As much as I hate comparing match lists because in most ways they are used its useless, but it's been brought up, so here we go. LECOM doesn't combine everything so it looks more competitive, they do it for anonymity of their students. For the last couple years (since SH graduated its first class), the published placement reports have a table at the end that breaks up placement by campus and field. You can easily figure out percentages for each campus in each field, which is what I did below.
A few things to note:
1) LECOM doesn’t distinguish between pre-lim surg and gen surg, but again it's for anonymity. It does, however, list the number of pre-lim surg matches across all campuses. In 2014, there were 3 total out of 552 students. Even assuming they were all from one campus, it would change Gen Surg match rates by <2% at LECOM-B, ~1% at LECOM-E, or <3% at LECOM-SH. It's relatively negligible, even if you assume the worst and all 3 in 2014 came from one campus, which by itself is probably unlikely. In 2013 there were no students that did pre-lim surg only, so that doesn't really come into play.
2) All LECOM campuses are in states that require DOs to take a TRI in order to be licensed (PA and FL). That significantly skews the number of students who choose to do a TRI or go AOA, because many students are from those states or intend to stay in those states.
3) A snapshot of match lists (i.e. 1 yr) is not really useful. The reason is that there is normal variation year to year based on student interest. This is best exemplified by comparing the huge differences in the percent that go primary care vs. specialty year to year (I included 2013 to compare). From 2013 to 2014 the differences are pretty huge (5% in some fields, and up to 9% in some fields at some campuses. When you're dealing in numbers in the 2-20% range that's huge).
4) The majority of people at LECOM who do a TRI and almost all (if not all) of those that do a TY have something lined up for PGY2 or are applying AOA Derm, which you can only apply to in intern year. Some obviously don't, but the majority do. LECOM doesn't always separate them all out because its based on a combination of self-reporting and AOA match data, but this is based on what I've heard from the admins and students in those classes.
5) As I was doing this, I was reminded over and over how useless individual match lists are when you are looking at raw percentages. Bottom line, its kind of useless to look at percentages like these, unless maybe you combine the data from many years. Look at specifically where they are matching. Is that where you want to match? Maybe you can set up a connection with the alum that goes there. Beyond that, its not a good metric.
Match Percentages in 2013, 2014:
LECOM-B:
Anes: 6.6%, 3.6%
EM: 7.9%, 6.6%
FM: 17.9%, 13.3%
IM/EM: 0%, 0.6%
IM: 26.5%, 21.7%
Neuro: 2.6%, 2.4%
OB/GYN: 3.3%, 1.8%
ENT: 0%, 1.2%
Path: 1.3%, 0.6%
Peds: 7.9%, 6.6%
PM&R: 1.3%, 3.6%
Psych: 2.6%, 2.4%
Rads: 1.3%, 6.0%
Gen Surg: 3.3%, 7.2%
Neuro Surg: 0%, 1.2%
Ortho: 1.3%, 3.0%
TRI: 12.6%, 13.3%
TY: 2.0%, 4.8%
LECOM-E:
Anes: 4.1%, 2.8%
EM: 11.4%, 7.5%
EM/FM: 0.4%, 0%
FM: 19.9%, 22.1%
FM/NMM: 0.4%, 0.4%
FM/OMT: 0.4%, 0%
IM: 20.3%, 19.9%
IM/EM: 0.4%, 0%
IM/Peds: 0.4%, 0%
Neuro: 2.8%, 2.5%
OB/GYN: 3.3%, 2.5%
Ophtho: 0%, 0.7%
ENT: 0%, 0.4%
Path: 0.8%, 1.4%
Peds: 4.4%, 8.9%
PM&R: 0.8%, 1.4%
Psych: 2.0%, 4.6%
Rad Onc: 0.4%, 0.4%
Rads: 2.8%, 4.3%
Gen Surg: 3.3%, 3.2%
Uro: 0%, 0.4%
Neuro Surg: 0.8%, 0%
Ortho: 2.8%, 1.4%
TRI: 13.4%, 10.7%
TY: 4.5%, 4.3%
LECOM-SH:
Anes: 2.0%, 4.8%
EM: 12.0%, 7.6%
FM: 11.0%, 20.9%
IM/EM: 0%, 1.0%
IM: 15.0%, 20.9%
OB/GYN: 4.0%, 3.8%
Ophtho: 1.0%, 0%
ENT: 1.0%, 0%
Peds: 3.0%, 3.8%
Path: 3.0%, 0%
PM&R: 1.0%, 1.9%
Psych: 7.0%, 5.7%
Rads: 6.0%, 2.9%
Gen Surg: 8.0%, 5.7%
Neuro Surg: 0%, 1.0%
Ortho: 1.0%, 1.9%
TRI: 19.0%, 11.4%
TY: 6.0%, 5.7%
UNECOM 2013: *2014 isn't on their site and they don't give raw numbers only single digit percents
Anes: 6%
EM: 8%
FM: 20%
IM: 19%
OB/GYN: 2%
Peds: 10%
PM&R: 3%
Psych: 6%
Gen Surg: 5%
Ortho: 3%
"Transitional": 8%
"Other Specialties": 6%
4% - missing, maybe due to rounding
At first glance it looks like LECOM grads place in a bigger variety of places, but this is hard to say, because it could just be a numbers things (more people, more variety) and UNECOM doesn't really publish the smaller percentages and places them all in an "Other specialties" category, so its not like that's certain.
To compare UNECOM to LECOM-E in 2013:
Anes: 6% to 4.1%
EM: 8% to 11.4%
FM: 20% to 19.9%
IM: 19% to 20.3%
OB/GYN: 2% to 3.3%
Peds: 10% to 4.4%
PM&R: 3% to 0.8%
Psych: 6% to 2.0%
Gen Surg: 5% to 3.3%
Ortho: 3% to 2.8%
Looking at the numbers, it feels like they are all pretty close. Is the 8% vs. 11.4% significant in EM when LECOM-E had 7.5% the next year, probably not. Is the Psych 6% vs. 2.0% significant considering LECOM-E had 4.6% in Psych the next year, probably not. You see my point.
As far as internships go, like I mentioned above, you will have more people going to TRIs and more people going to AOA residencies with LECOM, because both FL and PA require the TRI or "AOA equivalent" for licensure. Apparently, some local ACGME programs don't even interview DOs unless they're in a TRI or have completed one (I just stumbled upon that info for some ACGME Gen Surg positions in my area). For some reason, they don't accommodate for Res42.
In the end this (a match list) is not a good metric to compare different schools, unless like I said, you are interested in a specific program. To give you an example, so far UPMC has taken a LECOM grad for Rad Onc in 2013 and 2014. If you were interested in Rad Onc (ridiculously competitive and virtually impossible as a DO), you might think LECOM would be a good choice, because UPMC is comfortable with LECOM grads and you would probably be able to get some sort of connections through the current alums that are there, provided you are crazy competitive.