- Joined
- Feb 16, 2009
- Messages
- 1,044
- Reaction score
- 2
All right, so I was doing the EK 30-minute exam from lecture 5, and I came across this.
"Lift force is directly proportional to the difference in pressure above and below the ball."
Pa + 1/2 * rho * va^2 = Pb + 1/2 * rho * vb^2
Where the a subscript is above and the b subscript is below.
So Pb-Pa = 1/2 * rho * va^2 - 1/2 * rho * vb^2
Now intuitively, this makes sense. However, in passage 3, EK just has deltaP, which they say represents the difference in pressure above and below the ball, which would mean Pa-Pb.
This last sentence does not make sense intuitively, as it is saying that a higher pressure above the ball would lead to a higher velocity above the ball which would cause a downward force.
So basically, is it a typo in the passage where EK says the above quoted sentence?
"Lift force is directly proportional to the difference in pressure above and below the ball."
Pa + 1/2 * rho * va^2 = Pb + 1/2 * rho * vb^2
Where the a subscript is above and the b subscript is below.
So Pb-Pa = 1/2 * rho * va^2 - 1/2 * rho * vb^2
Now intuitively, this makes sense. However, in passage 3, EK just has deltaP, which they say represents the difference in pressure above and below the ball, which would mean Pa-Pb.
This last sentence does not make sense intuitively, as it is saying that a higher pressure above the ball would lead to a higher velocity above the ball which would cause a downward force.
So basically, is it a typo in the passage where EK says the above quoted sentence?