- Joined
- Jun 23, 2003
- Messages
- 5,786
- Reaction score
- 913
Does anyone know of any texts/books that look at personality disorders and some of the defense mechanisms from more of a learning-cognitive approach? It seems essentially that, from what little psychodynamic stuff I have read so far, many of the maladaptive patterns seen in many PDs result from adaptive behvaiors/defenses/perception early in life which, in a certain environment were adaptive, but then get cemented and overgeneralized into environments and onto people where it is not appropriate or adaptive. My gist in reading some psychodynamic stuff is that these books sort of allude to this concept but it's mask with a lot of jargon. An example would be the concept of projection. We're taught that it represents an unwanted desire or impulse that is unconsciously split off from the individual and gets projected onto someone else. While I buy this concept in certain situations (such as accusing a friend of being too tired to go out with a group when you're the one who actually doesn't want to go, although this seems to be more conscious than anything) how it's applied in PD's doesn't really make sense, and I wonder how they can even postulate something like this? It seems more appropriate that they are treating someone who fits a previous archetype a certain way because it used to be adaptive but it no longer is. I completely realize that this is the basis of transference, but that system seems to approach it much less cognitively.
I feel like psych training is missing some of the important concepts and areas that I studied in undergrad psych. Any thoughts? (Please keep in mind we do not start ANY therapy/psychodynamic anything until PGY3 so I have very little exposure)
Also, it seems that a rudimentary understanding of social psychology would greatly benefit clinical practice. I have lost count of how many times I have seen attending psychiatrists make rash decisions based upon dispositional attribution errors.
Anyways, I'm rambling out loud now so I will stop.
I feel like psych training is missing some of the important concepts and areas that I studied in undergrad psych. Any thoughts? (Please keep in mind we do not start ANY therapy/psychodynamic anything until PGY3 so I have very little exposure)
Also, it seems that a rudimentary understanding of social psychology would greatly benefit clinical practice. I have lost count of how many times I have seen attending psychiatrists make rash decisions based upon dispositional attribution errors.
Anyways, I'm rambling out loud now so I will stop.
Last edited: