- Joined
- Feb 5, 2008
- Messages
- 324
- Reaction score
- 28
Agreed.
This is laughable. Why are the expert witnesses for the case a cardiologist and a pulm-crit care doc?
Do they consult a cardiologist for an infectious disease related criminal case too?
Do they have more credibility than an anesthesiologist for a case such as this one? I know the public is clueless as to what we do but I would think that the judicial system should at least recognize our expertise here.
I guess just because Murray is (was) a Cardiologist they wanted to get one to say "ya what he did was nuts, and not in the realm of a Cardiologists' duty" but then for that expert witness to expand his testimony and give a "what should have been done......" that doesn't exactly jive with the topic either is interesting.
I still don't understand Murray. I mean I'm just a med student that won't even be close to getting back into the black for about 10 yrs and I still can't even imagine being so blinded by the Benji's to administer Prop as a sleep aid.