- Joined
- Sep 1, 2014
- Messages
- 34
- Reaction score
- 4
What theyll see is speculation?
What theyll see is speculation?
Background checks by government hospitals have a deeper access to criminal records than the one used by most medical schools (Certiphi).He went on to say that sometimes federal agencies do not honor state level deferrals, particularly immigration. I hope this will not be an issue, I wish there was someone I could contact about this.
Background checks by government hospitals have a deeper access to criminal records than the one used by most medical schools (Certiphi).
Medical schools that rely on these hospitals for clinical experience may have questions in their secondaries regarding charges as well as arrests and convictions.
The reason is to mitigate the delay or denial of an access badge.
Yes, I have seen this happen just about every year. This is why there may be questions on the secondary that request this information.It would appear that you are correct, however according to the DEA agent I spoke with, I am not the first person going into medicine with a criminal record. Some of these people do not even have their records expunged, let alone a deferred sentence. My crime was not a question of my morals. Moral turpitude I think they call it?
I hope I will not have any issues. Have you ever heard of anyone being denied a badge?
Yes, I have seen this happen just about every year. This is why there may be questions on the secondary that request this information.
Your charges are not likely to be a serious problem. Not reporting them if specifically asked in the secondary is where a problem could develop.
Hospital privileges could be a problem for a crime of moral turpitude.Understood, it makes sense. Now here is an off topic (slightly) question.
Do you think I will have any trouble finding a job as a doctor with an expunged felony, assuming I make it to being an MD?
Hospital privileges could be a problem for a crime of moral turpitude.
Usually not.mine was drug related, i do not think that qualifies as moral turpitude?
The unfortunate issue here is that most government agencies including state licensure boards and the DEA aren't concerned with the legal runarounds asssociated with first offender and diversion programs. They don't care whether you are 'technically convicted', or whether charges were ultimately dropped. They care about the fact that you initially pled guilty, were found guilty, or pled nolo contendre to the crime at issue. Since you did, in fact, admit guilt you are guilty of felony drug crime and you will be evaluated as such by the powers . If you read a lot of the statutes on state board licensure websites, you'll notice that they often use the term 'convicted' in explaining sanctions, but they'll usually preface these documents by explaining deferred adjudications and other plea offers are considered one and the same as convictions for the purposes of the statutes and evaluating criteria of an applicant.What is my solution here? Report that I was charged and that charges were dropped? Because that is exactly what happened.