• Practice your interview with the new SDN AI Interview Coach. Choose a school, answer by voice or typing, and receive a personalized feedback report. Available now to all SDN members. Try the AI Interview Coach.

Letting DEA and Malpractice Lapse?

Started by Ephelis
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Ephelis

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I am between jobs right now (not practicing)

I had a DEA number which I never used (I'm a pathologist, I don't prescribe anything that requires a DEA, or anything at all, really) but my previous employer wanted me to have one anyway. But it came up for renewal and I let it lapse. Does anyone know if there are problems with doing this? Will it be a problem to get it again or will the Feds show up at my door and demand an explanation (in the middle of the night with flashlights...just kidding)

Also, I got tail coverage for my malpractice, but as of today am not covered...I wouldn't think I need it since I'm not practicing, but a friend said it makes it harder and more expensive to get it again if I have an "uncovered" time period. The problem is, I don't have money for all this stuff right now. I'm keeping up my state licenses but that's it.

Any advice would be appreciated.

Thank you.