- Joined
- May 31, 2001
- Messages
- 1,059
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 4,531
- Attending Physician
Wow... no wonder these forums are so full of doom and gloom! So many cynics! I'm just trying to share what I believe to be a great story regarding an anesthesiologist on an anesthesiology forum! We've been owning Land Rovers for years and continue to endorse the marque because I genuinely believe the build quality of RR saved my father's life! The CHP told my mother as she claimed the vehicle on the roadside that RR have the best outcomes of all the SUV roll over accidents they respond to.
I rarely post on these forums... now I remember why!
considering that 2 out of your total of 6 posts are here, i wouldn't call it a rarity.
there are NO documented crash tests results from institute of highway safety for ANY of these vehicles. however in consumer reports avoidance maneuver the LR2 dangerously lifted TWO tires off the road - very dangerous and predictive of a flip over, which is why they did NOT recommend this vehicle (LR2) (along with DISMAL reliability and the LOWEST score possible in the category).
the range rover sport gets 9 miles a gallon (again cr tests) in the city - that's pretty irresponsible.
are these cars fun? to some.
are some of them (defender) amazing off road? absolutely.
are they practical, reliable, etc? not when compared to other available options.
