Tons of options:
- It actually sounds like you "might" be happy in academia, but would want a more research-focused place. Whether you would be competitive for those positions I do not know but they certainly exist. This would also likely mitigate the pay issue. I'm not sure I know anyone in an AMC research position earning less than 100k. Which isn't fabulously wealthy, but I'm guessing is far better than a teaching institution.
- A lot also depends on your background/interests/skills. Assessment/psychometrics? Digital interventions? Psychophysiology? Psych epidemiology? You could work for testing companies, RAND/RTI or similar, government research job (CDC, state health dept), government administrative job (NIH Program Official, FDA), one of umpteen mhealth startups, one of umpteen "we made an EHR interface tool thing-y" startups, journalism science writing, professional grant writing agencies, you can step into professional research roles as a lab manager that may or may not pay more than a teaching institute (i.e., my post-doc makes 60k, we have PhD level "lab managers" make 70-80k at entry that can escalate to 100k+ with experience). AMCs hire comical amounts of admin support staff to support the burgeoning bureaucracy and whims of leadership. The list goes on.
Can take some time to weave your way into these roles, but , if you have diverse interests, a foundational skillset and a willingness to learn the options are out there. People get too locked into the "clinician or professor" dichotomy in this field.