRAINDICATIONS section of the full Prescribing Information for further information.)

Since the peak fentanyl levels occur between 24 and 72 hours of treatment, prescribers should be aware that serious or life-threatening hypoventilation may occur, even in opioid-tolerant patients, during the initial application period.

The concomitant use of DURAGESIC® with all cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors such as (ritonavir, ketoconazole, itraconazole, troleandomycin, clarithromycin, nelfinavir, nefazodone, amiodarone, amprenavir, aprepitant diltazem, erythrocin, fluconazole, fosamprenavir, grapefruit juice, and verapamil) may result in an increase in fentanyl plasma concentrations, which could increase or prolong adverse drug effects and may cause potentially fatal respiratory depression. Patients receiving DURAGESIC® and any CYP3A4 inhibitors should be carefully monitored for an extended period of time and dosage adjustments should be made if warranted. (See CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY-Drug Interactions, WARNINGS, PRECAUTIONS, and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION sections of the full Prescribing Information for further information.)

The safety of DURAGESIC® has not been established in children under 2 years of age. DURAGESIC® should be administered to children only if they are opioid-tolerant and 2 years of age or older. (See PRECAUTIONS - Pediatric Use section of the full Prescribing Information.)

DURAGESIC® is ONLY for use in patients who are already tolerant to opioid therapy of comparable potency. Use in non-opioid tolerant patients may lead to fatal respiratory depression. Overestimating the DURAGESIC® dose when converting patients from another opioid medication can result in fatal overdose with the first dose. Due to the mean elimination half-life of 17 hours of DURAGESIC®, patients who are thought to have had a serious adverse event, including overdose, will require monitoring and treatment for at least 24 hours.

DURAGESIC® can be abused in a manner similar to other opioid agonists, legal or illicit. This risk should be considered when administering, prescribing, or dispensing DURAGESIC® in situations where the healthcare professional is concerned about increased risk of misuse, abuse, or diversion.

Persons at increased risk for opioid abuse include those with a personal or family history of substance abuse (including drug or alcohol abuse or addiction) or mental illness (e.g., major depression). Patients should be assessed for their clinical risks for opioid abuse or addiction prior to being prescribed opioids. All patients receiving opioids should be routinely monitored for signs of misuse, abuse, and addiction. Patients at increased risk of opioid abuse may still be appropriately treated with modified-release opioid formulations; however, these patients will require intensive monitoring for signs of misuse, abuse, or addiction.

DURAGESIC® patches are intended for transdermal use (on intact skin) only. Do not use a DURAGESIC® patch if the seal is broken or the patch is cut, damaged, or changed in any way. Using a patch that is cut, damaged, or changed in any way can expose the patient or caregiver to the contents of the patch, which can result in an overdose of fentanyl that may be fatal.

Avoid exposing the DURAGESIC® application site and surrounding area to direct external heat sources such as heating pads or electric blankets, heat or tanning lamps saunas, hot tubs and heated water beds while wearing the system. Avoid taking hot baths or sunbathing. There is a potential for temperature-dependant increases in fentanyl released from the system resulting in possible overdose and death. Patients wearing DURAGESIC® systems who develop fever or increased core body temperature due to strenuous exertion should be monitored for opioid side effects and the DURAGESIC® dose should be adjusted if necessary.
 
Dude, do you use droperidol? If you had it would you be afraid to use it? Or do you not practice in the OR any longer?

And my dog was sent home on it after an ACL repair. She did fine as well and she has never taken any narcotics.😍

I'll tell you one more time, these pts were in an ICU setting and had constant monitoring and nursing care. Any apnea would be detected.

The reason I brought it up was as a correlation in the discussion of IV vs epidural fentany. I learned it's use from a pediatric surgeon that had been doing it for years in pectus repairs. I doubted him and he proved me wrong.

Do you follow the recommendations of every package insert to every drug you use? Are you not a physician? I understand fully what you are saying and I am telling you that it can be used safely in narcotic naive pts, IN THE RIGHT SETTING.
 
Dude, do you use droperidol? If you had it would you be afraid to use it? Or do you not practice in the OR any longer?

And my dog was sent home on it after an ACL repair. She did fine as well and she has never taken any narcotics.😍

I'll tell you one more time, these pts were in an ICU setting and had constant monitoring and nursing care. Any apnea would be detected.

The reason I brought it up was as a correlation in the discussion of IV vs epidural fentany. I learned it's use from a pediatric surgeon that had been doing it for years in pectus repairs. I doubted him and he proved me wrong.

Do you follow the recommendations of every package insert to every drug you use? Are you not a physician?
I understand fully what you are saying and I am telling you that it can be used safely in narcotic naive pts, IN THE RIGHT SETTING.





Again I do use medications off label but if there is a know contraindication, I will usually not use the drug in that scenario (like most prudent physicians).


For example:

Celebrex is contraindicated in aspirin allergy.
Meperidine and ephedrine are contraindicated with MAO inhibitors.
Thiopental is contraindicated in porphyuria.


Choosing to follow these guidelines does not make you less of a physician or a paraprofessional. If a patient avoids significant morbidity and mortality even in the face of ignoring a contraindication, that does not make you a good physician.


Lets agree to disagree and put this argument to rest. If you feel that you need to get in the last word then by all means proceed.
 
I'm surprised no one has mentioned it.

If you have "sacral sparing" or whatever you want to call it that is refractory to LA bolus, I'd replace the catheter. Almost always is an improvement and if they have a good block, it won't hurt!

BNE

I would not replace an epidural that is working. Sacral sparing exist. I treat it all the time. Also,if a baby is op changing the epidural will not reduce the moms pain. We are not referring to a patchy epidural, that is a completely different story.

Cambie
 
For example:

Celebrex is contraindicated in aspirin allergy.
Meperidine and ephedrine are contraindicated with MAO inhibitors.
Thiopental is contraindicated in porphyuria.

If a patient avoids significant morbidity and mortality even in the face of ignoring a contraindication, that does not make you a good physician.

Sorry mille but you are wrong here; off label does not equate contraindication!
How is a fentanyl patch on an ICU patient more dangerous than a PCA on the floor with one nurse for 30 patients 😕

As Noyac said in the right setting there is a place for fent patches even if it's not a conventional approach.
 
Sorry mille but you are wrong here; off label does not equate contraindication!How is a fentanyl patch on an ICU patient more dangerous than a PCA on the floor with one nurse for 30 patients 😕

As Noyac said in the right setting there is a place for fent patches even if it's not a conventional approach.



You are saying that I am wrong but then you are repeating what I have been saying throughout this whole thread, 😕 I agree off label usage does not equate to a contraindication. I have used ondansetron for relief of pruritus after epidural/spinal opioids. I have used neurontin for treatment of radiculopathy. This is off label. I get it and I agree.


If a drug is contraindicated that is a different story. I would not use thiopental on an acute porphyic. I would not use celebrex in a patient with a real documented aspirin allergy. Duragesic patches are contraindicated in acute and postop pain. Why? Because patients have died due to errors in titration. The manufacturer will tell you this and discourages its usage. Why use it in this setting when there are equal alternatives (ie oxycodone, hydrocodone, etc). How would you defend yourself if something bad happens? Why take the risk? This is what I dont understand.
 
Sorry mille but you are wrong here; off label does not equate contraindication!
How is a fentanyl patch on an ICU patient more dangerous than a PCA on the floor with one nurse for 30 patients 😕
As Noyac said in the right setting there is a place for fent patches even if it's not a conventional approach.

Very very few patients have adverse effects from PCA if only the patient is allowed to "push the button" and there is no background continuous infusion.
 
Top