Least Vulnerable Specialties To Midlevel Encroachment?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
D

Detective SnowBucket

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2017
Messages
1,544
Reaction score
2,214
Maybe I'm spending too much time on reddit, but who cares, I'm on spring break.
Anyways, I'm really getting spooked by the amount of bills popping up in state legislatures for independent practice and the amount of state that actually pass them! I'd like to hear your thoughts on the least vulnerable specialties, as specific as you can be. I have a specialty I'm most interested in but I want to see if you'll list it as (non-)vulnerable without prompting.
Members don't see this ad.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Dr. Venture Capitalist said:
I think this has been discus before. But I will start

least
1. Rads
2. Path
3. Most Surgical Specialties

Anything take requires a lot of knowledge and pays is low may also be save nepro, endo, rheumatoid
Click to expand...
Pathology assistants are pretty busy in a lot of places ....
 
detritus said:
I admittedly don’t know very much about this topic as a first year med student but I personally wouldn’t pick a specialty based on my perception of how much NP and PAs are involved. At this point they’re involved in every specialty of medicine and although we should fight independent practice laws, the laws will not change that many practices and academic centers will rely on NPs and PAs to increase productivity. I’m in the camp of pick something that you want to wake up and do everyday. In that sense the “most protected” specialties are actually quite different aside from the surgical specialties.
Click to expand...
You're exactly right. I went about this the other way. I know what I'm interested in and I specifically don't say what it is in this post to see what people's opinions are before they know what I'm going for to see if they mention it.
 
Dr. Venture Capitalist said:
I think this has been discus before. But I will start

least
1. Rads
2. Path
3. Most Surgical Specialties

Anything take requires a lot of knowledge and pays is low may also be save nepro, endo, rheumatoid
Click to expand...
For the surgical specialties, what makes one more/less vulnerable compared to others? For path is it because of the difficulty of the subject, the lack of "b.llsh.t-ability" in that you can't pass off lack of knowledge like DR or that it's not sexy? For rads, are you saying IR or DR or no difference?
 
Hey you guys - Pain Doctor here, was scrolling by and saw this post, and figured I knew what the question was about.

This is absolutely a legitimate worry to have. Also, look for specialties where you still have a shot of private practice, so you're not basically forced into an employment model by hospitals or private equity employment. Sounds convenient to just collect a paycheck, but its miserable when you're basically seeing your pay constantly threatened, go down, or see midlevel encroachment for cheaper value.

I got super lucky in retrospect, and didn't even think of this through. Looking back now, I am lucky. I did PM&R and then Interventional Pain. Midlevels can't do our procedures, especially minimally invasive procedures like Spinal Cord Stimulators, SI Joint Fusions, Vertiflex, DRG, Radiofrequency Ablation, etc. On top of that, we're one of the few specialties where most are still private practice and we have a great opportunity to still own our own practice (probably with a partner). So I would definitely look into that.
 
detritus said:
I admittedly don’t know very much about this topic as a first year med student but I personally wouldn’t pick a specialty based on my perception of how much NP and PAs are involved. At this point they’re involved in every specialty of medicine and although we should fight independent practice laws, the laws will not change that many practices and academic centers will rely on NPs and PAs to increase productivity. I’m in the camp of pick something that you want to wake up and do everyday. In that sense the “most protected” specialties are actually quite different aside from the surgical specialties.
Click to expand...
What has pushed me away from multiple specialties even though I would love to wake up and do the actual specialty- is that I would not love to wake up and watch others do the specialty, forcibly oversee them to make my overlord some money, be their liability sponge, and do certain/complex cases of the specialty.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Cath Up said:
orthopedic surgery
ENT
surgical oncology
IR
colorectal surgery
neurosurgery
ophthalmology
urology
OBGYN
plastic surgery
trauma surgery
vascular surgery
rocket surgery
general surgery
pediatric surgery anything
Click to expand...
what are your thoughts on the post above yours? Saying that midlevel's have been witnessed in the wild performing some IR procedures
 
DrSpine said:
Hey you guys - Pain Doctor here, was scrolling by and saw this post, and figured I knew what the question was about.

This is absolutely a legitimate worry to have. Also, look for specialties where you still have a shot of private practice, so you're not basically forced into an employment model by hospitals or private equity employment. Sounds convenient to just collect a paycheck, but its miserable when you're basically seeing your pay constantly threatened, go down, or see midlevel encroachment for cheaper value.

I got super lucky in retrospect, and didn't even think of this through. Looking back now, I am lucky. I did PM&R and then Interventional Pain. Midlevels can't do our procedures, especially minimally invasive procedures like Spinal Cord Stimulators, SI Joint Fusions, Vertiflex, DRG, Radiofrequency Ablation, etc. On top of that, we're one of the few specialties where most are still private practice and we have a great opportunity to still own our own practice (probably with a partner). So I would definitely look into that
Click to expand...
Isn’t pain pretty saturated market?
 
Detective SnowBucket said:
what are your thoughts on the post above yours? Saying that midlevel's have been witnessed in the wild performing some IR procedures
Click to expand...
I have seen midlevels doing piccs, paras, thoras, chest tubes in IR and some other stuff like that. This is all stuff that I did as a 3rd year med student as well. Many hospitals have a picc line team that is RNs so I'm not worried about an IR midlevel doing this. At least the rads department can bill and claim rvus instead of the hospital taking the whole pie.
 
MissRibeye said:
What about neurology?
Click to expand...
It's protected and will be even more protected in the future with all the exciting new treatments coming out all the time. It's like a less accessible rheumatology to midlevels.

These are just too tedious and pedantic for midlevels. You can't monkey see, monkey do something easily that confuses even other physicians.
 
SweetBurger said:
everyone mentioning rads is safe... yeah safe from NP/PA not from A.I. lmao
Click to expand...
Rads more difficult that it appears. It will a long time until AI can read a MRI as good as a physician. but sure AI is a threat. But the threat is in the future.

NP/PA are a threat now. And it will only get worse
 
SweetBurger said:
everyone mentioning rads is safe... yeah safe from NP/PA not from A.I. lmao
Click to expand...
The Rock Reaction GIF by WWE
 
Dr. Venture Capitalist said:
Rads more difficult that it appears. It will a long time until AI can read a MRI as good as a physician. but sure AI is a threat. But the threat is in the future.

NP/PA are a threat now. And it will only get worse
Click to expand...
i agree.
was meme'ing
 
Neopolymath said:
It's protected and will be even more protected in the future with all the exciting new treatments coming out all the time. It's like a less accessible rheumatology to midlevels.

These are just too tedious and pedantic for midlevels. You can't monkey see, monkey do something easily that confuses even other physicians.
Click to expand...
I thought this as well until I did my neuro rotation during 4th year. At least at my hospital, there are PLENTY of PAs running around pretending to be neurologists. Including reading MRIs and dictating orders IN THE NEURO ICU without any physician oversight.
 
AnatomyGrey12 said:
Anything surgical.

Even basic bread and butter cases are simple, until they aren’t.
Click to expand...

Until they start creating PA/NP surgical "residencies" and forcing surgeons to train them at academic centers while pumping funds into forcing these independent practice bills through.

I would have said surgery in the past, but I've seen that there is truly no limit to the greed of these independent midlevels, the physicians training them, and the hospitals employing them. They just can't be underestimated.
 
Captain_Falcon said:
Because just like medicine midlevels are taking over SDN without any oversight


Jk. Kinda
Click to expand...

I don't disagree with the cause. I think it's a systemic problem that needs to be pointed out. It's not just a few bad actors. I just feel like it's the similar to MD v. DO in pre-allo in that everyone's said their bit and we just keep rehashing things. A dedicated subforum, sticky, etc. would probably create a more focused discussion. I'd rather see threads for people who're looking for advice in training, etc. It seems like all anyone wants to talk about on SDN-Medical Students is midlevel encroachment or some version of which field offers XYZ. Maybe I'm biased because I'd rather talk about medical education policy, clinical reasoning, clinical ward tips, etc. and those are starting to disappear.
 
Last edited:
BacktotheBasics said:
I don't disagree with the cause. I think it's a systemic problem that needs to be pointed out. It's not just a few bad actors. I just feel like it's the same as MD v. DO in pre-allo. Everyone's said their bit and we just keep rehashing things. A dedicated subforum, sticky, etc. would probably create a more focused discussion. I'd rather see threads for people who're looking for advice in training, etc. It seems like all anyone wants to talk about on SDN-Medical Students is midlevel encroachment or some version of which field offers XYZ. Maybe I'm biased because I'd rather talk about medical education policy, clinical reasoning, clinical ward tips, etc.
Click to expand...
I agree, and that's with me wanting to go into a field that is very susceptible to midlevel scope creep
 
Jack Donaghy said:
I thought this as well until I did my neuro rotation during 4th year. At least at my hospital, there are PLENTY of PAs running around pretending to be neurologists. Including reading MRIs and dictating orders IN THE NEURO ICU without any physician oversight.
Click to expand...
So just to clarify, you are saying at your institution that the intensivist or the neurologist are not supervising these midlevels and they are working independently? That's definitely an outlier, if so.

If you told me they are being "supervised" but not really then I would say it's typical morally bankrupt behavior from some boomer attending at play here.

Neuro and rheum are typically "we have no idea what to do with this patient" destinations so I still maintain that PAs aren't going to be taking over the movement disorder clinic, epilepsy clinic etc etc.

I have a pretty pessimistic view of midlevels and their path of destruction on medicine but I'm more bullish regarding their ability to fake it in the neuro clinic than in the pulm clinic for example. I need to expand on this post more when I have some time.

I will say this: Pcps order mri and emg and whatever all the time and neurologists didn't disappear due to that. They aren't gonna disappear from midlevels who don't even know most neuro diseases.
 
slowthai said:
Until they start creating PA/NP surgical "residencies" and forcing surgeons to train them at academic centers while pumping funds into forcing these independent practice bills through.

I would have said surgery in the past, but I've seen that there is truly no limit to the greed of these independent midlevels, the physicians training them, and the hospitals employing them. They just can't be underestimated.
Click to expand...
I’m sure they think they can pull it off, but I have zero concerns. The first time they get into bleeding will be the last time they think they can do what a surgeon does.
 
slowthai said:
Until they start creating PA/NP surgical "residencies" and forcing surgeons to train them at academic centers while pumping funds into forcing these independent practice bills through.

I would have said surgery in the past, but I've seen that there is truly no limit to the greed of these independent midlevels, the physicians training them, and the hospitals employing them. They just can't be underestimated.
Click to expand...
Let them. Won’t matter. Learning surgery is not an issue with credentials or length of training, it’s actual time in the operating room and your own proficiency with learning the skills. It’s why you can’t really shave off more years from surgical training. At best we could get gen surg down to four and fold the other specialties into an I6 sort of model but it will never get shorter than that, and you’ll still need 800+ operations and 70 hour work weeks for 52+ weeks to accomplish it. Your credentials will never change that no matter how hard you try.

Besides, AG is right. The next time you’re in the OR count how many cases the surgeon *doesn’t* say “this is harder than normal” “this is stickier than normal” “this is more inflamed than normal” “this is really oozy, is this guy on Coumadin and we forgot to hold it (for a 40 y/o athlete)” “this anatomy is not right” “why is this one so fat compared to normal”

I can count on one hand how many times in a month someone says “that was straightforward”. The normal routine case is the unicorn and normal is a lie we tell ourselves to justify it taking the extra hour it always does.
 
Lem0nz said:
Let them. Won’t matter. Learning surgery is not an issue with credentials or length of training, it’s actual time in the operating room and your own proficiency with learning the skills. It’s why you can’t really shave off more years from surgical training. At best we could get gen surg down to four and fold the other specialties into an I6 sort of model but it will never get shorter than that, and you’ll still need 800+ operations and 70 hour work weeks for 52+ weeks to accomplish it. Your credentials will never change that no matter how hard you try.

Besides, AG is right. The next time you’re in the OR count how many cases the surgeon *doesn’t* say “this is harder than normal” “this is stickier than normal” “this is more inflamed than normal” “this is really oozy, is this guy on Coumadin and we forgot to hold it (for a 40 y/o athlete)” “this anatomy is not right” “why is this one so fat compared to normal”

I can count on one hand how many times in a month someone says “that was straightforward”. The normal routine case is the unicorn and normal is a lie we tell ourselves to justify it taking the extra hour it always does.
Click to expand...

Are you saying that even if this training is available for them that they won't be willing to do it due to the sheer intensity of it?
 
slowthai said:
Are you saying that even if this training is available for them that they won't be willing to do it due to the sheer intensity of it?
Click to expand...
I don’t know if you’re using sarcasm at all (and if you are, then this comment is pretty pointless.) But ask every single PA or NP why they chose to go into their respective role. 95% of the time, it will be about not spending a ton of time in the hospital like the residents (and attendings.) Bonus if they bring up wanting a family.
 
FutureSurgical said:
I don’t know if you’re using sarcasm at all (and if you are, then this comment is pretty pointless.) But ask every single PA or NP why they chose going into their respective role. 95% of the time, it will be about not spending a ton of time in the hospital like the residents (and attendings.) Bonus if they bring up wanting a family.
Click to expand...

I wasn't being sarcastic. That's true.
 
slowthai said:
Are you saying that even if this training is available for them that they won't be willing to do it due to the sheer intensity of it?
Click to expand...
Yes. It's a group of people defined by taking shortcuts or making career decisions to avoid the extra work and responsibility that is undesirable (for the ethical ones out there that do exist). Surgery goes against the point of being a midlevel.
 
slowthai said:
Are you saying that even if this training is available for them that they won't be willing to do it due to the sheer intensity of it?
Click to expand...
Yes. What is the point of taking that route even if it existed? You'll get paid less than any general surgeon unless you're PP but I think the vast majority of new grads are gravitating towards employed models so a midlevel in that world would make less than a surgeon for the same amount of work, AND the same amount of education. There's zero reason to do any of that. They can make a very comfortable salary in the 150s, even low 200s, being a PA for a CT surgeon and harvesting veins and closing sternums with less hours, no malpractice, and its still a really cool exciting job.
 
7331poas said:
Or alternatively, you can close your eyes. Both stop you from engaging in this thread, but my option stops you from preventing our discussion.
Click to expand...
I'm in the minority but I don't think it's a particularly fruitful topic and all it seems to do is generate frustration.
 
I think it’s kind of pointless to try and project these things or to base a career choice of it.

Even if it’s not encroachment you could always worry about AI automation, poor job market (look at EM now), physician salary slashes.

I could worry sick about it or I could just do my best to focus on what I can control.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

booniesdoc
Specialties ranked in order from most intense residency to least
Replies
23
Views
10K
LucidSplash
LucidSplash
M
Least conservative/traditional specialties?
Replies
39
Views
4K
PathNeuroIMorFM
PathNeuroIMorFM
D
What matters for applying to competitive specialties/programs (and how much are they each weighed)
Replies
9
Views
2K
Dral
Dral
V
Surgery and surgical sub specialties are poised to become a lot more competitive (likely due to AI fears)
2
Replies
61
Views
5K
hopefulraddaddypls
H
D
How common are research years becoming for comp specialties
Replies
2
Views
927
deleted1199414
D
Top